Bielema just ****ing with Beamer, pretty hilarious.
Then Bielema did all that last second substitution to get him to burn a timeout.And Beamer just told him to **** off
Then a Cocky TD and a FU from Beamer.Then Bielema did all that last second substitution to get him to burn a timeout.
Then Bielema did all that last second substitution to get him to burn a timeout.
Handshake could be good.And then Bielema taunted the South Carolina sideline. He's an ass
Maybe, but my in-laws went to Illinois and I have a soft spot. Plus I want the SEC to lose every game they play.And then Bielema taunted the South Carolina sideline. He's an ass
Maybe, but my in-laws went to Illinois and I have a soft spot. Plus I want the SEC to lose every game they play.
Can’t wait for the post game handshake at the Citrus
You'll never guess who the referee was for the Citrus Bowl.
And somehow, they're usually ranked higher than the teams they lose to. I'm not sure what it means.SEC! SEC! SEC!
And somehow, they're usually ranked higher than the teams they lose to. I'm not sure what it means.
Why do you think the southeastern part of the country sucks so much at football, and what are your opinions on the ACC bowl record?I'm disappointed that South Carolina lost but that was a fun and entertaining football game
It means that SEC teams preseason rankings are inflated. Teams being ranked that shouldn't be. Preseason rankings are a problem, especially with the transfer portal being the way it is.And somehow, they're usually ranked higher than the teams they lose to. I'm not sure what it means.
Agree. I think Oct 15 should be first ratings.It means that SEC teams preseason rankings are inflated. Teams being ranked that shouldn't be. Preseason rankings are a problem, especially with the transfer portal being the way it is.
But even then, the rankings will be inflated because it will be SEC and ACC teams playing each other. It's obvious that northern teams (except for one really good SEC team each year) take their football more seriously. Rankings should be weighted toward northern teams.Agree. I think Oct 15 should be first ratings.
But even then, the rankings will be inflated because it will be SEC and ACC teams playing each other. It's obvious that northern teams (except for one really good SEC team each year) take their football more seriously. Rankings should be weighted toward northern teams.
Oh settle down you ****ing systems-dork, I'm just ****ing with Carolina.Did you say weighted?
I’m all for weighting rankings by SOS, SOR, GC and other advanced metrics. Honestly, just give me Vegas Power Rankings. They are getting better at figuring out portal impact, but i’d still wait until 5-6 games into the season.
Why do you think the southeastern part of the country sucks so much at football, and what are your opinions on the ACC bowl record?
Do you miss the PAC yet?
But your idea was good.Oh settle down you ****ing systems-dork, I'm just ****ing with Carolina.
I qualified it by acknowledging that are one or two great SEC teams that feast on their weak conference-mates each year.Damm, this part of the country sucks at football *
* - 16 of the last 18 national champions have come from the Southeastern part of the country
And yes the ACC sucks at football and their bowl record is comical, no doubt there. But at least they're a premier conference in basketball! Oh wait....