That is one possibility. It is also possible they Join the Big12. It appears SDSU also asked for a one month extension from the MWC to give their final notice. I think SDSU wants to join a P5 conference. The P12 will announce a deal within 30 minutes of getting it because everyone is out of patience.Deal seems to be done. SDSU gave notice. They gone.
I read it’s just SDSU and SMU. There’s no No. 3 option. That means we’re not leaving. P12 needs 12 schools for inventory. Math it out and it means we’re staying… because there’s a deal.
Maybe.
CU apparently is waiting to see what crap deal the PAC presents its schools. They know the Big12 is there waiting.
Not true. We just want to give the Pac10 every chance to come back with their ****ty media deal then we'll bolt for the Big 12.
Nah. A university like SDSU doesn’t tell a conference they intend to leave w/o knowing exactly where they’re going.That is one possibility. It is also possible they Join the Big12. It appears SDSU also asked for a one month extension from the MWC to give their final notice. I think SDSU wants to join a P5 conference. The P12 will announce a deal within 30 minutes of getting it because everyone is out of patience.
Nah. A university like SDSU doesn’t tell a conference they intend to leave w/o knowing exactly where they’re going.
The PAC is already dead. Could be soon, could be 5 or 6 years.those rooting for the demise of the pac, i offer this:
The PAC is already dead. Could be soon, could be 5 or 6 years.
The little 12 could win 5 straight national championships and CU would still be the most prestigious school if they were to join. They are the big fish. No need to do anything until it is time.At which point we have like no leverage to avoid their 99 year contract.
That’s my reaction to USC and UCLA…..those rooting for the demise of the pac, i offer this:
Pure conjecture on your part.Yep, and in 5 or 6 years it is a stepping stone to the Big10. A move to the B12 now is the end of any shot at the Big10.
Why would they ask the MW for an extension if they’re going to the B12?Yes. And you have no idea if they will be going to the Pac12 or the Big12.
Why would they ask the MW for an extension if they’re going to the B12?
The logical answer is they wouldn’t. If we believe they know where they’re going, and I do, then there’s no reason to ask for an extension w/ the B12. We can assume they checked on the extension so the P12 can have more time for T&Cs. It was denied (obviously bc the ask was stupid) and if anything it put more heat on the P12 to wrap up it up well before 6/30. The deal is donezo people. We’re adding SDSU and SMU. All that’s left is the final bow and the press releases.
As much as I wish CU eventually ends up in the BIG10, I just don't see it happening. So many more schools ahead of them unfortunately.Yep, and in 5 or 6 years it is a stepping stone to the Big10. A move to the B12 now is the end of any shot at the Big10.
More likely hes dropping actual details on the presidents/decision makers that are good enough to keep them interested in NOT leaving. Since he actually works for them he has a duty to report out reality. And if the reality were zero on the deal schools would already have left. Probably there is a pretty good deal on the table thats waiting for one last hangup or vendor to close and then this is done. Maybe, for example, they cant quite agree on what to do or what to value/pay for with the P12Nets. Maybe the comcast clawback is an issue.it seems like Kliavkoff is just stringing along all the schools
The PAC is already dead. Could be soon, could be 5 or 6 years.
We may not have a choice. If the Pac can't deliver a media deal that keeps us competitive with at the minimum-we need to go. If we go, Arizona likely follows. Yormark may have enough wind at his sails to call Oregon and Washington on not having a Big 10 invite......while ASU and Utah likely have to join at that point. One likely becomes 6.Yep, and in 5 or 6 years it is a stepping stone to the Big10. A move to the B12 now is the end of any shot at the Big10.
Let’s say everything you stated is accurate. That the B12 doesn’t add SDSU until they figure out which P5 schools they’re adding. And in one of the scenarios they’re not even taking SDSU.How did you reach that conclusion? The Big 12 would not add SDSU until they find out if and who of the P5 schools are going to sign up - if just CU then SDSU makes sense. If CU, AZ, ASU and Utah all bolt to the B12 there is not room for SDSU. I see no evidence a deal is done. If it was we would know.
The PAC 12 is the only conference that take math seriously. This checks out.Deal seems to be done. SDSU gave notice. They gone.
I read it’s just SDSU and SMU. There’s no No. 3 option. That means we’re not leaving. P12 needs 12 schools for inventory. Math it out and it means we’re staying… because there’s a deal.
Maybe.
We cannot limp along on financial scraps for 5 years. There’s no way we do that. No way we can afford that. There could be a $20mil+ a year difference between what the PAC-00 comes up with and B12/B16.Yep, and in 5 or 6 years it is a stepping stone to the Big10. A move to the B12 now is the end of any shot at the Big10.
Here's my read on them-They're the most attractive G5 left. The Pac wants them, and the Big 12 does too. They want into a power league. They'd rather the Pac survive and join that, but they're willing to take a Big 12 invite to get into a power league. Travel's not that bad-BYU's not far for them, and they're likely thinking they're joining the Big 12 alongside multiple Pac 12 schools if that comes to pass.Let’s say everything you stated is accurate. That the B12 doesn’t add SDSU until they figure out which P5 schools they’re adding. And in one of the scenarios they’re not even taking SDSU.
Why would SDSU resign from the MW? It wouldn’t make sense. So SDSU is waiting on the B12? And they’re willing to risk not being in any conference to find out if they’ll take them?
And right up until then, we'd managed to keep this thread conjecture free! Nice goin' Big Jim.Pure conjecture on your part.
One thing you are missing - SDSU did not resign from the MWC. They sent a letter of intent to do so and asked for a month's extension to make up their mind. That month is important because June 30th is the deadline for leaving the MWC without a big jump in exit fee. You read it one way, I read it another. If a deal was done and SDSU was going to join the PAC they would resign and it join. I think the PAC has told them they are interested but won't do anything until they have a media deal. The Big12 has told them they are interested but want to see what happens with some other teams. Everyone is hoping for more clarity soon but SDSU is running out of time so asked for an extension. I don't think anything is done.Let’s say everything you stated is accurate. That the B12 doesn’t add SDSU until they figure out which P5 schools they’re adding. And in one of the scenarios they’re not even taking SDSU.
Why would SDSU resign from the MW? It wouldn’t make sense. So SDSU is waiting on the B12? And they’re willing to risk not being in any conference to find out if they’ll take them?
The B12 has authorization to grant rights to up to 4(?) additional P5 programs, not a lower program.SDSU knows it has options in one of those conferences. It won’t be back in the MWC
It has authorization to take up to 4 additional P5 programs at full payouts. SDSU would gladly take a partial payout that would be quite a bit more than the MWCThe B12 has authorization to grant rights to up to 4(?) additional P5 programs, not a lower program.
The B12 might not be having any luck convincing its media folks to grant SDSU.
I don't see SDSU taking less from the B12 than other G5 additions got.It has authorization to take up to 4 additional P5 programs at full payouts. SDSU would gladly take a partial payout that would be quite a bit more than the MWC