I read a 'knowledgeable' commentator saying that the nfl and the owners were just fed up with college kids calling the shots and SS was ripe to be made an example of. This was a lesson to all future draftees - the league is in charge.
Given all the facts out there (i.e. espn did dozens of mock drafts and SS never went lower than #19), if they can find any evidence that there were some discussions or agreements between any of the big boys, they should sue in civil court. Definitely several torts involved. It would be an easy sell to a jury
If I was CP, I'd quietly hire the best PI in NY and get them to work. Somebody bragged to a wife or a buddy. Goddell made $50 million a year and a jet, years back - they will get no sympathy, if they set out to interfere with/harm this kid's future. Spend 100k and find out.
I get the the talk about arrogance and entitlement, but these guys have drafted men who many say are rapists.
This was absolutely not a situation where all of the GMs, owners and scouts decided to forget about his ability and not take him
Everyone needs to understand how organizations like this think. It's a culture set at the top and how ownership looks at employees and players.
They are not people. They are either performing assets or non-performing assets on a cost/benefit scale. Zero fvcks are given about whether a guy is a criminal, abuses women, or whatever, as long as he doesn't get caught and/or have it impact his availability or performance. The greater the performance or higher the potential performance, the more bullsh!t management, coaches and/or teammates are expected to put up with and even be enablers for.
What they have little patience for are guys who are aware of the culture and don't humble themselves and kiss the ring. Guys who know the score and will butt heads with coaches if they're not being utilized in a way that maximizes their stardom & earning potential and butt heads with management if they're not being paid market value or aren't being provided teammates that are good enough... those are the guys who they see as having attitude problems and being disruptive influences who get coaches and executives fired. It's why even the elite talents in pro sports can end up being run out of town, end up playing for multiple teams during their careers, and have their character assassinated even though they perform and don't have off-field issues (i.e., Randy Moss, Jimmy Butler, etc).
Heck, consider how much vitriol Deion Sanders was subjected to because he was playing 2 pro sports while being very focused on what he was being paid and maximizing his endorsements and celebrity.
This is what they saw with Shedeur and why they decided that the bulljunk, from the perspective of ownership/ management/ coaches exceeded the talent in their cost/ benefit analysis. The fact that he would be good, draw a lot of attention, and have the support of teammates (who support another player getting his and live by a code of never getting between another player and his money) because he's a great teammate from their perspective... they saw it as a negative. The analysis was, "Yes, we can win with Shedeur as our QB. But we don't want to and he's not a generational talent so we can justify a strategy of trying to win a different way without him."