The problem with the Kiffin approach is that he is going to have cultural issues that can't be foreseen. Team Culture is so important in football and the team that has the best culture will play better in tough situations. Mercenaries can never be counted on to stick with you when the going gets tough and in the SEC the going is always tough. Building a positive culture takes time and needs to start at the freshman level. (I actually think HCKD is doing a pretty good job of this)
You can envision a future where P5 schools circle like vultures above the G5, FCS, and even D2 schools looking for to pick off those players instead of recruiting high school players. I look for those schools to fall flat on their faces
I disagree. I think the transfer players have are more likely to have a better attitude being a few years more mature. If they aren't, the likelihood the coaches know about his attitude problem is greater, they won't be caught off guard
There are always individuals who are outliers. Spud Webb didn't disprove the data that says NBA players are significantly taller than average humans. The outliers are cooked into the class rank data since every program is going to have its hits and misses.
Your roster talent is what the class ranks says it is.
Recruiting rankings are also highly correlated to funding, see below
It snowed in Hawaii last week, therefore the data that says most days in Hawaii are warm is suspect.
Spud Webb made the NBA all star game, therefore the data that says most NBA players are tall is suspect.
A zero-star recruit at a small directional school was drafted in the first round, therefore the data that says highly rated recruits are more likely to play in the NFL is suspect.
I get it, human brains are actually wired to believe anecdotal narratives over numerical analysis, but recognizing and overcoming this human limitation is a key component of advanced human intelligence.
Human brains are wired for tunnel vision. Not anecdotal vs numerical. You look at the recruiting rankings and see Georgia, bama, Clemson, and tOSU in the playoff every year and say well duh! You overlook teams like Texas, Tennessee and Miami who've been trash in recent years. He looks at the recruiting rankings and sees Iowa, Utah and Wisconsin going to the conference c c every other year and thinks to himself if they can do it, why not us?
For those interested here’s the full list (circa Sept-2021)
Alabama | 53 |
Ohio State | 47 |
LSU | 46 |
Georgia | 35 |
Notre Dame | 34 |
Clemson | 33 |
Iowa | 33 |
Florida | 32 |
Michigan | 32 |
Oklahoma | 31 |
Penn State | 31 |
Texas | 26 |
Miami (Fla.) | 25 |
UCLA | 24 |
Washington | 24 |
Florida State | 23 |
Texas A&M | 23 |
USC | 23 |
Stanford | 22 |
South Carolina | 21 |
Wisconsin | 21 |
Auburn | 20 |
Mississippi State | 19 |
Oregon | 19 |
NC State | 18 |
Temple | 18 |
Utah | 18 |
Missouri | 17 |
Nebraska | 17 |
Tennessee | 17 |
Pittsburgh | 16 |
Virginia Tech | 16 |
Arkansas | 15 |
Boston College | 15 |
Oklahoma State | 15 |
Kentucky | 14 |
TCU | 14 |
Baylor | 13 |
North Carolina | 13 |
Ole Miss | 12 |
Rutgers | 12 |
Texas Tech | 12 |
California | 11 |
Colorado | 11 |
Duke | 11 |
Houston | 11 |
Illinois | 11 |
Maryland | 11 |
Memphis | 11 |
Oregon State | 11 |
Purdue | 11 |
Vanderbilt | 11 |
West Virginia | 11 |
Boise State | 10 |
Louisville | 10 |
Michigan State | 10 |
Minnesota | 10 |
UCF | 10 |
Virginia | 10 |
Kansas State | 9 |
SMU | 9 |
Western Michigan | 9 |
Arizona State | 8 |
BYU | 8 |
Cincinnati | 8 |
Indiana | 8 |
Northwestern | 8 |
Utah State | 8 |
Arizona | 7 |
Central Michigan | 7 |
Florida Atlantic | 7 |
Fresno State | 7 |
Louisiana Tech | 7 |
Syracuse | 7 |
Toledo | 7 |
Wyoming | 7 |
Appalachian State | 6 |
Colorado State | 6 |
Georgia Southern | 6 |
Georgia Tech | 6 |
Old Dominion | 6 |
San Jose State | 6 |
Tulane | 6 |
Connecticut | 5 |
Marshall | 5 |
San Diego State | 5 |
South Florida | 5 |
Southern Mississippi | 5 |
Wake Forest | 5 |
Washington State | 5 |
Western Kentucky | 5 |
Buffalo | 4 |
Kansas | 4 |
Northern Illinois | 4 |
Rice | 4 |
East Carolina | 3 |
Eastern Michigan | 3 |
Iowa State | 3 |
Massachusetts | 3 |
Miami (Ohio) | 3 |
Middle Tennessee State | 3 |
Nevada | 3 |
North Texas | 3 |
UTEP | 3 |
Arkansas State | 2 |
Army | 2 |
Ball State | 2 |
Florida International | 2 |
Georgia State | 2 |
Louisiana | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
Troy | 2 |
Tulsa | 2 |
UAB | 2 |
Akron | 1 |
Bowling Green | 1 |
Coastal Carolina | 1 |
Hawaii | 1 |
Kent State | 1 |
Navy | 1 |
New Mexico | 1 |
South Alabama | 1 |
Texas State | 1 |
UNLV | 1 |
UTSA | 1 |
Your Daily Fan Network
www.google.com
The answer to our problems is found reconciling these data sets. We spend the 36th most on recruiting (honestly I'm surprised it isn't worse) but money spent on football recruiting as a percentage of our entire ad recruiting budget is 7th at 55%. We're prioritizing football like every school should (minus basketball schools). It's the harsh truth, want new endorsements volleyball team, how about a new lab chemist's? Then put money into football, Harvard of the west is a pipe dream and we already have a football natty, jocks-1 nerds-0. Our spot is massively inflated on that chart given we don't have sports those other schools do but that's part of the point. We spend more on recruiting for football than every other cu program combined, and football has the least to show for it. We dedicate money to football, as a percent of our entire ad budget, to such an extent it's better than all but 7 schools..? Our basketball team can be competitive, why not football?
600k a year isn't enough, that's half of Oregon's American airlines tab. I've seen articles that said cu has upped it past 700k since. Good start but Idk what the hell makes some of these teams so marginally average on paper yet successful on the field. If I had to guess, I'd say geolocation is part of it, as is eliminating wasteful spending. Idk Wtf software licensing and subscriptions entails but I wouldn't be happy hearing about cu paying 98k a year to hand out rivals subscriptions to recruits or giving every coach on staff every streaming service in existence just so they can be comfy in hotel rooms inbetween flights.
So George, why the **** are you complaining about players transferring due to nil? Sounds like buffs with a brand is worthless, huh? After that 100 million dollar investment, looks like the only ones getting screwed are the fans. Here's an idea, get 5 of your Texas rangers buddies to donate 15k each. Then find the sorriest most fresh faced job hungry football loving sob you can. Make him the recruiting director, give him a room in that nice new champions center to live in and tell him he's not allowed to leave for one whole year or until we have the best class in the nation. Makes more sense than a new sound system. **** you'd get more fans to come back by fixing the ****ing John's on the west side. Ffs every time we lose all the old man talks about is how long it took him to get to the horse trough we call pissers, I'm sure you can relate!? Start winning plz, kthanksbye