A lot of revisionist history and there’s no way to make a counterfactual argument about how it would have turned out if he were still in the game, but let’s just say I’m glad he wasn’t.
It's not revisionist history to point out that AM had 25 yards rushing in the second when we're talking about the defensive adjustments to AM running the ball.
Of course there's no way of knowing what would have happened if AM hadn't gotten hurt, but it is fair to point out that he would have been facing 1st and 20, the same as Bunch did. It's also fair to point out that Bunch played extremely well in relief of AM.
Husker fans are pushing the narrative that AM getting hurt was the difference in the game, but the statistical analysis and momentum in the second half makes that a murky argument at best.