TUFF AS RAIN!!
Maybe Kansas, MaybeThe current Big 12 has 100% of its memberships with far superior football products than the one Colorado offers but somehow they’re not good enough. This is comedy.
Exactly.I respectfully don't get the "stability in the big12" argument, if you rewind 12 months, they were having the same sky is falling attitude that the conference was toast. Then they added a couple G5 teams, and now all is well?
But if the Big 12 adds UO UW and the four corners schools it is at worst a washExactly.
They're facing, at the least, KU in serious discussions with the Big East along with UCF. WVU and Cincy positioning for the ACC if that conference loses members.
The Big 12 only appears stable because they are adding as many weak and vulnerable schools as possible - who are mostly resigned to the fact that their strength is literally in their numbers - to turn themselves into an unmovable blob. They suck. They’re a construct of your mind. A figment of your imagination.
Here are our options:
-Have balls of steel and parlay this into an SEC invite
-Lock Oregon and Washington into whatever media deal for a revised Pac 12 (+ others?)
-Ransom the Big 10 to add us as a lower tier school (we need incriminating docs)
-Join the Big 12 and end up on ESPN+ for the next 10 years
-Strike a deal with the ACC that doesn’t tear up their existing agreement (because many would be poached by B10 and SEC) but adds to their bottom line
-Go further west and add Beijing University and Tokyo State
Big picture they’re not. No. Pure football wise? Sure, they’re good. Texas went 3-6 last year in conference. But zoom out to a league with no headliners and soon you end up with a weak revenue stream (their media value is smoke and mirrors), no chance at nationally televised games, recruiting starts to dwindle, and half way through this affiliation you are cooked as a program with no return ticket.The current Big 12 has 100% of its memberships with far superior football products than the one Colorado offers but somehow they’re not good enough. This is comedy.
Just stop.The Big 12 only appears stable because they are adding as many weak and vulnerable schools as possible - who are mostly resigned to the fact that their strength is literally in their numbers - to turn themselves into an unmovable blob. They suck. They’re a construct of your mind. A figment of your imagination.
Here are our options:
-Have balls of steel and parlay this into an SEC invite
-Lock Oregon and Washington into whatever media deal for a revised Pac 12 (+ others?)
-Ransom the Big 10 to add us as a lower tier school (we need incriminating docs)
-Join the Big 12 and end up on ESPN+ for the next 10 years
-Strike a deal with the ACC that doesn’t tear up their existing agreement (because many would be poached by B10 and SEC) but adds to their bottom line
-Go further west and add Beijing University and Tokyo State
You don't get it. This likely is the ONLY option for CU. I don't believe the SEC is coming to save us, and Pac 12 leadership still cannot pull its head out of its ass. There's been a lot of twitter smoke today about the Pac 12 turning down a full merger with the Big 12 because the Big 12 wasn't willing to cut BYU and UCF loose.Big picture they’re not. No. Pure football wise? Sure, they’re good. Texas went 3-6 last year in conference. But zoom out to a league with no headliners and soon you end up with a weak revenue stream (their media value is smoke and mirrors), no chance at nationally televised games, recruiting starts to dwindle, and half way through this affiliation you are cooked as a program with no return ticket.
We’ve played these teams before. Our lifetime record vs ISU, KU, etc, is amazing. There’s nothing there for us anymore. We have to figure something else out.
I just want to see this ****ing league die. It was the worst move in the history of Colorado athletics.What I’m looking for out of all of this is better media access and that involves P12N level games being on a streaming service such as ESPN+. My fingers are crossed that happens this upcoming season.
The Big 12 has the better football brand and you can have the better brands but if you don’t give football the love it should be getting (like in the P12), it doesn’t matter how much better the P12 brand is without the LA schools than the Big 12. CU will be able to compete in football in either conference but the P12 is dead compared to the Big 12.
I just want to see the P12N shut down.
If they're so good why do all the remaining Big12 schools have fewer Big12 championship appearances than us?The current Big 12 has 100% of its memberships with far superior football products than the one Colorado offers but somehow they’re not good enough. This is comedy.
We’re the bottom feeders with KU in any scenario. UH and UCF mud hole us the last 15 years.A conference with UU, ASU, UA, OU, UW, TTU, ISU, BU, TCU, and OSU has plenty of oomph while still lacking a top tier program. Add in that for the most part CU, BYU, TTU, KSU, and Cincy would be competitive week in and week out. Leave you with UCF, UH, and KU as your bottom feeders. That isn't too bad.
All requires you land UW and UO though. Think that's the only way it works.
Link?Funny thing is, on some of the SEC team boards, THEY are talking matter-of-factly about adding CU because it makes sense.
BasedI just want to see this ****ing league die. It was the worst move in the history of Colorado athletics.
Headliners come and go. There is going to be some really exciting games in the new league. Would you rather watch Cincy vs ISU or FUCLA get mudholed by Ohio StateBig picture they’re not. No. Pure football wise? Sure, they’re good. Texas went 3-6 last year in conference. But zoom out to a league with no headliners and soon you end up with a weak revenue stream (their media value is smoke and mirrors), no chance at nationally televised games, recruiting starts to dwindle, and half way through this affiliation you are cooked as a program with no return ticket.
We’ve played these teams before. Our lifetime record vs ISU, KU, etc, is amazing. There’s nothing there for us anymore. We have to figure something else out.
After we left, the big 12 didn’t have a championship game until a couple of years agoIf they're so good why do all the remaining Big12 schools have fewer Big12 championship appearances than us?
No one is actually facing KU leaving a better basketball conference for a ****tier one with drastically worse money.Exactly.
They're facing, at the least, KU in serious discussions with the Big East along with UCF. WVU and Cincy positioning for the ACC if that conference loses members.
Oh christ
Did we really "appear" in 2005?If they're so good why do all the remaining Big12 schools have fewer Big12 championship appearances than us?
After we left, the big 12 didn’t have a championship game until a couple of years agoIf they're so good why do all the remaining Big12 schools have fewer Big12 championship appearances than us?
I read that, too. MHVer, the B12 pumper.You don't get it. This likely is the ONLY option for CU. I don't believe the SEC is coming to save us, and Pac 12 leadership still cannot pull its head out of its ass. There's been a lot of twitter smoke today about the Pac 12 turning down a full merger with the Big 12 because the Big 12 wasn't willing to cut BYU and UCF loose.
He's not the only one with that story on twitter.I read that, too. MHVer, the B12 pumper.
He’s also saying the AAC 4 + B12 on its own is worth $35M per team. Media execs are saying it’s $15M per team.
If we had stayed we’d currently be in B12 without Zona schools and Utah.I just want to see this ****ing league die. It was the worst move in the history of Colorado athletics.
Objectively more viewers watch OSU-UCLA.Headliners come and go. There is going to be some really exciting games in the new league. Would you rather watch Cincy vs ISU or FUCLA get mudholed by Ohio State
Objectively more viewers watch OSU-UCLA.