The NBA is a joke. This is one more log for that fire. Roddy was twice the player Clifford is and well, you can see how that's going.Received a green room invite for the draft
The NBA is a joke. This is one more log for that fire. Roddy was twice the player Clifford is and well, you can see how that's going.Received a green room invite for the draft
He has come a long wayAged well.
It's a damn weak draft. No shade to Nique because he worked his ass off and got better since he left here, but yeah...The NBA is a joke. This is one more log for that fire. Roddy was twice the player Clifford is and well, you can see how that's going.
It’s actually considered a pretty strong draftIt's a damn weak draft. No shade to Nique because he worked his ass off and got better since he left here, but yeah...
Man, everything I've read has said otherwise. The top is pretty good but it seems like the middle drops pretty hard.It’s actually considered a pretty strong draft![]()
Or it could be one of those drafts where the scouts and media aren't sure what they are looking at. A lot of prospects in this draft who are hard to get a good take on.Man, everything I've read has said otherwise. The top is pretty good but it seems like the middle drops pretty hard.
That said, I am a moron so I could have this completely wrong.
I think the biggest thing for Nique is if his 3 point shot will translate. shot 37% the last two years at CSU after 28% in his last year with the buffs. Will need that in the NBA. From an athleticism perspective that's always been there and his rebounding numbers really jump off the page. He was 14th in the nation in rebounds per game as a 6'6 guard and that normally translates.Or it could be one of those drafts where the scouts and media aren't sure what they are looking at. A lot of prospects in this draft who are hard to get a good take on.
Dominique is one of those. Is he the guy who balled out and dominated games in the MWC last year and carried his team in the tourney or is the guy who struggled to consistently contribute for Colorado against better competition?
The people who say it is a deep draft can make good arguments but so can those who see a lot of question marks. The number of guys who are coming from outside the US and haven't been seem a lot against known competition adds to this, but also creates some real opportunity to find quality players outside of the lottery picks.
I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.Man, everything I've read has said otherwise. The top is pretty good but it seems like the middle drops pretty hard.
That said, I am a moron so I could have this completely wrong.
Thanks for the AI answer. Most GMs are freaked that the talent is sparse after the Top 2-3. There are some straight up bums projected to go in the first 20.I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.
I mean…the AI summary is literally a summary of all the available material in a subject.
View attachment 87923
I know heading into last year's draft it was much higher. And it is much higher at the top - no one argues that. But it seems like there's a bit of a drop off. The talk with Cody was he had to go pro last year because he would be a top 5-10 pick. This year he'd probably be around 15. Which is a drop but not as far as some of us (myself) thought he would drop if he came back - which was around 25.I’m not sure where you’re looking, but the talk of this class since…last year was that it was a strong class…and much stronger than last years.
I mean…the AI summary is literally a summary of all the available material in a subject.
View attachment 87923
I think this draft could be as good as 2011 (Kyrie, Klay, Kawhi, Butler, etc). But like that year, it's a scary one for GMs because they don't know if there's better value at 30 (Butler) than in the late lottery (Jimmer Fredette). I think we have a lot of talent but an absolute crap shoot.I know heading into last year's draft it was much higher. And it is much higher at the top - no one argues that. But it seems like there's a bit of a drop off. The talk with Cody was he had to go pro last year because he would be a top 5-10 pick. This year he'd probably be around 15. Which is a drop but not as far as some of us (myself) thought he would drop if he came back - which was around 25.
What I have heard is that there are a lot of guys outside of the top group who look good but have a high potential to be wasted picks that don't pan out. More overall upside but also more risk.I think this draft could be as good as 2011 (Kyrie, Klay, Kawhi, Butler, etc). But like that year, it's a scary one for GMs because they don't know if there's better value at 30 (Butler) than in the late lottery (Jimmer Fredette). I think we have a lot of talent but an absolute crap shoot.
![]()
2011 NBA draft - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
That’s fair…but I don’t think it’s sparse “talent”…Thanks for the AI answer. Most GMs are freaked that the talent is sparse after the Top 2-3. There are some straight up bums projected to go in the first 20.
Received a green room invite for the draft
He is D White 2.0I think Nique has good tools and skills for where he was drafted. He's really good sized for an NBA 2. He can guard, rebound and dribble. His pick and roll usage sky-rocketed at CSU. Assuming his 3 ball doesn't crater, he's on the path to being a really versatile player who can't get played off the floor in a playoff game. Even if he's never somebody's first or second leading scorer, that's pretty valuable.
He reminds me a bit of DikembeThat big man from Duke might also be a very good player.
Yeah but a better shooter.He reminds me a bit of Dikembe
Sometimes the best team doesn't win the Dance. That comeback win by Houston is underrated right now but we'll look back at it as historic.Crazy Duke had their entire starting 5 drafted
Sometimes the best team doesn't win the Dance. That comeback win by Houston is underrated right now but we'll look back at it as historic.
Shvt, I think 3 of them were in the top 10. That's like Kentucky with Calipari.Crazy Duke had their entire starting 5 drafted
Sometimes the best team doesn't win the Dance. That comeback win by Houston is underrated right now but we'll look back at it as historic.
Sometimes the talent is enough but basketball is still a team game and it is still a game of fundamentals.Shvt, I think 3 of them were in the top 10. That's like Kentucky with Calipari.
Not the case with this year's Duke team. They had great chemistry.Sometimes the talent is enough but basketball is still a team game and it is still a game of fundamentals.
We keep seeing these super teams of 5* recruits fall short while teams that are still highly talented but not to the same level succeed with a core of players who are in the system for multiple years and each plays his role helping the team win.
Don't know about great chemisty but they were a very good team with the kind of players that allow for great chemistry, highly talented but team first guys. Lost close in the final four in a close game but lost to a team that had two players in their 5th years and one in his 4th providing 53 of their 70 points. None of these three were drafted.Not the case with this year's Duke team. They had great chemistry.