Going back to my OP (after taking a moment to give a h/t to @wsp4820 for pure gold there) --
A big tent guy doesn't make ****ing injury excuses to explain away losses. A big tent guy isn't so afraid of failure (potential sack) that he's afraid to pursue victory (going for a 4th down play on the opponent 36). We need to get the timid and weak out of this program.
CU could have constructed a pretty solid OL over the tenure of this staff, but they've missed on so many in-state OL prospects that it almost has to be intentional. I seem to recall MM having the coaches canvas pretty much every HS in the state at the start of his tenure, but he's pretty much completely ignored it since then.In the 2019 recruiting class, Colorado prep OLs are committed to the following programs:
OT Barrett Miller (Stanford)
OT Michael Lynn (Nebraska)
OG Austin Johnson (Colorado)
OG Jake Wiley (Colorado)
OT Alijah Bates (Arizona State)
OC Drake Nugent (uncommitted) - offers from Stanford, Utah, Arizona State and Oklahoma State but not from CU
Yet for some reason CU chose an OL from Europe. A guy with an offer list of Akron, Buffalo, UConn and Dartmouth.
Last year there wasn't much in-state other than Spencer Lovell, a 6'7" 305 lb 3* OT from Fort Collins. Arizona State got him and CU didn't even offer.
I don't believe you bring them in as part of a succession plan, but you do make sure that you hire the level of coordinator that could be hired as the HC at a P5 program. With Miles, guys in his past that would fit would be guys like Monken at OC, Pelini at DC,You only go get Miles, IF you also like a couple of the assistants he is bringing as potential HC candidates.
Someone like Barnett when he was hired as an assistant the first time, way back in the 80s?I wonder if CU would get more traction in state if they hired someone to an assistant position on this next staff who fits that description.
That is what I mean, you don't necessarily want to have to rely on a succession plan, but having the options in house would be wise.I don't believe you bring them in as part of a succession plan, but you do make sure that you hire the level of coordinator that could be hired as the HC at a P5 program. With Miles, guys in his past that would fit would be guys like Monken at OC, Pelini at DC,
You’re saying it’s a Hawkins-Peterson sitch?Pull a Nebraska and hire the current UCF coach.
I posted this and my posr was removed, but I was serious. Josh Heupel. He is showing success at UCF and might be a good candidate for CU. Here's a link to his bio: http://ucfknights.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=34100&ATCLID=211734077
This is fair.If Miles comes in and hires assistants like he should, the succession plan will take care of itself.
No need to orchestrate it.
So, who do you favor who fits your criteria?
We haven't had a recruiter of Lake's caliber in Boulder since EB left for UCLA.I really don't have a a candidate - some are saying Lake fits that criteria.(though I am not sure about his recruiting). Tosh Lupoi meets the Recruiting criteria but I think he needs a few more years as a DC. I really want an honest search and you never know who may rise to the top. When doing the search they will need to determine how the person will be as a manager, can they make hard decisions, how will they hire, etc. Ultimately, can they coach..
Take someone like Tee Martin - great recruiter, OC, but I do not think he has been mentored by a successful coach for any period of time (not necessarily his fault). I would interview someone like that and see if it fits. Many candidates are not going to check every box.
I think recruiting has to be a must have criteria - CU is not located in a recruiting hotbed but is not a bad place to recruit to and with the new facilities it should be a lot easier.
Maybe Aranda wants to coach out West again?
Lake
Aranda
Long
All three check a lot of boxes.
Again, I don't understand this mentality of having a "plan" for the next head coach after Miles. LM should not be brought in as a babysitter for the program, and if that's truly the case, then RG is doing it wrong.This is fair.
I guess I just want there to be a plan, and a pretty clear one at that.
I just want a plan, period. In all things. Not just possible head coaching succession.Again, I don't understand this mentality of having a "plan" for the next head coach after Miles. LM should not be brought in as a babysitter for the program, and if that's truly the case, then RG is doing it wrong.
Certain plans make sense. Like, what we'd do if RG wasn't our AD tomorrow for whatever reason. But certain plans are a waste of time and energy. Like, what we think we'll do in 5 years to replace RG if he decides to retire early.I just want a plan, period. In all things. Not just possible head coaching succession.
This program has looked rudderless since 2016.
The Hat is two years younger than Saban, lets not get carried away.This is fair.
I guess I just want there to be a plan, and a pretty clear one at that.
The idea of RG taking the Vandy job is terrifying, tbh. That would mean the President hire will have to be made in order to hire the new AD, and by the time all that's done, it's too late for anything to happen on the coaching front and it's onto year 7 of HCMM. That's just the tangible aspect of terror to be added to the idea that RG leaving would signal something awful pertaining to the leadership of the University and their support of the AD. Really need to hear Vandy hires someone else to put that rumor to bed.Certain plans make sense. Like, what we'd do if RG wasn't our AD tomorrow for whatever reason. But certain plans are a waste of time and energy. Like, what we think we'll do in 5 years to replace RG if he decides to retire early.
You only go get Miles, IF you also like a couple of the assistants he is bringing as potential HC candidates.
Yep, I'm actually becoming more paranoid by the moment.The idea of RG taking the Vandy job is terrifying, tbh. That would mean the President hire will have to be made in order to hire the new AD, and by the time all that's done, it's too late for anything to happen on the coaching front and it's onto year 7 of HCMM. That's just the tangible aspect of terror to be added to the idea that RG leaving would signal something awful pertaining to the leadership of the University and their support of the AD. Really need to hear Vandy hires someone else to put that rumor to bed.
RG will have to answer tough questions in any interview about Tumpkin. He doesn’t want to have to answer “why did you keep MM seven years?”Yep, I'm actually becoming more paranoid by the moment.
Not as terrifying as RG taking the Vandy job AFTER firing MM but BEFORE hiring a replacement. Which, because we're the Buffs, is probably going to happen. They'll install DiStephano as the Interim AD and he'll cheap out and hire the G5 flavor of the week.The idea of RG taking the Vandy job is terrifying, tbh. That would mean the President hire will have to be made in order to hire the new AD, and by the time all that's done, it's too late for anything to happen on the coaching front and it's onto year 7 of HCMM. That's just the tangible aspect of terror to be added to the idea that RG leaving would signal something awful pertaining to the leadership of the University and their support of the AD. Really need to hear Vandy hires someone else to put that rumor to bed.