Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Absolutely wrong.Shoulda stuck around another year.
Absolutely wrong.Shoulda stuck around another year.
NFL teams look at him as one of the possible top 10 Lbs in the draft.That's a pretty damn good time, he probably be a role guy, but who gives a **** if you can make the league? Talking about DT, btw.
He could be, I'm not really doubting his abilities. More, what system he'll fit. Hopefully, some squad will pick him to showcase what he can do well.NFL teams look at him as one of the possible top 10 Lbs in the draft.
Shoulda stuck around another year.
He is integral to Chev’s offense.Why?
My favorite DT moment last year was against Nowledge. Hopefully this link will start around 25:50. First, Mang flashes his potential as a play maker. Buffs! finally get on the board and then DT makes a statement tackle with his speed on the ensuing Nobbler first down. Still makes me happy, even with the disappointment over the end of the season and getting shanked by midnight.
My favorite DT moment last year was against Nowledge. Hopefully this link will start around 25:50. First, Mang flashes his potential as a play maker. Buffs! finally get on the board and then DT makes a statement tackle with his speed on the ensuing Nobbler first down. Still makes me happy, even with the disappointment over the end of the season and getting shanked by midnight.
Viska’s injuries were probably due to being a work horse for us. If Montez is faster than Viska, why were we running the wildcat so much with Viska? I know he is more athletic, but Montez is pretty tough too.
Viska’s injuries were probably due to being a work horse for us. If Montez is faster than Viska, why were we running the wildcat so much with Viska? I know he is more athletic, but Montez is pretty tough too.
You’re right, he sure don’t.Does Montez truck that Stanford defender?
Viska’s injuries were probably due to being a work horse for us. If Montez is faster than Viska, why were we running the wildcat so much with Viska? I know he is more athletic, but Montez is pretty tough too.
Well he was frustrating for us, sure, but I am optimistic he could be successful at the next level. Same concerns as you, sure, but his time at CU is over and he is part of CU’s legacy now and his success is our success.I take your point, but he was the starter for three years, and for three years we were 5-7 and were one game away from a bowl. And for three years Montez would make the same easily avoidable mistakes, again and again and again, and they would cost us at least a couple wins a year. And every year, he would say the right things, a new guru would come in, he would look great in practice, and then make the same mistakes all over again in actual games. He is, easily, the most frustrating qb to play for CU in my memory.
Im not rooting for him to fail, and I dont think anybody else here is either. But hearing people nationally talk about montez looking great in practice, and how his mechanics are getting fixed, etc. is like being poked at with a lit cigarette. He is not moldable, coachable or fixable.
No, he would've slid before he got to him.Does Montez truck that Stanford defender?
I don’t think Mangham’s ball skills kept him off the field. Probably came down to pass protection or some nuance in decision making. He was a freshman and it can be fixed.The back to back plays by Mangham is exactly why I believe he was better than Fontnot last year and will prove to be a very good player.