Theyāre on Spring Break right now
Theyāre on Spring Break right now
Not for everybody.What's wrong with dark theme? Wouldn't it be easier to read that way?
View attachment 83711
And like Yakky said, they are on spring break. That's why the political board is active.![]()
Thatās when we were really good. So Iām on board.I just read we are switching Folsom to artificial turf this season? WTF?
jus like the dum truck, lol.the ncaa just needs to go away voluntarily before it gets pushed out of the way. id just go ahead with it and tell the ncaa "try me".
Seems unfair that other programs are locked in their old ways and we arenāt? Not fair that they arenāt able to innovate and we are? Not fair that they have Matt Rhule and we have Prime?I actually get the rationale for it... as other teams have locked in their own stuff and it could cause an unfair disadvantage, i expect them to approve this over the summer.
Agreed. Other top programs are cancelling their spring games and Prime is trying to showcase his, but Itās just an easy justification for the NCAA to make to say noSeems unfair that other programs are locked in their old ways and we arenāt? Not fair that they arenāt able to innovate and we are? Not fair that they have Matt Rhule and we have Prime?
Or is it more unfair that we can innovate and they wonāt let us?
Your argument seems fit for losers.
Fun detected and rejected
I said something similar to Nikita yesterday. NCAA stopped something that would promote the sport while doing no harm to student athletes because of the politics of it being on short notice and those who came up with the idea benefiting this year while others wouldn't be able to adapt quickly enough. I would bet that if it had been a tOSU/UT spring game idea instead of CU/Cuse, it would have been approved.Seems unfair that other programs are locked in their old ways and we arenāt? Not fair that they arenāt able to innovate and we are? Not fair that they have Matt Rhule and we have Prime?
Or is it more unfair that we can innovate and they wonāt let us?
Your argument seems fit for losers.
dont get me wrong, I disagree with them not allowing it, but i at least understand the timing part of the rationale.Seems unfair that other programs are locked in their old ways and we arenāt? Not fair that they arenāt able to innovate and we are? Not fair that they have Matt Rhule and we have Prime?
Or is it more unfair that we can innovate and they wonāt let us?
Your argument seems fit for losers.