ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Judging conference strength based on bowls is a really dumb exercise.
We were also the only league who put two teams with at least two losses in its conference title game. That kind of says it all there no?
Judging conference strength based on bowls is a really dumb exercise.
You’re right. The fact that the Pac will most likely end the season without a team ranked in the top 10 or maybe 15 is a better way.Judging conference strength based on bowls is a really dumb exercise.
While everything you say is true, going forward, I’m not sure I can agree. Time will tell if I’m right or wrong.Whoa, whoa, whoa.
DON'T LOSE YOUR COMPOSURE! EVERYBODY SETTLE DOWN!
The Pac is a disaster in bowl games this season. Tragically bad. It's a horrible optic for a conference that is struggling for positive exposure.
Noted.
And, I admit to being a bit of a hypocrite. When our conference performs well in bowls, I view it as a sign that my conference is awesome, and by proxy, I too am awesome. And when our team, or conference stinks it up in bowls, it's a reminder that the college football landscape is ever changing.
I acknowledge that the southeastern U.S. is football crazy. I've lived in Florida; it's a different level. I've lived in Texas. They take football pretty seriously. Similarly, I acknowledge that the SEC fan energy level, tailgate experience etc... is unparalleled at a conference level.
And...
The football landscape changes. The Pac is often in the top two conferences in bowl record and out of conference season record. It's a great conference having a bad year. A few years ago when the SEC West went, like, 1-5 in bowl games, nobody said that they came from a poor football culture and that's why they sucked. We just knew that they would reload and be back. We accepted that sometimes conferences and divisions are down for a season or two.
The Pac will be back. Just a bad season. And yes, I agree there is a different culture in the west.
Settle the **** down everybody.
I’d take the one from Georgia.While everything you say is true, going forward, I’m not sure I can agree. Time will tell if I’m right or wrong.
Personally, I just see a fundamental shift. Let me put it this way...
CU only has room for one ILB (as if ... but follow me here).
Two kids have CU #1.
One is a 5* from California with offers from everyone. The other is a 4* from Texas with offers from everyone.
Who do you take?
Personally, I’ll take the kid from Texas every time.
I hope I’m off the mark here and until I see a PAC-12 team go out and dominate another P5 team in a game that matters, I think I’ll stick with my tune. YMMV
This is a floundering conference hamstrung by ever-lagging TV revenues which influences quality of coaches, ACs, support personnel, facilities, recruiting etc in a region that does not value college football.so the bowl record only matters if its bad? gotcha.
This is a floundering conference hamstrung by ever-lagging TV tevenurs which influences quality of coaches ...
I like how most site members rip the Pac 12 for network, Commish, distribution, tv time slots, $$$, national pub, etc for 350 days/year, and then the conference teams have the worst bowl season of any major conference in history (according to Wilner), and many posters come out and downplay it as no big deal. Weird.
Wisconsin can suck a fat dick. In every sport. Forever.Brain freeze by Pettis. Too bad ... would have liked to see a Hail Mary on the last play of the game.
Now ... GO WISCY!!!
Wisconsin can suck a fat dick. In every sport. Forever.
Having an identity matters.
More on Wisconsin and the importance of having an identity:
Wisconsin can suck a fat dick. In every sport. Forever.
More on Wisconsin and the importance of having an identity:
Big Ten has the best coaches right now of all the conferences. This is where the media revenue is really showing up.