I love Elway, but when he went head to head with Montana on the biggest stage in the Super Bowl he got positively slaughtered. Montana was on a team that was one of best ever.
fify
Elway was on a team that was a sub-.500 team without him, Montana was on a team that would have been in the Super Bowl with any of about 10 QBs that year. Absolutely invalid basis for comparison.
Montana was a great winner but he couldn't carry John's jock. Put Elway on that SF team and you have a team that wins more SBs than Montana did. Put Montana on Elways Bronco teams under Reeves and you don't make a Super Bowl.
But when a guy like Bradshaw, a career 50% passer, is considered one of the best ever, you have to think it is because Pittsburgh won Super Bowls. Right?The "great team" argument doesn't hold water for me - of course you need a great team to win a Super Bowl, but with a few exceptions (Dilfer, Rob Johnson) the QB is part of what makes them great. Jordan, Bird, Babe Ruth, Brady, Bradshaw, these guys were all on great teams and they're still all-time greats.
And there is no way you can tell me how a team would have done without Player X or if so-and-so was on the team instead, that's ridiculous...you're guessing, nothing more.
Elway is one of the best ever, no doubt, but he had a team good enough to win the AFC title but ended up on the wrong side of the most lopsided Super Bowl ever. To me the greatest QB ever doesn't lose 55-10 in the Super Bowl.
But when a guy like Bradshaw, a career 50% passer, is considered one of the best ever, you have to think it is because Pittsburgh won Super Bowls. Right?
One of the best sure, but not THE best. Elway's career completion percentage was only 56% so not a big leap from Bradshaw in that regard.
To me the greats play at their best when it matters most. Montana played better in the Super Bowl than anyone ever, period. Montana's stats:
Career: 63% completions, 1.96 TD/Int ratio, 92.3 QB rating.
but in his 4 Super Bowls: 68% completions, 11 TDs, 0 Int, 127.8 QB rating.
Elway's numbers aren't even close.
He's on several top tensSteve Young has to be on this list.
Elway v. Montana by the numbers:
REGULAR SEASON:
Completion Percentage:
Montanta - 63%
Elway - 57%
TD / INT Ratio:
Montana - 1.92
Elway - 1.31
Yds / Game:
Montana - 236
Elway - 223
QB Rating:
Montana - 92.3
Elway - 79.9
PLAYOFFS
Completion Percentage:
Montanta - 63%
Elway - 55%
TD / INT Ratio:
Montana - 2.14
Elway - 1.29
Yds / Game:
Montana - 251
Elway - 226
QB Rating:
Montana - 95.6
Elway - 79.7
SUPER BOWLS
Completion Percentage:
Montanta - 68%
Elway - 50%
TD / INT Ratio:
Montana - 11 TDs, 0 Ints
Elway - 3 TDs, 8 Ints
Yds / Game:
Montana - 286
Elway - 226
QB Rating:
Montana - 127.8
Elway - 59.3
Record:
Montana - 4-0
Elway - 2-3
This isn't even close. Montana got better in the playoffs and the Super Bowl, Elway got worse.
I don't think you can compare like that. Montana's coach was an innovative genius...on the cutting edge. Throw in Jerry Rice, etc.
I think the better way to look at it would be to say what would happen if the two would have switched teams. Maybe the same? I feel confident saying that if Elway would have been on the Niners he could have put up similar results to Montana.
You're right, a hypothetical guessing game is probably the best way to evaluate QBs. Let's not let actual results that happened in the real world cloud our judgment here. :rolling_eyes:
A little off-topic.
I grew up watching #10 Zorn to #80 Largent. Largent finished his receiving career with more catches, more yards and more TDs than any prior WR in history at the time...
Zorn will never be on a Top 10 QB list, but he was really fun to watch at times. Largent was simply amazing. They made (NFL.com's) Top 10 QB-WR combos ever. [video]http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d8074c941/Top-Ten-Pass-Combos-Jim-Zorn-and-Steve-Largent[/video] That would be another interesting thread...
I don't see the need for sarcasm. We're just having a discussion.
But yes, in my opinion, I think that is the best way to evaluate. Football is very far from being an individual sport. There are so many other factors involved. The types of offenses run by Denver and SF hugely impact stats for the QB.
Plus, you can't ignore the Jerry Rice factor.
I'm not sayign Elway is better, but I don't agree with the idea that Montana was better "and it's not even close". Certainly JM's stats were far superior, but to me, that's not the ultimate measure when there are so many other variables.