What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

'20 CO SG Dominique Clifford (SIGNED to COLORADO)

The NBA is a joke. This is one more log for that fire. Roddy was twice the player Clifford is and well, you can see how that's going.
It's a damn weak draft. No shade to Nique because he worked his ass off and got better since he left here, but yeah...
 
Man, everything I've read has said otherwise. The top is pretty good but it seems like the middle drops pretty hard.

That said, I am a moron so I could have this completely wrong.
Or it could be one of those drafts where the scouts and media aren't sure what they are looking at. A lot of prospects in this draft who are hard to get a good take on.

Dominique is one of those. Is he the guy who balled out and dominated games in the MWC last year and carried his team in the tourney or is the guy who struggled to consistently contribute for Colorado against better competition?

The people who say it is a deep draft can make good arguments but so can those who see a lot of question marks. The number of guys who are coming from outside the US and haven't been seem a lot against known competition adds to this, but also creates some real opportunity to find quality players outside of the lottery picks.
 
Or it could be one of those drafts where the scouts and media aren't sure what they are looking at. A lot of prospects in this draft who are hard to get a good take on.

Dominique is one of those. Is he the guy who balled out and dominated games in the MWC last year and carried his team in the tourney or is the guy who struggled to consistently contribute for Colorado against better competition?

The people who say it is a deep draft can make good arguments but so can those who see a lot of question marks. The number of guys who are coming from outside the US and haven't been seem a lot against known competition adds to this, but also creates some real opportunity to find quality players outside of the lottery picks.
I think the biggest thing for Nique is if his 3 point shot will translate. shot 37% the last two years at CSU after 28% in his last year with the buffs. Will need that in the NBA. From an athleticism perspective that's always been there and his rebounding numbers really jump off the page. He was 14th in the nation in rebounds per game as a 6'6 guard and that normally translates.
 
Man, everything I've read has said otherwise. The top is pretty good but it seems like the middle drops pretty hard.

That said, I am a moron so I could have this completely wrong.
I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.

I mean…the AI summary is literally a summary of all the available material in a subject.

IMG_3966.png
 
I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.

I mean…the AI summary is literally a summary of all the available material in a subject.

View attachment 87923
Thanks for the AI answer. Most GMs are freaked that the talent is sparse after the Top 2-3. There are some straight up bums projected to go in the first 20.
 
I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.

I mean…the AI summary is literally a summary of all the available material in a subject.

View attachment 87923
I know heading into last year's draft it was much higher. And it is much higher at the top - no one argues that. But it seems like there's a bit of a drop off. The talk with Cody was he had to go pro last year because he would be a top 5-10 pick. This year he'd probably be around 15. Which is a drop but not as far as some of us (myself) thought he would drop if he came back - which was around 25.
 
I know heading into last year's draft it was much higher. And it is much higher at the top - no one argues that. But it seems like there's a bit of a drop off. The talk with Cody was he had to go pro last year because he would be a top 5-10 pick. This year he'd probably be around 15. Which is a drop but not as far as some of us (myself) thought he would drop if he came back - which was around 25.
I think this draft could be as good as 2011 (Kyrie, Klay, Kawhi, Butler, etc). But like that year, it's a scary one for GMs because they don't know if there's better value at 30 (Butler) than in the late lottery (Jimmer Fredette). I think we have a lot of talent but an absolute crap shoot.
 
I think this draft could be as good as 2011 (Kyrie, Klay, Kawhi, Butler, etc). But like that year, it's a scary one for GMs because they don't know if there's better value at 30 (Butler) than in the late lottery (Jimmer Fredette). I think we have a lot of talent but an absolute crap shoot.
What I have heard is that there are a lot of guys outside of the top group who look good but have a high potential to be wasted picks that don't pan out. More overall upside but also more risk.

This article includes that guy who some have looked at as the potential 3rd pick in the draft in Bailey.

Draft bust

If a guy is 3 inches shorter than advertised and known in college for taking bad shots it has to make whoever picks him worried.
 
Thanks for the AI answer. Most GMs are freaked that the talent is sparse after the Top 2-3. There are some straight up bums projected to go in the first 20.
That’s fair…but I don’t think it’s sparse “talent”…

There’s a lot of talent, but the NBA continues to over rely on projection instead of production.

Like you said about Roddy. Better college player by orders of magnitude than Nique, but Nique’s athletic profile is much better than Roddy’s.

Granted, you’d think that athletic profile wouldn’t be as enticing when a guy has been in college for five years already.
 
I think Nique has good tools and skills for where he was drafted. He's really good sized for an NBA 2. He can guard, rebound and dribble. His pick and roll usage sky-rocketed at CSU. Assuming his 3 ball doesn't crater, he's on the path to being a really versatile player who can't get played off the floor in a playoff game. Even if he's never somebody's first or second leading scorer, that's pretty valuable.
 
I think Nique has good tools and skills for where he was drafted. He's really good sized for an NBA 2. He can guard, rebound and dribble. His pick and roll usage sky-rocketed at CSU. Assuming his 3 ball doesn't crater, he's on the path to being a really versatile player who can't get played off the floor in a playoff game. Even if he's never somebody's first or second leading scorer, that's pretty valuable.
He is D White 2.0
Work hard, get better, take in coaching (both his college coaches are good developers)
I can fully eat crow for any comments about him and am proud of him
Funny how he is a forever Buff when we kind of kicked him to the curb because of Cody
Congrats to him, he can now light the Beam
 
Sometimes the best team doesn't win the Dance. That comeback win by Houston is underrated right now but we'll look back at it as historic.
Shvt, I think 3 of them were in the top 10. That's like Kentucky with Calipari.
Sometimes the talent is enough but basketball is still a team game and it is still a game of fundamentals.

We keep seeing these super teams of 5* recruits fall short while teams that are still highly talented but not to the same level succeed with a core of players who are in the system for multiple years and each plays his role helping the team win.
 
Sometimes the talent is enough but basketball is still a team game and it is still a game of fundamentals.

We keep seeing these super teams of 5* recruits fall short while teams that are still highly talented but not to the same level succeed with a core of players who are in the system for multiple years and each plays his role helping the team win.
Not the case with this year's Duke team. They had great chemistry.
 
Not the case with this year's Duke team. They had great chemistry.
Don't know about great chemisty but they were a very good team with the kind of players that allow for great chemistry, highly talented but team first guys. Lost close in the final four in a close game but lost to a team that had two players in their 5th years and one in his 4th providing 53 of their 70 points. None of these three were drafted.

Again the Duke team had better chemistry than most of these teams put together from one and done talent but they still ended up losing to a team that it is easy to argue was much less talented.

The eventual champion Florida did have three players picked but the first one was the 18th pick, two were seniors, one was a 5th year senior. Again easy to argue less talented than Duke.
 
Back
Top