Freudian slip. One of my favorite players.I agree Helton has the toughest job, but now that he has given up his MLB gig, I think he'll do alright....
Do we really know enough about Helton to call him a great coach?
With Graham, I think it more a question of whether he can sustain success at one place.
Depends on what 'great' means I suppose. I've seen enough to like him. SC wants iconic coach like Saban...don't know if Helton survives that environment.
How much of Grahams wins came from intel gathered by spying? He hasn't had an Oline and D relies on gimmicky blitzing. Gimmicks seemed to stop working last year.
You are going to have to explain this a bit more on Mora. I'm not sure what you a arguing? That's on me. I'm slow.You can criticize Mora, Graham, and Rodriguez for a lot of things, but I am not sure things are objectively worse since they took over at their respective schools.
In the case of Mora, I would say that assertion is quite faulty. In the case of Rodriguez, he did not walk into a good situation. Has he made them better? I think a little bit, but it also goes back to the question of who can they actually get if they fire him. I do not think it is a desirable job. Graham seems to be a typical ASU coach. Wins some games early, but basically zero threat to win a championship. Koetter and Erickson were mediocre too.
I think a bare minimum baseline for greatness is a conference championship.
I was more referring to Graham's track record as a head coach. Some clear success, but his reputation as a job hopper is not manufactured.
You are going to have to explain this a bit more on Mora. I'm not sure what you a arguing? That's on me. I'm slow.
I see UCLA as the most under achieving program in the nation and I don't think it's close with the second. They have everything to sell and are in an incredible recruiting ground. Yet, most years they are not even runners up to the division crown. If I remember correctly.
Mora is nothing more than a place holder in their remarkable span of hiring average coaches. IMO. And they will do it again.
For the record, I voted ASU. UCLA should be the knee jerk reaction but I just don't think they care.
I really want USC vs UCLA to matter nationality and be a huge game. Not gonna happen as long as Mora is at UCLA. They need to make a real commitment.
Helton could give them conference title. Maybe even this year.
Not a high bar to set but I do now understand what you were arguing. Thanks!He has been better than Neuheisel by just about any measure. Holic asserted UCLA is in worse shape than when he took over.
I truly believe it's a make or break season for Helton. Even going 9-3 would put him on the hot seat. Wouldn't get him fired, but would make 2018 do or die. 8-4 or worse when Troy has conference championship and playoff expectations? Firing him in that scenario wouldn't be close to the craziest thing USC has ever done.And that would go a long way in proving him to be a great coach. One great season is not enough.
Not what I said. Never said they were better under Neuheisel.He has been better than Neuheisel by just about any measure. Holic asserted UCLA is in worse shape than when he took over.
My issue with Mora is with the way he has thugged out UCLA. Every year that game is an unwatchable penalty fest. No reason to expect this year will be any different.
The criticism that I believe is most legit with Mora is that he hasn't been able to turn all that talent into a high powered offense. Not even a reliable offense. Rosen's going to have his 3rd QB coach in his 3 years and Mora has changed the offensive system/ coordinator (I think) four times now in the short time he's been there.
Klemm was an ace recruiter (whether or not his methods are approved of by the NCAA). His on-field coaching and his blocking schemes were sub-par. Couple that with constant changes to coordinator schemes and it's a disaster. Takes a great OL coach to continually switch that stuff.More succintly, the inability to develop the OL has been the glaring issue.