What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2020 CU football season POSTPONED until Nov 6th?

That depends on the sport. I believe the NFL isn't going to be hurt real hard with no fans in the stands for a season..I still think we'll have CFB at some point during this academic year.
NFL has been gearing its socialist economic model toward TV for decades. But, colleges rely on gameday for a big portion of revenues.
 
I guess where employee salaries differ by two orders of magnitude and team revenues differ by 3x (revenue sharing notwithstanding) my head doesn't leap to "socialism"
 
Player salaries are entirely Capitalistic. The team revenue/profit model is Socialistic
Not entirely. Rookie deals are slotted mostly with some minor room for negotiation. Franchise tag numbers are set by the league as are RFA compensation rates. The hard salary cap and negotiated salary floor really normalize compensation for players. Very socialist across the board.
 
The players and coaches are the ones who are vocal about wanting to play. The administrators don't give a **** about their health, they simply don't want to be liable for anything.
Want isn't a question here. Lots of people "want" things.

What matters is what is the right thing.

Liability is a big part of it. Liability comes from doing something that results in someone being harmed, and it doesn't go away just because they wanted to do it.
 
Not entirely. Rookie deals are slotted mostly with some minor room for negotiation. Franchise tag numbers are set by the league as are RFA compensation rates. The hard salary cap and negotiated salary floor really normalize compensation for players. Very socialist across the board.
That's fair, although I would say that Rookie deals are substantially different depending on where they are selected, so that in an of itself makes it Capitalistic. Franchise tags numbers are set by the league based on the average of top market negotiated contracts for that position. There is also nothing normalized about one player being able to sign a half billion dollar contract while another player signs for 3 years, $15m.
 
Want isn't a question here. Lots of people "want" things.

What matters is what is the right thing.

Liability is a big part of it. Liability comes from doing something that results in someone being harmed, and it doesn't go away just because they wanted to do it.
You love to constantly be the arbiter of what's right for other people.
 
Administrators are dealing with far, far more than that. Sometimes the football fans get very myopic.

Here is an example that I heard from a parent of an incoming freshman at CU. "My son is starting at CU in the Fall, but he is is in 90% online classes, with just a few recitations in-person... yet the football players can gather together and play a sport AND CU is thinking about putting fans in the stands? I should just have my kid go to community college for the term"

This isn't just a matter of football players wanting to take on the risk. Covid has never been about individual risk! It is a highly contagious virus that impacts everyone. So administrators are trying to figure out how they can allow the football team playing while also having students in 90% online classes. Or how they can keep staff that may have to interact with football players safe from infection, since the football players are not in a bubble (we just saw last week what happened at CSU). They are trying to figure out how to message to parents that their kids should stay enrolled and pay tuition for a reduced experience, while allowing football players to do their thing.

I've been saying it for months, but football is really just a minor concern for University leadership right now. They have much bigger fish to fry.
Completely agree, this goes way beyond playing football or not. Colleges desperately need students back on campus in the fall so they are doing everything in their power to make it happen. They are calling it mixed online and in person teaching, when in reality pretty much everything is going to be online except an occasional recitation or lab.
 
That's fair, although I would say that Rookie deals are substantially different depending on where they are selected, so that in an of itself makes it Capitalistic. Franchise tags numbers are set by the league based on the average of top market negotiated contracts for that position. There is also nothing normalized about one player being able to sign a half billion dollar contract while another player signs for 3 years, $15m.
Contracts at the margins don’t disprove the rule of normalized contracts. Far more NFL players make near the minimum than maximums.

And, the rookie scale is not at all capitalist. Your number is set by your draft position, which came from worst/best seeding. There’s basically no negotiation on the amount or even the years. That there’s even a thing called a draft is entirely a socialist concept. If it were capitalism, teams would be able to bid and negotiate for player services from the outset.

BTW, the free agency markets are quasi-capitalism. There are tons of rules about contact and the amount of the contract (salary cap). Forcing a franchised to play a one year deal under this averaged dollar figure is not capitalism.

There are market experiments in the NFL, but the atmosphere is entirely controlled and governed by the rules to protect the collective.
 
If these adult players want to play, why can't there be a release of liability from the Universities they can all sign?

The student athlete can certainly sign something that says they won't sue, and I even think they can include their assignees and heirs but that won't stop a class action lawsuit from parents.

I'm almost every state the family of the deceased can sue for wrongful death.
 
So with all the talk about players, no one has really discussed the officials. I asked a guy I work with who is a high school official if he was working any games and he said no. 3 of his crew are opting out due to Covid and one is just hanging it up. Said even if schools want to play they are going to be short on officials. Most of those guys are older, at risk themselves or have household members that are at risk. I imagine it is similar in the college ranks as well. Even the NFL guys are not full time employees. There is so much to consider in having games beyond players and coaches, I don't see how it could be pulled off effectively.
 
So with all the talk about players, no one has really discussed the officials. I asked a guy I work with who is a high school official if he was working any games and he said no. 3 of his crew are opting out due to Covid and one is just hanging it up. Said even if schools want to play they are going to be short on officials. Most of those guys are older, at risk themselves or have household members that are at risk. I imagine it is similar in the college ranks as well. Even the NFL guys are not full time employees. There is so much to consider in having games beyond players and coaches, I don't see how it could be pulled off effectively.
Absolutely, also at the college and pro level you have training and medical staff and the equipment staff.
For these people distancing is nearly impossible.
 
Wilner is not necessarily wrong, but the time for a plan was awhile ago.
Kind of hard to plan when the landscape changes daily. I’d imagine they did have a plan a while ago, and they had to throw that plan out the window.
 
So with all the talk about players, no one has really discussed the officials. I asked a guy I work with who is a high school official if he was working any games and he said no. 3 of his crew are opting out due to Covid and one is just hanging it up. Said even if schools want to play they are going to be short on officials. Most of those guys are older, at risk themselves or have household members that are at risk. I imagine it is similar in the college ranks as well. Even the NFL guys are not full time employees. There is so much to consider in having games beyond players and coaches, I don't see how it could be pulled off effectively.

He in Colorado if you don't mind me asking? Last I heard high school football is a March through May season here. I do basketball, and we start right after Polis' moratorium on high school sports (Oct. 17-Jan. 4 to account for data showing a bump in COVID cases).

Officiating shortages are normal though. I have friends I know through basketball who do football, and its not as noticeable there because that's a Thursday-Saturday sport for the most part-but we see it every year. Most people who do basketball work games most weeknights and Saturday mornings. Its probably going to be worse this year, and that's a big reason why I decided to bite the bullet and return.
 
Back
Top