Most of the excitement is due to the spring game, where he looked admittedly pretty decent. But it was the same game where the defense was so vanilla that they didn't even play in their base defense. The rest of the excitement comes from camps that he has participated in, where he has been praised for having beautiful throws. But again, without any pressure.Man I need to stop reading some Cornhusker boards. But...Joel Klatt had something to say on him: http://nebraska.247sports.com/Bolt/...U-can-overachieve-due-to-Tanner-Lee-105450620
They think he's essentially a one-year, Davis Webb type rental. My issue with that is that Webb was more heralded out of HS and by FAR more prolific in his early career. And was already high up on draft boards and most analysts believed he would play himself into the first round. Why did everyone seemingly miss Lee out of HS? And again when he decided to transfer? Why did he complete the same percent of his passes at Tulane that Tommy Armstrong did at NU - a guy all Nebraska fans have promptly thrown under the bus as a reason for Riley's struggles? They hope/believe it wasn't the right system and the surrounding talent wasn't as good. But the opposing talent is now league's better as well.
And to add to that: they suck at running the ball (they averaged 2.2 ypc in that same charmin-soft spring game), Riley (and former players) has questioned both the OL and the OL coach in the spring, and they lost their best and most dependable WR to graduation - yikes. We will see for sure. I certainly wouldn't bet on the over tho.