What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2018-2019 Coaching Carousel..

Which job and which school is better or worse and why?

COLORADO v TEXAS TECH
CU has the richer history and tradition. More wins, better winning percentage, natty, more conference titles and of course Boulder v Lubbick. Tech has a better bowl record and is located in the the second most fertile recruiting state in the country, but they also play 3rd or maybe even 4th or 5th fiddle at the point in their own state to UT and A&M, if not TCU and Baylor as well.

I would say CU is probably the better job, but I'm biased.
 
CU has the richer history and tradition. More wins, better winning percentage, natty, more conference titles and of course Boulder v Lubbick. Tech has a better bowl record and is located in the the second most fertile recruiting state in the country, but they also play 3rd or maybe even 4th or 5th fiddle at the point in their own state to UT and A&M, if not TCU and Baylor as well.

I would say CU is probably the better job, but I'm biased.
In addition, CU’s facilities top TTUs.
 
CU is the better job. Tech is well down the pecking order in Texas. Harder for Tech to compete in a round robin Big 12 than CU in the Pac-12 South.
 
I had hoped that everyone agreed that Colorado is better than Texas Tech, but wanted to hear it. I think Colorado is a far far better job, but if we do not hit it out of the park this time, then we risk moving farther and farther down the order of legitimate programs. TT has gotten a little too much attention as if they have actually won something or done something. TT is a joke, in a joke town, and we must rise back up.
 
Do any of you see Mike Mac taking a step down to become a DC at a top school?

I don’t. He came across much more arrogant than I originally thought. He was constantly pointing fingers and saying he had better opportunities. I don’t see him swallowing his pride, he’ll want to be a HC
 
Do any of you see Mike Mac taking a step down to become a DC at a top school?
If he doesn't have another desirable HC option, yes, but once you become a HC for as long as he was (almost a decade), I think the idea of transitioning to a coordinator can be less than appealing. IMO, Mac is going to have to choose between being a DC for a P5 program or going back to the G5 ranks as a HC in order to turnaround yet another program and try to launch himself into another P5 HC job.
 
If he doesn't have another desirable HC option, yes, but once you become a HC for as long as he was (almost a decade), I think the idea of transitioning to a coordinator can be less than appealing. IMO, Mac is going to have to choose between being a DC for a P5 program or going back to the G5 ranks as a HC in order to turnaround yet another program and try to launch himself into another P5 HC job.
Maybe he should go get some recruiting religion from Saban for a year, then he will have a good chance at another P5 job.
 
Crap, presumably Brohm staying puts them back in the same pool as us. I expect they’ll take a hard look at Day and Schiano, as well SEC coordinators like Aranda, Tucker, and Lupoi.

Edit: I missed the tweet about Satterfield.
 
Crap, presumably Brohm staying puts them back in the same pool as us. I expect they’ll take a hard look at Day and Schiano, as well SEC coordinators like Aranda, Tucker, and Lupoi.

Edit: I missed the tweet about Satterfield.
Barry Odom
 
Crap, presumably Brohm staying puts them back in the same pool as us. I expect they’ll take a hard look at Day and Schiano, as well SEC coordinators like Aranda, Tucker, and Lupoi.

Edit: I missed the tweet about Satterfield.

Brohm leaving would've put them in play for Day as well, I guess. So you can look at it either way, but if Day is our guy I think it's reasonable to believe that we might too far down the road with him for him to change his mind.
 
Louisville has a lot of money. Close to the recruiting hotbed that is the southeast. Much better recent success and presence in the NFL. Louisville is the better job by far. Sad to say that.
 
Louisville has a lot of money. Close to the recruiting hotbed that is the southeast. Much better recent success and presence in the NFL. Louisville is the better job by far. Sad to say that.
What does the bold even mean above? They recently have sucked. Purdue is decent. Who cares about how many guys went to the NFL 4 years ago? They suck pigeon dicks the last few years.
 
What does the bold even mean above? They recently have sucked. Purdue is decent. Who cares about how many guys went to the NFL 4 years ago? They suck pigeon dicks the last few years.

Louisville has been to bowl games 8 times in the last decade and they’ve won 4 of those. They have a recent Heisman winner.

Purdue has 3 bowls and 2 wins in the last decade.

To get to the last 4 bowls CU has won, we go all the way back to Slick Rick and the 1996 Holiday bowl.

Louisville has had a bad couple of years, but that is a program that has had a lot of recent success.
 
Back
Top