What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2024 Colorado Haters Thread

Everyone will forget the name of Boise’s RB pretty quickly. Or he’ll kill it in the NFL and be remembered for his NFL team and not boise

In a couple years from now, some true die hards will mayyybe say “Boise had that good RB a few years ago, I think ‘X player’ is kinda like that guy. You remember what his name was?”

Lol
 
I just don’t know, Idaho. Ya’ll are some sad mothafvckas.
Daniel Day Lewis GIF
 
Everyone will forget the name of Boise’s RB pretty quickly. Or he’ll kill it in the NFL and be remembered for his NFL team and not boise

Even some true die hards will mayyybe say “Boise had that good RB a few years ago, I think ‘X player’ is kinda like that guy. You remember what his name was?”

Lol
Jeanty is a great college RB who I think will be excellent in the NFL.

No reason to tear him down. Travis stands alone. Modern football hasn't seen someone like him before and it's highly doubtful that we'd ever see this again.

I keep thinking of some of the old records in baseball. Travis would be like an MLB pitcher taking the hill every third day and throwing a complete game every start. It just doesn't happen anymore.
 
Jeanty is a great college RB who I think will be excellent in the NFL.

No reason to tear him down. Travis stands alone. Modern football hasn't seen someone like him before and it's highly doubtful that we'd ever see this again.

I keep thinking of some of the old records in baseball. Travis would be like an MLB pitcher taking the hill every third day and throwing a complete game every start. It just doesn't happen anymore.
I’m not tearing anything down, he’s a great player.

That’s just how these things work

SNL put it best: Who was Hillary’s VP? In a year, we’ll ask ourselves, who is Tim Walz? Who was Romney’s VP?

That’s showbiz. Losers disappear
 
Last edited:
I was arguing with someone on Reddit about this last night, and it spurned my post in the haters thread.

Hunter won an award for best WR and best defensive player. And the response to that was 'everyone knows he didn't deserve it'.

So I asked what stats would someone look at to be considered the best at CB or WR, and it was crickets.

It is weird to me that people look at Hunters numbers and think 'pretty good' and not marvel that there is an elite player who plays every snap of a football game.
 
Consistent theme of the folks who are publicly saying they voted Jeanty first is that they prioritized Boise being in the playoffs and didn’t think they would be without him. Not a criteria I would use, particularly since we missed the CCG based on tiebreakers.
There is an argument to be made for Jeanty being ranked #1 (not a correct one). But to leave Hunter completely off the ballot lacks awareness about who’s who in college football.
 
I will never understand why media folks are given a vote in the Heisman or why an AP poll exists in the first place. You’re telling me the Alabama equivalent of Brian Howell knows **** all about any team outside of the SEC? No shot.

Heisman should be former Heisman winners and current coaches. Even then I think current coaches is a stretch because they don’t have time to watch other teams outside of film review.

AP poll shouldn’t exist period.
 
I will never understand why media folks are given a vote in the Heisman or why an AP poll exists in the first place. You’re telling me the Alabama equivalent of Brian Howell knows **** all about any team outside of the SEC? No shot.

Heisman should be former Heisman winners and current coaches. Even then I think current coaches is a stretch because they don’t have time to watch other teams outside of film review.

AP poll shouldn’t exist period.
And some 80+ year old who won the Heisman 60 years ago does?

I do think that media members in general probably have the best overall overview of the sport out of the relevant groups (players, coaches, journalists). Now the question which members you give a vote to is certainly debateable. I also think there's a place for the AP and Coaches poll, but I don't think they should be released until Week 6 or 7 (roughly the halfway point of the season) as the current system reinforces the point I keep making about the big name programs getting the benefit of the doubt. Everyone should start at zero as, especially in this day and age with the portal creating an unprecedented level of player turnover from season to season, we just don't know **** about most teams before the season and there's a heavy bias towards teams that were successful the previous season and it takes a while for things to reset and regress to the mean both for teams doing better than expected but also for teams doing worse than anticipated. I realise that the ultimately relevant ranking is the one by the CFP committee, but the AP poll helps shape perception and the narrative. But then I also realise that the US sports media has a fetish with rankings (probably also because it's a cheap and easy way to create engagement with your content, especially if you throw some rage bait).
 
Back
Top