BuffLuke80
Well-Known Member
I can't either man.If a bigger program comes calling I can't imagine he would stay at KU regardless of the raise he gets
I can't either man.If a bigger program comes calling I can't imagine he would stay at KU regardless of the raise he gets
Bingo ! Texas recruiting is A#1 especially if one thinks CU will be back in the Big12 within the next couple of years.I am out on Bronco. No Texas, No good.
I am out on Bronco. No Texas, No good.
Eh, I dunno. If recruiting Texas, California, and Colorado is viewed as critical for success at CU, I would expect any competent coach would assemble a staff of guys who can recruit those states. Bronco seems like a guy with at least baseline competence for building a program, so I would expect him to do just fine on that front. Certainly wouldn’t view that as a disqualifier for him.Bingo ! Texas recruiting is A#1 especially if one thinks CU will be back in the Big12 within the next couple of years.
The only advantage to Deion is that he may already be better known than all but a handful college coaches.On Football: Could Coach Prime jump from SWAC to big-time?
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Sitting on a metal folding chair just beyond the end zone of Mississippi State's practice field, Deion Sanders is alone watching the Bulldogs scrimmage on a muggy spring day.apnews.com
i know Deion has been brought up before, but I thought this article was interesting. He’s about as far from B4L as I can imagine, would be affordable (I think), and FSU being unbeaten makes that an unlikely destination.
The only advantage to Deion is that he may already be better known than all but a handful college coaches.
He would be a train wreck in Boulder. Culturally he is absolutely not a fit.
Even if we get the changes administratively that we need to compete we will never be the place for a program like Deion wants to run.
He probably will get offers for P5 jobs sooner than later but he is not what we need.
He’s organized recruiting at a school who has a monopoly on a substantial number of older players and a flagship school in a state/region with boat loads of talent within driving distance. When comparing candidates, the experience and connections needed to reinvigorate the DFW pipeline is an important differentiator.Eh, I dunno. If recruiting Texas, California, and Colorado is viewed as critical for success at CU, I would expect any competent coach would assemble a staff of guys who can recruit those states. Bronco seems like a guy with at least baseline competence for building a program, so I would expect him to do just fine on that front. Certainly wouldn’t view that as a disqualifier for him.
Understand what you’re getting at, just think geographic connections can be provided thru a well constructed staff. The lion’s share of recruits under KD have been Texas kids (obviously not all from the metroplex), but if this current crew can get some traction down there, I would expect it’s not an insurmountable obstacle. That said, there are other potential candidates who do have more established connections in DFW, if they also have the fundamental characteristics necessary to run a program in need of a rebuild, bring them on.He’s organized recruiting at a school who has a monopoly on a substantial number of older players and a flagship school in a state/region with boat loads of talent within driving distance. When comparing candidates, the experience and connections needed to reinvigorate the DFW pipeline is an important differentiator.
Being a strong leader in recruiting in DFW/HOU is a necessary, but insufficient, criterion for the next HC.Understand what you’re getting at, just think geographic connections can be provided thru a well constructed staff. The lion’s share of recruits under KD have been Texas kids (obviously not all from the metroplex), but if this current crew can get some traction down there, I would expect it’s not an insurmountable obstacle. That said, there are other potential candidates who do have more established connections in DFW, if they also have the fundamental characteristics necessary to run a program in need of a rebuild, bring them on.
He'd be a very good recruiter and would create a ton of buzz - I'm not seeing the issue hereThe only advantage to Deion is that he may already be better known than all but a handful college coaches.
He would be a train wreck in Boulder. Culturally he is absolutely not a fit.
Even if we get the changes administratively that we need to compete we will never be the place for a program like Deion wants to run.
He probably will get offers for P5 jobs sooner than later but he is not what we need.
For a lot of places he would be great.He'd be a very good recruiter and would create a ton of buzz - I'm not seeing the issue here
What specifically and why should we care what Boulder thinks? If Boulder had their way CU wouldn't have a team.For a lot of places he would be great.
Boulder is an interesting environment and I don't think his approach to the game would go over well.
Because like it or not the football program is a part of the university and university community which interacts with the city as a whole.What specifically and why should we care what Boulder thinks? If Boulder had their way CU wouldn't have a team.
If you're hiring based on what Boulder finds acceptable....
Sorry just not seeing anything that makes this a valid argument against Sanders here.Because like it or not the football program is a part of the university and university community which interacts with the city as a whole.
CU is not a SEC school or a Nebraska where as long as you are winning anything goes.
Yeah, he isn’t coming to Colorado.Re: Deion
I'm sure he takes being a coach very seriously, and he seems to be a good one. But he makes a lot of money off the brand of being Deion Sanders. I very highly doubt he would even consider risking that brand on being the head coach at Colorado.