That was a pretty stringent denial from Miller leaving little wiggle room...Did Schlabach **** up?
Doubt he did, Miller is trying to save his ass. Idk how involved he was personally but he knew about it.That was a pretty stringent denial from Miller leaving little wiggle room...Did Schlabach **** up?
1) Almost nothing associated with higher education is primarily about higher education. My wife is a prof at CU and higher education is more about attracting students and retaining them at nearly any cost. Seats must be filled with students receiving federal student loans in order to keep the thing going. How else could the school afford my wife's outrageous benefits?
2) You don't want college athletes making business decisions? Every student, athlete or not, should be making a business decision. If they did, they wouldn't go six figures in debt earning a soft degree where they have no hopes of ever digging out of the hole they created.
3) The NFL and NBA don't need to do anything. They have their own business to run, why should they be concerned with helping their competition? And they aren't getting free labor, they pay the kids when they go pro.
4) There is no dilemma for the NCAA when it comes to college sports. They made the decision decades ago to make bank. The only dilemma is whether or not fans that hang on to the antiquated thought that major college athletes aren't already professionals will start to understand the truth.
1) Fair - I think there's a very strong argument that higher education often is a farce, or at the least needs to be altered.
2) (just deleted retort to you, because it ended up being all semantics....I'll conceded the term business decision, but no, I don't like preying adults swaying kids with money, which brings your point in 4 - antiquated thoughts).
3) The NFL and NBA don't NEED to do anything, but that's bull**** they're not getting free labor. A huge chunk of their scouting and development is done for them. From a position of how education, including higher, should be more paramount of an institution, and college sports mocks it, to make things work those leagues should do something. Nothing legally obligates them, but the obligation is more societal.
4) Absolutely there is a dilemma. College sports isn't a singular entity that all of the sudden one day decided to make huge gobs of money. There was an ideal of kids earning a free education via their physical talents. Their is then the problem of regulating, hence the NCAA, to prevent people taking advantage of kids and kids not doing the right things. And slowly over time (although maybe exponentially since ...perhaps the 80s?) with the success of sports, money got bigger and bigger, and the ideal has become a facade. It's an antiquated ideal if you don't believe in it, but just because it's not practiced anymore at all, doesn't mean it's not worthwhile. Many major college athletes are semi-professional, but not all. They all should be allowed to be fully professional, earning more and in the open. This can be done under minor leagues. Why tie schools into it all? When education is tied with it, then there's a dilemma.
That was a pretty stringent denial from Miller leaving little wiggle room...Did Schlabach **** up?
fify.3) I just have to disagree. When a law firm goes to a moot court competition, when Apple attends a student science fair, are they receiving free labor? No. The perspective employees are learning their craft in hopes of making it to the next level. Just have to agree to disagree. The reason more kids don't go over seas to play basketball is because there is tremendous value building your brand for one year in the NCAA. You are simply discounting this.
4) The reason minor league type replacements for College Football and Basketball won't work is because we, as fans, have no emotional attachment to said teams. I still get fired up when I see Ralphie run, or when I hear the fight song. You can't replace the pageantry or emotion of rooting for your Nike sponsored college.
3) I just have to disagree. When a law firm goes to a moot court competition, when Apple attends a student science fair, are they receiving free labor? No. The perspective employees are learning their craft in hopes of making it to the next level. Just have to agree to disagree. The reason more kids don't go over seas to play basketball is because there is tremendous value building your brand for one year in the NCAA. You are simply discounting this.
4) The reason minor league type replacements for College Football and Basketball won't work is because we, as fans, have no emotional attachment to said teams. I still get fired up when I see Ralphie run, or when I hear the fight song. You can't replace the pageantry or emotion of rooting for your college.
If college sports is just minor leagues, then I no longer care about it. The people who want to pay players and treat it like the minor leagues are the people who already see it like that, are not fans, and focus all their attention on the pro league. They're the last people we should be listening to.
No, I don't see players as fans. At least not in the same way. It's a completely different perspective. And having some friends who are former college athletes who played professionally, it's usually very telling if at the end of their career they choose to go into pro broadcasting instead of college broadcasting. Besides, most of what I'm hearing from the pros is that college sports is dirty and a complete hypocrisy. They don't seem to want to clean it up. They don't seem to want college sports to have much to do with college.?! Come on man...these statements are quite dramatic. It reminds me of two extreme comments told to me shortly after the last presidential election. "If you didn't vote for Trump, you don't love this country!" and not verbatim, but, "People that don't live in the cities don't know what's going on and shouldn't be allowed to vote."
All those former players shouldn't be listened to, because they're not fans?
No, I don't see players as fans. At least not in the same way. It's a completely different perspective. And having some friends who are former college athletes who played professionally, it's usually very telling if at the end of their career they choose to go into pro broadcasting instead of college broadcasting. Besides, most of what I'm hearing from the pros is that college sports is dirty and a complete hypocrisy. They don't seem to want to clean it up. They don't seem to want college sports to have much to do with college.
Who initially reported the wire tap story and the details as they relate specifically to Miller? That person should probably be fired immediately, and I wouldn’t even hesitate to go as far as face some kind of legal backlash.
I find it telling that when the Miller news initially broke he chose to sideline himself from the team and went into bunker mode. It was only after the he received whispers that the tape might not exist that he decided to go on this crusade to save his name.
Par for the course journalism from ESPN, btw.
I find it telling that when the Miller news initially broke he chose to sideline himself from the team and went into bunker mode. It was only after the he received whispers that the tape might not exist that he decided to go on this crusade to save his name.
Horrible journalism by ESPN, btw.
I agree with Clay Travis here. No middle ground. Either there is no evidence and ESPn made the biggest mistake in the history of sports journalism or Miller is the biggest liar scumbag in a sport filled with lying scumbags.
Kind of interesting article on the fortunes of the family of Marvin Bagley III.
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/i...alty_game.html
"Marvin Bagley Jr. and his wife filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in April 2008, during the Great Recession, listing their combined annual income at just over $44,000. Property records indicate the Bagley home was sold in 2011 at a trustee's sale -- typically a sign of a foreclosure.
Four years later, shortly after Nike's sponsorship of the team became public, they left their working-class neighborhood in Phoenix for Southern California. In a tax filing, the Bagleys listed a home address in a gated subdivision in Northridge called Porter Ranch. Similarly sized homes in the vicinity typically sell for $750,000 to $1.5 million, said Jose Contreras, a Coldwell Banker real estate broker active in the area. Rents in the neighborhood range from $2,500 to $7,500 a month.
Neither the Bagleys nor Nike would offer any details about the team sponsorship or the family's personal finances. Contacted via telephone and through the Duke University sports information department, the Bagleys "respectfully declined" to comment."