What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

Sure, highlights of everything are available eventually but the average sports fan isn't going to go out there and search for highlights of every game played that day. SC brought it to you, which is why it was such a great show. An example of a good highlights show still around is College Football Final. They show highlights of most P5 and relevant games that were played and a few coaches interviews from the biggest games, and they never spend an extraordinary amount of time on 1 game.

Just pointing out there are a lot more options for the average sports fan that ESPN now has to compete with. I agree that there is a market for the highlight shows.
 
The value of ESPN in a post-internet video world is in live sports. It is no longer feasible to draw in the needed viewership numbers by focusing on highlights and straightforward news reporting like it was even a decade ago. Personalities drive engagement and that is what ESPN taps be it in their hosts or the topics they cover.
Although I believe that a well-produced highlight show will still draw viewers, I also understand ESPN's attempt to drive engagement through personalities. ESPN's problem has been in its selection of personalities, the vast majority of which have no insight or talent, and several of which are downright off-putting to typical sports fans.
 
I think the main problem for ESPN is that its business model was built on maximizing revenue through cable & satellite carriage fees. Now they have too much overhead with all these channels. It's changing fast to where they really need is ESPN and ESPN2 plus streaming of all the live sporting events for which they have rights but not enough channels to broadcast them. They're set up to manage to the peaks, which leaves them with hours of filler no one cares about. (Similar to the issue of PACN having 6 regional networks on top of the main.)
 
Please please please let the Amazon thing happen. And then please please please make Altitude less of a PITA to get.
Yeah. It’d be nice if games were available on Amazon and I could tell Dish to get lost, go back to DirecTV and be able to watch the Nuggets, Avs and Rox.
 
Would, then, Amazon carry all of the Pac 12 content including men’s and women’s basketball, soccer, etc?

Oh, and if it happens before those two traitors leave, they get NOTHING!!
 
Wilner's mailbag a couple days ago with some insight on likely timing of media rights and expansion announcements:


Do you anticipate expansion news in January? — @lilcmac5

Based on a recent conversation with one of the Hotline’s most-trusted industry sources, I would peg mid-January to mid-February as the likeliest window for a media rights deal.

And given that Kliavkoff has stated the expansion piece would come after the media rights contract and subsequent grant-of-rights agreement, it could be March or April before the Pac-12 resolves the expansion issue.
 
Warren wants further expansion but not getting support from Ohio St.
Wonder if he feels like his job is now at a dead end.
 
A change in B1G leadership means that there will be someone new with their own vision wanting to put their stamp on things. Basically, any previous statements made about conference plans are nullified.
This.

A revitalized CU was always a great strategic fit with the B1G. A downtrodden CU, not so much.

Not only does a revitalized CU add value to the conference in its own right, it's the rare commodity that actually makes some of your current assets more valuable. NU is a much more valuable school with CU in the conference than it is outside the conference.

If there's a conference that understands both the value of and how to market and hype rivalries, it's the B1G.
 
Is being President of the Chicago Bears really a better job than BIG Commissioner?
At this point in time, probably. Warren did everything he needed to do for the B1G at the moment, securing the largest CFB media contract in history, and stole the LA market. Next big thing would be further expansion and renegotiating the next deal in 5-6 years, so nothing new.

If he has his sites set on NFL commissioner, getting back into the league is the next step, IMO
 
Back
Top