LAte to this, but are they sure that Sims meant the University of Miami and not Miami University?
It’s a troll account.LAte to this, but are they sure that Sims meant the University of Miami and not Miami University?
A lot of fake on3 accounts floating around on twitter.LAte to this, but are they sure that Sims meant the University of Miami and not Miami University?
What is Nebraska doing with the rest of us recruiting elites?
What is Nebraska doing with the rest of us recruiting elites?
Guess his brother starts there.What is Nebraska doing with the rest of us recruiting elites?
Shows you how little these services know. Wilty, Beebe, Young and Bailey turned out to be more 75s than 85s.Will be interesting to look at how the services rate the guys we get this season compared to last season. Washington was the only guy last year to have higher than an 86 rating as a transfer.
2023...
David Connor...83
Kareem Harden...85
Isaiah Jatta...88
Jeremiah McCrimmon...NR
Jack Bailey...85
Savion Washington...88
Jack Wilty...86
Hank Zilinskas...83
Reggie Young...85
Tyler Brown...86
Landon Bebee...85
2024...
Kahlil Benson...87
Tyler Johnson...figuring an 88-90
Yakiri Walker...NR yet
Justin Mayers...88
Issiah Walker...89
Amari Ward...NR yet
Be interesting to track, but it's clear we're landing higher regarded players along the line this year.
Trolling?What is Nebraska doing with the rest of us recruiting elites?
Do we have a shot at this guy? He would basically solve our DL issues by himself.
I actually thought Wilty played better than Bebee and Bailey when given the chance.Shows you how little these services know. Wilty, Beebe, Young and Bailey turned out to be more 75s than 85s.
Yeah. I had a conversation with a Prime hater the other day about how transfers aren't rated the same as high school kids.
Obviously basketball is different, but we can draw some parallels.
A 5* is probably a 1-and-done in hoops, so no difference in how long you will have the guy vs a Top 15 transfer. But you get more production (and likely fewer mistakes, better leadership & more professionalism with practice/ film/ other habits) than you'd get from a true frosh. Does more to win now than the 5* prep. Better use of your NIL resources.
Taking this to football, I think you get all the same advantages with the only difference being that you get a football recruit for 3 years before he can go to the NFL. But, realistically, the portal has changed that math. If he's unproductive, you paid for nothing while investing in developing him for no return (he either never produces or is dissatisfied with his PT and transfers for a new opportunity). If he gives you a productive year, then you got that season but now have to re-recruit and pay him like you would a transfer so that he doesn't get poached.
It's definitely the portal era. Transfers are a better investment when comparing apples-to-apples of a prep vs transfer on the same tier in their respective groups. Better off taking the production from a transfer and then snagging those preps you liked from the portal after they've gotten development and proven themselves somewhere else.
If I was coaching college football, I might only sign a handful of preps a year.
It’s impressive you could see differences between individual OL standing up and looking back toward the QB as soon as the ball was snapped. Perhaps, he was faster getting out of his stance to turn around? Or maybe he used the momentum of the DL flying past to help him spin around quicker. (j/k)I actually thought Wilty played better than Bebee and Bailey when given the chance.
I actually thought Wilty played better than Bebee and Bailey when given the chance.
Give me Cody and I’m good.
Obviously basketball is different, but we can draw some parallels.
A 5* is probably a 1-and-done in hoops, so no difference in how long you will have the guy vs a Top 15 transfer. But you get more production (and likely fewer mistakes, better leadership & more professionalism with practice/ film/ other habits) than you'd get from a true frosh. Does more to win now than the 5* prep. Better use of your NIL resources.
Taking this to football, I think you get all the same advantages with the only difference being that you get a football recruit for 3 years before he can go to the NFL. But, realistically, the portal has changed that math. If he's unproductive, you paid for nothing while investing in developing him for no return (he either never produces or is dissatisfied with his PT and transfers for a new opportunity). If he gives you a productive year, then you got that season but now have to re-recruit and pay him like you would a transfer so that he doesn't get poached.
It's definitely the portal era. Transfers are a better investment when comparing apples-to-apples of a prep vs transfer on the same tier in their respective groups. Better off taking the production from a transfer and then snagging those preps you liked from the portal after they've gotten development and proven themselves somewhere else.
If I was coaching college football, I might only sign a handful of preps a year.
Come for the opportunity to showcase your skills to other teams. Stay for the Flatirons!Perfect reason why Bryce Underwood should come to CU.
Really feels like CU is in a unique position this recruiting cycle and next where an elite QB can really benefit from coming here AND they would probably stay their whole career and play for Prime.Come for the opportunity to showcase your skills to other teams. Stay for the Flatirons!
Perfect reason why Bryce Underwood should come to CU.
Programs like us or Nebraska need to continue to recruit guys like this in hopes of becoming one of those schools that top guys want to transfer to.Definitely feel like Lanning doing Ty Thompson the way he did should make some future high school QBs rethink Oregon, and of course you can expand that to most big time programs.
What the Nubs should worry about is Raiola being successful for a year or two and then leaving to be the type of guy the big time programs are bringing in.
Their only hope is boosters stepping up... Apparently that's happening as rumors are they've got around $15 million for NIL this off season.I honestly don't see Nebraska ever being that place again. They're hopelessly buried in the new Big Ten.
We have a better chance in the Big 12 and a evidence by going and getting Prime, we're obviously less adverse to swinging for the fences. And as you already said, as long as we have Prime, we're that place already.
@Uncle Ken you gonna put up with this appropriation?
That’s a huge bag and I think the thought leaders have realized, they have to buy a place at the elite table. The ceiling for just building it is lower than elite. They need to buy a handful of free agents that are the difference makers just like the NFL. And they need to way outspend programs that have other things to attract players such as recent success, or CP.Their only hope is boosters stepping up... Apparently that's happening as rumors are they've got around $15 million for NIL this off season.