1994-1997 me can’t comprehend this…but 2023 me loves it!1-5. We might win against Nebraska.
I saw this tweet before the game:Wells was the starting center last night. Washington was sorely missed
I saw this tweet before the game:
Was it wrong?
I was honestly thinking that. We also don't deal with injuries as much as other teams.What if, the reason we are a second half team, on both offense and defense, is because our conditioning is better? Even in our depth?
1) conditioning.What if, the reason we are a second half team, on both offense and defense, is because our conditioning is better? Even in our depth?
Was at the game, and saw him spending a large amount of time on the sidelines - but may have been due to a lo lt of rotations.I don't remember seeing Cokes yesterday. Did he play?
And on #2, as the better team gets more gassed during the game, the less talented but better conditioned team will appear to play better.1) conditioning.
2) players aren’t as good as other team, but our coaches are legit.
Or we shouldn’t have an inexperienced analyst running our ST’s
I think conditioning is helpful but still amounts to losses without superior coaching.And on #2, as the better team gets more gassed during the game, the less talented but better conditioned team will appear to play better.
It's possible where we see our poor starts as a reflection on not being well prepared for the game, it maybe just what to expect this year because of better conditioning.
Being better conditioned is a product of coaching and possibly a small part due to training at elevation.I think conditioning is helpful but still amounts to losses without superior coaching.
Our interior OL, at least, seem incapable of moving anyone. You simply cannot run the ball if the OL can’t put—even—a hat on a hat successfully. So many plays our OL end up just standing around watching players who have already run by/around them. UCLA DL is mostly speedy EDGE rushers, even the interior, it seems. We all watched them out quick every OL no matter the down and distance, over and over.Well. Last nite was pretty bad for the offense, specifically on the line.
The scheme I saw last nite basically equated to...have Sanders snap the ball from shotgun, either get the ball out in 1 second, or run for your life to try to get 3 seconds.
Its apparent that lewis scrapped some of the core principles of the scheme he was running at Kent state, either because our offensive line is not capable of those principles, or the staff feels they are better off abandoning those principles.
Considering their limited success, I would think it has to be the former unless this is on prime for some reason.
Sorry but you can't claim you can't do something when you figuratively never do it, when you do try it with your smallest RB who has shown no ability to break tackles, and have the most generic run call possible...all while you refuse to bring in more blockers and insist on going 4 wide.Our interior OL, at least, seem incapable of moving anyone. You simply cannot run the ball if the OL can’t put—even—a hat on a hat successfully. So many plays our OL end up just standing around watching players who have already run by/around them. UCLA DL is mostly speedy EDGE rushers, even the interior, it seems. We all watched them out quick every OL no matter the down and distance, over and over.
I think it was obvious almost immediately that we could not sustain any block long enough to call running plays. UCLA got interior penetration almost immediately, every play. There’s just no way to call running plays that way. We’d call a run and go backwards. At which point, everyone on D just creeps forward more and more, making things worse and worse each quarter.
Saying we should “commit to the run” means essentially just planning on giving up series after series to three and out, in hopes that we get some rhythm to run. That doesn’t work when you don’t get first downs and just keep punting. All while you have a great QB, who will be standing watching RBs get pushed back into his lap, not be given any chance to help the team.
Even if you do all this and don’t run the ball, it’s not going to matter.Motion, misdirection, sweeps, options, toss plays, reverse, etc. lots of ways to keep the defense more on their heels than toes. If you only ever run up the middle or shotgun with no motion, you are making life easy on the D.
Something I've been thinking about... It feels like CP brought in Sean Lewis as OC and kind of forced him to run a different offense, one that's much closer to what SS ran at JSU than anything actually resembling what Lewis ran at Kent State. If you go back and watch this video that's been posted here a number of times and compare it to what we see from CU, there are just glaring differences, and it starts with the fact that the entire offense is predicated on the QB run. The run game is read option or triple option out of Shotgun and the passing game is mostly built off that with RPOs.
Frankly, the offense is a college only offense and isn't going to help a QB translate to the NFL in any way (read into this what you may). Also, Shedeur is an elite passer and not a read option QB, so I'm not advocating for them to force SS to run the Sean Lewis offense, but I'm mostly wondering why Sean Lewis was CP's pick for OC in the first place? I think Lewis wanted out of Kent State, he came highly recommended from people that CP trusts, and they both convinced each other that they could marry the SL offense and Air Raid concepts together into an offense that Shedeur can run and that's attractive for the NFL. IMO, he needed to go find a proven Air Raid guy, who could build off what SS was already doing at JSU and take it to the next level.
End of the day, personnel on the OL may be their biggest issue, but I just don't think what Sean Lewis knows and wants to do is what Shedeur wants to do (for good reason, IMO) or can execute, and they've been trying to adjust on the fly. It might be prudent for both Lewis and CP to agree to part ways and for CP to bring in a guy who can design an offense, including a run game, around a pocket passer.
Something I've been thinking about... It feels like CP brought in Sean Lewis as OC and kind of forced him to run a different offense, one that's much closer to what SS ran at JSU than anything actually resembling what Lewis ran at Kent State. If you go back and watch this video that's been posted here a number of times and compare it to what we see from CU, there are just glaring differences, and it starts with the fact that the entire offense is predicated on the QB run. The run game is read option or triple option out of Shotgun and the passing game is mostly built off that with RPOs.
Frankly, the offense is a college only offense and isn't going to help a QB translate to the NFL in any way (read into this what you may). Also, Shedeur is an elite passer and not a read option QB, so I'm not advocating for them to force SS to run the Sean Lewis offense, but I'm mostly wondering why Sean Lewis was CP's pick for OC in the first place? I think Lewis wanted out of Kent State, he came highly recommended from people that CP trusts, and they both convinced each other that they could marry the SL offense and Air Raid concepts together into an offense that Shedeur can run and that's attractive for the NFL. IMO, he needed to go find a proven Air Raid guy, who could build off what SS was already doing at JSU and take it to the next level.
End of the day, personnel on the OL may be their biggest issue, but I just don't think what Sean Lewis knows and wants to do is what Shedeur wants to do (for good reason, IMO) or can execute, and they've been trying to adjust on the fly. It might be prudent for both Lewis and CP to agree to part ways and for CP to bring in a guy who can design an offense, including a run game, around a pocket passer.
I could see Lewis getting the Syracuse job if it becomes available. Leftwich would make a lot of sense.Well said. I'm still in the camp that Byron Leftwich will be our OC next year.
Something I've been thinking about... It feels like CP brought in Sean Lewis as OC and kind of forced him to run a different offense, one that's much closer to what SS ran at JSU than anything actually resembling what Lewis ran at Kent State. If you go back and watch this video that's been posted here a number of times and compare it to what we see from CU, there are just glaring differences, and it starts with the fact that the entire offense is predicated on the QB run. The run game is read option or triple option out of Shotgun and the passing game is mostly built off that with RPOs.
Frankly, the offense is a college only offense and isn't going to help a QB translate to the NFL in any way (read into this what you may). Also, Shedeur is an elite passer and not a read option QB, so I'm not advocating for them to force SS to run the Sean Lewis offense, but I'm mostly wondering why Sean Lewis was CP's pick for OC in the first place? I think Lewis wanted out of Kent State, he came highly recommended from people that CP trusts, and they both convinced each other that they could marry the SL offense and Air Raid concepts together into an offense that Shedeur can run and that's attractive for the NFL. IMO, he needed to go find a proven Air Raid guy, who could build off what SS was already doing at JSU and take it to the next level.
End of the day, personnel on the OL may be their biggest issue, but I just don't think what Sean Lewis knows and wants to do is what Shedeur wants to do (for good reason, IMO) or can execute, and they've been trying to adjust on the fly. It might be prudent for both Lewis and CP to agree to part ways and for CP to bring in a guy who can design an offense, including a run game, around a pocket passer.