Ahoel went to Greeley.Put a quarter in your a** because you played yourself internet troll.
Starting to think most people have hit the ignore button on your nonsense.
And no, the dumbest mistake Colorado ever made was accepting you ya freakin loser into the school.
hope you have better luck than me at thisCan y’all keep the smooth brain 5 IQ political takes over in the proper threads?
I’m here to read anxiety induced 1 IQ pontification about CU’s journey to the SEC.
ty
No problem - as long as you all recognize the trend in the non-pol forums.Can y’all keep the smooth brain 5 IQ political takes over in the proper threads?
I’m here to read anxiety induced 1 IQ pontification about CU’s journey to the SEC.
ty
California’s economic strength is relevant to this discussion.Can y’all keep the smooth brain 5 IQ political takes over in the proper threads?
I’m here to read anxiety induced 1 IQ pontification about CU’s journey to the SEC.
ty
I’m not a “rightie”. This is my request for everyone regardless of where they are on the pol spectrum. I think it’s a reasonable request since there’s a place for that discussionNo problem - as long as you all recognize the trend in the non-pol forums.
1. A righty makes a ridiculous unsubstantiated political claim
2. A lefty rebuts that claim
3. Then all you ****ing snowflake righties cry and and say take it to the political board.
That’s weird. The report is dated 18-Nov 2020. Wonder what was going on then…A one year, one time windfall does not equate to a healthy state economy. Remember, just the facts.The 2021-22 Budget: California's Fiscal Outlook
The annual Fiscal Outlook publication gives our office’s independent assessment of the California state budget condition for the upcoming fiscal year and over the longer term. We find the budget situation has improved considerably relative to the June budget act with an estimated $26 billion...lao.ca.gov
That is from 2020. Here is an article from a couple of weeks ago. Your one-year $26 billion windfall somehow turned into $100 billion.A one year, one time windfall does not equate to a healthy state economy. Remember, just the facts.The 2021-22 Budget: California's Fiscal Outlook
The annual Fiscal Outlook publication gives our office’s independent assessment of the California state budget condition for the upcoming fiscal year and over the longer term. We find the budget situation has improved considerably relative to the June budget act with an estimated $26 billion...lao.ca.gov
Yes I did. Grades weren't good enough for CU in high school and I had no interest in a 5 year sentence in Fort Collins.....so Stinkville it was. Vic is still a dumbass though.Ahoel went to Greeley.
I want BYU in the conference just for the Mormon jokes.Is our powerhouse program in the SEC yet?
I want BYU in the conference with us so everyone here can learn about “soaking”. ****ing weird. Research and your own risk and not on your work computer.
Their surplus is because of how the stock market did. Guess what next year will look like?That is from 2020. Here is an article from a couple of weeks ago. Your one-year $26 billion windfall somehow turned into $100 billion.
How big is California's historic budget, visualized
Where does the historic California budget rank compared to previous budgets, and just how big is $300 billion?calmatters.org
CA has one of the strongest economies in the world. That was my only point when I chimed in.It must be that $7 gasoline makes California so much smarter than the rest of the country.
So, not a one year windfall then as you claimed? I swear some people will twist themselves in knots to avoid ever admitting they were wrong.Their surplus is because of how the stock market did. Guess what next year will look like?
So, not a one year windfall then as you claimed? I swear some people will twist themselves in knots to avoid ever admitting they were wrong.
1. Bogus claim
2. Fact-based rebuttal
3. Redirect with unrelated bogus claim
4. Fact-based rebuttal to unrelated bogus claim
5. But income inequality!!!
I think I've settled on the Big 12 as the move I'd like for CU, and I honestly don't even care if any of the Pac10 programs follow (in fact, outside of Oregon and Washington, it's probably better that none do). The money is almost assuredly going to be better than any of the other options that involve staying in the Pac 10, and the week to week inventory is so much better than what the Pac 10 has to offer.I’m not sure if this is correct, but seems to me that CU has four choices:
1. Stay in PAC 10, no expansion, collect $30-$35 million per school
2. Stay in PAC 10, add a couple Mtn West schools, get $30 million per school
3. PAC 10 poach the best of the Big 12 (if you can),get $40 million per school
4. Leave for Big 12, with either group of 4 or 6 teams, get $45 million per school
Again, those appear to be the figures bandied about. Correct me if I’m way off.
Scenarios 1 and 2 give CU least amount or revenue, potentially the least stability with some teams always eyeing an exit. Have the most acedemic prestige.
Scenario 3 provides more money, provide greater conference stability, maintains decent academic prestige
Scenario 4 offers most money, provides greater conference stability, most TV markets from coast to coast, conference has greater enthusiasm for football, but academic prestige takes significant hit.
Any way you slice it, CU is not monetarily competitive with either SEC or Big Ten (aka the Biggie Tupac), so all the fretting one way or another really doesn’t matter. I mean, being $50 million behind or $55 million, who cares?
If you’re a football fan, heading to the Big 12 is probably the right call. If academics, west coast ties is your thing, probably just stand pat.
EDIT...seems like heading to the Big 12 is the way to go if below is accurate.
View attachment 52756
Cause you're lonely.Why do I keep clicking on this thread?
Cause you're lonely.
It must be that $7 gasoline makes California so much smarter than the rest of the country.
Where I'd say $45M, dumbass? I think they're worth more than the Pac 10 is right now for sure-but that's because I think the Pac 10 is likely getting a media deal in the low to mid $20m per school range. Your idea is never going to work, and here's why: The Pac 10 and Big 12 were talking about it. The Big 12 wanted to bring their entire conference. The Pac 10 said they didn't want BYU/UCF. The Big 12 told the Pac 10 the deal was off. You know why they could do that? Because they ****ing have leverage. Same thing you don't understand about this ****. That's why Big 12 fans mock you on twitter, dumb****. Your takes make me think this conference has leverage because its brand is better or (insert some other stupid ****ing justification that makes no sense). BYU over Cal? How far up your ass is your head? Nobody in San Francisco watches college football.
Joining the Pac 12 was the dumbest decision this university ever made.
Behind a paywall, but on the surface this seems to be a great idea, IMO