What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2022 Transfer Portal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oklahoma didn't put up the offensive numbers last year like they had in prior years, but where you set the o/u would have made him WR2.
You have a negative outlook given your answers.

o/U 32 catches
O/U 550 yards

Even with Baker, Kyler and Hurts at QB, those are typically WR2/3 numbers in that offense. Damn, I didn't realize that was the case. If he's truly WR4/5, it'll be Under in both of those for sure
 
Oklahoma didn't put up the offensive numbers last year like they had in prior years, but where you set the o/u would have made him WR2.
Spencer Rattler playing a lot and not pushing the all down the field had a big impact on those figures. Caleb Williams as the main man will make their offense look much more like Lincoln Riley offenses in the past - 4Kish yards with 6-7 guys making up those numbers.
 
Spencer Rattler playing a lot and not pushing the all down the field had a big impact on those figures. Caleb Williams as the main man will make their offense look much more like Lincoln Riley offenses in the past - 4Kish yards with 6-7 guys making up those numbers.
Even with Baker, Kyler and Hurts, that offense didn't spread it out as much as you think. The numbers @hawg1 suggested are more along the lines of WR2/3 in that offense with Heisman Trophy caliber QB play.
 
Spencer Rattler playing a lot and not pushing the all down the field had a big impact on those figures. Caleb Williams as the main man will make their offense look much more like Lincoln Riley offenses in the past - 4Kish yards with 6-7 guys making up those numbers.
Ypa was about a yard different between the two.
 
Even with Baker, Kyler and Hurts, that offense didn't spread it out as much as you think. The numbers @hawg1 suggested are more along the lines of WR2/3 in that offense with Heisman Trophy caliber QB play.
I think 550 is high. 375-400? Doable. I think it also depends on how well competition and injuries shake out.
 
2017 with Mayfield - Mark Andrews is/was a TE, so you're look at 32 and 550 being WR3

1653076949077.png

2018 w Kyler - WR3

1653077036830.png

2019 w Hurts - WR3

1653077089998.png

So, yeah, realistically, if Rice is WR4-5 this year, he's probably look at something like 20/350/1 as his stat line.

For reference, he had 21/299/3 last year at CU. I think it's probably the best move for him to go to USC, but I think it's naïve to say he's in a much better personal situation than being WR1 at CU.
 
It appears he will to me. And Athletic beat writer. But you be you.

He's running 3rd string here.
OK. I’ll split the difference with you, Yak, for an even money $5 donation to NiL on each prop.

23.5/449.5
I'll take the under here as well. 5 bucks on each to the CU NIL.
 

He's running 3rd string here.

I'll take the under here as well. 5 bucks on each to the CU NIL.
Nope you are late (only for yak) and did you really post a DC from Ourlads? Keep your powder dry for anti-Mel bets.
 
I will record CU games and not plan my Saturday's around them any more. I will follow them, be bummed more than happy but will still follow them. I will likely watch and become more of an NFL Fan and Bronco Fan for sure with RW here. I will go to more Avs games and spend my money on teams that are exciting and want to win. Will keep my BBall tix at CU until they run Tad off and kill that program as well (or keep them if they show they want a winner when he retires).

Bottom line, college football will be more of an interest but not a passion anymore (unless the youngest picks a real football school to attend in 3 years! I can hope). It was for a long time but the fact that CU has thrown in the towel is killing it for me.
👆🏼This is me. I’ve got my new college football* team to root for, and I was laying in bed this morning actually contemplating whether it not to get Sling merely for the Pac-12 network when I can watch all of said “other” football team without paying anything extra.

*also to 25 baseball, basketball, softball, gymnastics, men’s golf, women’s golf, mens track&field, women’s track & field, men’s cross country, women’s cross country, women’s soccer
(Many of which are actually top 10)
 
His name isn't even on that tweet. Oh no Brenden!
The Office Lol GIF
 

He's running 3rd string here.

I'll take the under here as well. 5 bucks on each to the CU NIL.
Sure he’s “3 deep”. Problem here is - there could be 6 receivers seeing the field before he does.
 
Sure he’s “3 deep”. Problem here is - there could be 6 receivers seeing the field before he does.
Even worse, as that assumes that he gets on field before the third string X or A receiver. If he’s behind those guys, depending on scheme for a week, he could be the 8th receiver in line. He is also only clearly listed above ONE receiver in the entire depth chart of ten receivers, which does not seem to include freshman coming in.
 
Last edited:
Even worse, as that assumes that he gets on field before the third string X or A receiver. If he’s behind those guys, depending on scheme for a week, he could be the 8th receiver in line. He is also only clearly listed above ONE receiver in the entire depth chart of ten receivers, which does not seem to include freshman coming in.
starter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top