Yeah. Most do. It helps to be able to sift through that stuff. You can also put certain people on ignore.
Honestly, Chambers is exactly the type of hire we need to jump-start Texas recruiting. What we are doing right now is not working.
:nod: I am blissfully unaware of any undef posts. So much better after ignored posters being quoted got blocked.
That makes you a lot like undefeated. (I'm not dissing you)
Mtn - Bobby Kennedy did a very good job here. The assistant coaching under Embree was not an issue in the least. Those issues were at the HC and OC/DC spots. The rest of that staff was a solid P5 coaching staff. And CU recruited Texas much better under Embree's group that it has under MacIntyre's.
WTF??? That's pure Baloney! They were "credentialed" but hardly did a good job with player development, team morale and working on the academic side of things, all of which should be an assistant's primary goal. Those coaches did nothing to overcome the strife at the upper level. Screaming expletives at players after you wear them out at practices which don't teach them anything or letting locker room rifts develop or allowing team attitudes totally deteriorate (creating the "Ladies Night" mentality) isn't the sign of a "solid P5" group.
As a result, it's taken two years to get out of the funk created by those "solid P5" assistants!!!
WTF??? That's pure Baloney! They were "credentialed" but hardly did a good job with player development, team morale and working on the academic side of things, all of which should be an assistant's primary goal. Those coaches did nothing to overcome the strife at the upper level. Screaming expletives at players after you wear them out at practices which don't teach them anything or letting locker room rifts develop or allowing team attitudes totally deteriorate (creating the "Ladies Night" mentality) isn't the sign of a "solid P5" group.
As a result, it's taken two years to get out of the funk created by those "solid P5" assistants!!!
Chambers may be a notch up in recruiting that area from what we have now but it's not worth it to me. Hasn't produced much of anything in terms of on-field talent for years at his position and recruiting to a state brand that should come very close to selling itself had been abysmal. That's why he was fired today in the first place, not because of the bowl performance. It was to get a head start on future recruiting classes by bringing in new coaches.
It doesn't have to be Chambers, but we need someone with direct ties to Texas who has been recruiting the state for the last several years.
The problem at UT has not been recruiting (except at QB). They'll be right at the top of schools on # of players taken in this year's draft.
Overrated and lazy according to what I've been readingChambers was, from 2005-2013, not just on the staff for the Longhorns, but was their recruiting coordinator. This strongly suggests to me, he would have tie-ins with schools throughout Texas and could help us get our foot in the door very quickly on the strength of those relationships. Think you're selling the guy a bit short, Mtn. He may not be the dynamic recruiter we'd like, but he would certainly be a guy who provides better access to Texas prep players.
Overrated and lazy according to what I've been reading
I can't imagine the frustration being a Wisconsin fan, watching Stave sling a football. Everytime he rears back, who knows where it's gonna end up.
Overrated and lazy according to what I've been reading
And this is what I am afraid of.
I'm not close to the situation down there but based on recent years of results and the fact that he got fired from the job he's got I would worry. A good portion of the schools in the country recruit Texas, doesn't seem like he has a rush of schools coming after him.
I could be entirely wrong. The failures and deficiencies could have been due to Mack Brown or other factors. It is also possible that he has been coasting but getting fired might be enough to wake him up again and get him moving.
The question is can we afford to take the risk in finding out. I'd rather we go after somebody who has the energy and the motivation and wants to establish a name for themselves rather than live off the one they have.
And this is what I am afraid of.
I'm not close to the situation down there but based on recent years of results and the fact that he got fired from the job he's got I would worry. A good portion of the schools in the country recruit Texas, doesn't seem like he has a rush of schools coming after him.
I could be entirely wrong. The failures and deficiencies could have been due to Mack Brown or other factors. It is also possible that he has been coasting but getting fired might be enough to wake him up again and get him moving.
The question is can we afford to take the risk in finding out. I'd rather we go after somebody who has the energy and the motivation and wants to establish a name for themselves rather than live off the one they have.
Good postOnce again, there is a difference between recruiting and player evaluation. Texas gets the players they want - they are great at recruiting. Those players aren't always what they are projected to be - they are mediocre at player evaluation. We need to start getting the players that we are targeting- we suck at recruiting.
Chizik to UNC as the DC, not a bad plan B after Durkin.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12109040/former-auburn-tigers-coach-gene-chizik-accepts-job-north-carolina-tar-heels-defensive-coordinator
Once again, there is a difference between recruiting and player evaluation. Texas gets the players they want - they are great at recruiting. Those players aren't always what they are projected to be - they are mediocre at player evaluation. We need to start getting the players that we are targeting- we suck at recruiting.
How do we know the players we are targeting are what they are projected to be?
How do we know the players we are targeting are what they are projected to be?
A good start is look at the players we brought in on Junior Day. We landed like two of 10.
That just means we are not getting who we are targeting.