Who is he with now?Not the first time I’ve seen him be openly petty towards CU/CUAD which is odd for someone whose job is to “cover” the program.
Who is he with now?Not the first time I’ve seen him be openly petty towards CU/CUAD which is odd for someone whose job is to “cover” the program.
AltitudeWho is he with now?
He's not helping Adam anymore?Altitude
Oh sorry I thought you meant Vic. Yeah I think he’s doing stuff with Adam but also Mike High SportsHe's not helping Adam anymore?
They did buy access early on and earned the trust of the media team.Is
Is Chase really calling out DNVR?
Hmmm not sure how I feel about that, tbhThey did buy access early on and earned the trust of the media team.
It’s called the big leaguesHmmm not sure how I feel about that, tbh
Sure, but it might take those guys doing something they think is beneath them....showing up at fall camp media stuff.Meh. Denver media has never had anything like Prime. They don't understand a superstar personality like him. They can't fathom someone saying no to them.
Vic is a good dude and one of the only ones who loves everything Colorado.
Who'd they buy it from?They did buy access early on and earned the trust of the media team.
I’m wondering if “buy” is more a euphemism for “gushingly positive in all situations” as I don’t feel like DNVR is rolling in dough.Who'd they buy it from?
Funny hearing McChesney talk about culture. He might want to fix what is wrong in his own world first.Maybe there is more context to it but the culture thing bothers me the most.The other stuff, he is being deliberately obtuse to cater to his audience
CSU fans want desperately to be "big time" but know in their hearts that if CU is 1-11 and CSU is 11-1 that CU is still closer to a national championship than they are.CSU fans would rather see their own team suck and their AD financially crash if it meant that CU was also a laughingstock vs having to live in a world where CU was a media darling that regularly made the CFB Playoffs.
My impression of them over the years is that they spend much more energy cheering against CU than they do cheering for CSU.
A legit gripe CSU fans have is that they are as big of a school with equivalent recruiting grounds in a better market with better academics than the likes of KSU, ISU and others which are "Power" conference members for decades but they're left out. They're really a cut above most of the MWC and AAC schools.CSU fans want desperately to be "big time" but know in their hearts that if CU is 1-11 and CSU is 11-1 that CU is still closer to a national championship than they are.
A program that has trouble getting one sellout per year in a shiny new 35,000 seat on campus stadium, that late in the season has trouble getting 10,000 people to actually show up for a game, that pins it's hopes on players who were passed over or rejected by power conference teams, that even the recruits don't actually know where they are, etc. isn't big time.
CU has had the worst 20 year stretch in it's history and still dominates the Rams on and off the field.
We are simply talking about two completely different levels of college football and the CSU fans (especially that little core of serious fans who actually know and care what is going on) hate that reality.
Except that their fans and alums aren't willing to put up the resources that plenty of schools that are not their peers do.A legit gripe CSU fans have is that they are as big of a school with equivalent recruiting grounds in a better market with better academics than the likes of KSU, ISU and others which are "Power" conference members for decades but they're left out. They're really a cut above most of the MWC and AAC schools.
So, yes, they are justifiably frustrated. Case in point, now that OSU & WSU have been relegated it's more likely that CSU gets the call than either of them. Historical decisions have more to do with their situation than anything actually related to CSU today when compared to peers.Except that their fans and alums aren't willing to put up the resources that plenty of schools that are not their peers do.
They can complain about CU but even at the worst CU was selling more tickets than the CSU stadium has seats, CU supporters contribute the funds needed to run a power conference football program. CU produces TV ratings that make them valuable to broadcasters.
We can make the same complaints about the schools that are in the Big Money 2 conferences. How many SEC schools are better academically than CU, have bigger TV markets, etc. They are in the position they are in because their fans show up and pay up more than we do.
This is college football. Stanford and Cal are in great recruiting ground and have top of the line academics. Why didn't the B1G take them. It's all about how much money they would make for the other schools.
Nobody in the college football world care how elite your Vet School is or your Environmental Science and Natural Resources programs. They care about how much interest you generate for advertisers.
My biggest gripe is the bottom tier programs in the P2 that are where they are because they are easy wins for the top programs in their leagues, period.Except that their fans and alums aren't willing to put up the resources that plenty of schools that are not their peers do.
They can complain about CU but even at the worst CU was selling more tickets than the CSU stadium has seats, CU supporters contribute the funds needed to run a power conference football program. CU produces TV ratings that make them valuable to broadcasters.
We can make the same complaints about the schools that are in the Big Money 2 conferences. How many SEC schools are better academically than CU, have bigger TV markets, etc. They are in the position they are in because their fans show up and pay up more than we do.
This is college football. Stanford and Cal are in great recruiting ground and have top of the line academics. Why didn't the B1G take them. It's all about how much money they would make for the other schools.
Nobody in the college football world care how elite your Vet School is or your Environmental Science and Natural Resources programs. They care about how much interest you generate for advertisers.
There are some programs in the SEC/B1G that are only there because they historically have been part of those conferences but at that they still generate revenues and ratings that would put them solidly in the middle of the B12/ACC.So, yes, they are justifiably frustrated. Case in point, now that OSU & WSU have been relegated it's more likely that CSU gets the call than either of them. Historical decisions have more to do with their situation than anything actually related to CSU today when compared to peers.
which power conference ISU do you believe has inferior academics to CSU?A legit gripe CSU fans have is that they are as big of a school with equivalent recruiting grounds in a better market with better academics than the likes of KSU, ISU and others which are "Power" conference members for decades but they're left out. They're really a cut above most of the MWC and AAC schools.
I’m wondering if “buy” is more a euphemism for “gushingly positive in all situations” as I don’t feel like DNVR is rolling in dough.
BUT Brad would certainly be dialed in more than my speculation.
Oregon, FSU, TT, ASU, Cincy, Louisville, Alabama, Okie St, KSU, WVU, Houston, & Miss St.which power conference ISU do you believe has inferior academics to CSU?
I had no idea any of those schools used 'ISU' as an abbreviationOregon, FSU, TT, ASU, Cincy, Louisville, Alabama, Okie St, KSU, WVU, Houston, & Miss St.
CSU is a more highly rated research university than Iowa State. ARWU.which power conference ISU do you believe has inferior academics to CSU?