What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Bowl Games (other than ours) and associated silliness 2024 Plus the Playoffs

Can you explain it to me?if you go for it,to win you have to:
- make the 4th down
- score a TD
- make the 2 pt conversion
- stop OSU
- score another TD
- convert another 2 pt conversion
- stop OSU again
- win in overtime

If you kick, you have to score twice, but no 2pt conversions, no OT, and the rest is basically the same. I think the math works out.
 
Tommy Dewey Waiting GIF by NOW WE'RE TALKING TV SERIES
 
Ohio State went through a tough slate to win the Championship so there should be no controversy.

Overall I think College Football has to do some fine tuning on the playoff system. I am not sure that you want to keep the conference championship games - none of the conference champions got out of the second round. Trying to protect the conference champions ended up with a ridiculous seeding scenario. Do it more like College BB and seed on merit. Neither ASU and Boise deserved a bye, IMO. Just because you win a conference should not give you a #1 seed.
 
Ohio State went through a tough slate to win the Championship so there should be no controversy.

Overall I think College Football has to do some fine tuning on the playoff system. I am not sure that you want to keep the conference championship games - none of the conference champions got out of the second round. Trying to protect the conference champions ended up with a ridiculous seeding scenario. Do it more like College BB and seed on merit. Neither ASU and Boise deserved a bye, IMO. Just because you win a conference should not give you a #1 seed.
Give conference champions spots, but don't hand them byes.

I don't have an issue with ASU getting a bye, but Boise had no business getting that bye. We'd have been better off sending tOSU or ND to the Fiesta Bowl and letting Indiana or Tennessee host Boise.

Another thing with bowl season....we can play bowls like whatever the **** the game the John Denver fan club (aka West Virginia) played in was called to Sundays.
 
Last edited:
My kid and I were watching last night and he was talking about who he was rooting for (literally changed twice) and asked who I was rooting for. I told him that with just a couple of exceptions, if either of these teams were playing anyone else, I would be rooting for the other team instead of OSU or ND.

He was like, "So CU?"
"Of course."
"And CSU?"
"Well..."
"Oh, but Arizona or Arizona State?"
"Well...."

That's when I realized I am a petty, petty, petty college football fan.
 
Last edited:
Move Army/Navy to the week before current week 0. Make it the only game that day, big spectacle. Start of college football.

That gives back 1 week.
No.

Integrate the conference championship games into the playoff and done.
 
Do both. Zero reason for Army/Navy to be its own week at the end of the season.

Plenty of reasons for the schools who actually play the game (and schedule it) to play it when they do. Sorry it doesn't fit anyone else's agenda.

The service academies think of football much more differently than any other school does. It's about teaching lessons to both the players, and also the other students, that they are expected to utilize throughout their careers as military officers.

It's not about advertising, alumni relationships, fund raising, media revenue, exposure, or any of the other things that you and I normally think of that are true for civilian universities.

It's about using football as a team sport to train military leaders, and that mission is not accomplished by a week zero game.
 
Plenty of reasons for the schools who actually play the game (and schedule it) to play it when they do. Sorry it doesn't fit anyone else's agenda.

The service academies think of football much more differently than any other school does. It's about teaching lessons to both the players, and also the other students, that they are expected to utilize throughout their careers as military officers.

It's not about advertising, alumni relationships, fund raising, media revenue, exposure, or any of the other things that you and I normally think of that are true for civilian universities.

It's about using football as a team sport to train military leaders, and that mission is not accomplished by a week zero game.
I'm not seeing the connection from the last three paragraphs to the plenty of reasons that the game should be played the week after the CCGs.
 
Back
Top