What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

I'm old enough to remember when ticket prices were the same throughout the venue* and the best seats went to those who were first in line, not those who threw the most money at it. I thought that change was evil.

And, I understand all of these changes are examples of "charge what the market will bear"




*not necessarily CU, but sports and concert venues for which I had experience buying tickets pre-1990.
Okay Boomer
 
They better not get rid of the COLORADO in the south end zone. This is an identity that should never get tampered with.
I have mentioned it over and over that it should be a full size curved DIGITAL SIGN/Scoreboard which shows the COLORADO most of the time, but can then flash and become a replay board or entertainment addition. That benefits everyone, we do not need seats there. The entire South side should be the Student section from top to bottom and the band
 
CU with Prime in the group of so-so ratings teams? That is ridiculous. CU is and will continue to be a top 5 ratings team with Prime. Without? We'll see. If Prime sticks around for 5 or 6 years and we hire the right replacement, there is no reason we can't be a top 20 draw after Prime. We were during the McCartney and Neuheisel years.
Coming back to this. Nielson ratings have CU not in the top 10 this year.
https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/this-years-most-watched-cfb-teams/
 
I have mentioned it over and over that it should be a full size curved DIGITAL SIGN/Scoreboard which shows the COLORADO most of the time, but can then flash and become a replay board or entertainment addition. That benefits everyone, we do not need seats there. The entire South side should be the Student section from top to bottom and the band
We definitely need room for more ads, cause that's all they'd do with it.
 
Is the East side completely untouchable or is there a chance you just redo all 3 at the same time? I assume there's not much you can still do about the North side ...

The entire 200 level seating needs to be rebuilt and that would include the east side. Just need better flow getting in and out of the stadium with wider walkways & underways.

That is assuming the entire lower bowl is left untouched.
 
And while they are improving things. Am I the only one that thinks the 50 yard line Ralphie orientation should be flipped along with the band pre-game and halftime show. Everything is mostly directed to the West side. Home team stands on the East side, most students are East side. I believe everything should be oriented towards the East side.
 
Coming back to this. Nielson ratings have CU not in the top 10 this year.
https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/this-years-most-watched-cfb-teams/
The trick here is the innocuous caveat "average viewers when playing on Nielsen-rated networks."

ALL of CU's games were on Nielsen-rated networks. Kentucky, for example, only played 4 times on such networks this season. Those were presumably Kentucky's most popular games. If you average out Colorado's 4 most popular games, you get 5.2 million viewers, equivalent to Michigan, which was 6th.
 
The trick here is the innocuous caveat "average viewers when playing on Nielsen-rated networks."

ALL of CU's games were on Nielsen-rated networks. Kentucky, for example, only played 4 times on such networks this season. Those were presumably Kentucky's most popular games. If you average out Colorado's 4 most popular games, you get 5.2 million viewers, equivalent to Michigan, which was 6th.
Fair enough, so about the rating from the article I posted yesterday.
 
And while they are improving things. Am I the only one that thinks the 50 yard line Ralphie orientation should be flipped along with the band pre-game and halftime show. Everything is mostly directed to the West side. Home team stands on the East side, most students are East side. I believe everything should be oriented towards the East side.
TV cameras are on the West side
 
I always thought the crimson tide was a monthly anger rage.

"Hey Dad, what's Mom's problem? She just yelled at me for no reason!"

<Dad sighs>

"Come here, son. I guess it's time to have a talk about the Crimson Tide."


UBL, but whatever.
 
The Big 12 standings at the end of the season was a cluster-F as we all know, so what could be done differently to make things work better and be more creative and exciting. How about this idea where we form two divisions each year (Not Fixed), formed by end of season standings using records and tiebreakers to mix it up, and then you play 7 games within your division to find the top TWO teams in each divisions and then cross play a semi and final, and also provide for end of year matching games for the other teams to get their 8th and 9th games.

Screenshot 2024-12-11 at 6.50.23 PM.png
 
The Big 12 standings at the end of the season was a cluster-F as we all know, so what could be done differently to make things work better and be more creative and exciting. How about this idea where we form two divisions each year (Not Fixed), formed by end of season standings using records and tiebreakers to mix it up, and then you play 7 games within your division to find the top TWO teams in each divisions and then cross play a semi and final, and also provide for end of year matching games for the other teams to get their 8th and 9th games.

View attachment 79479

Big 12 was great drama this year. No thanks to divisions and given how they worked in the old Big 12 and Pac-12, might as well never do divisions again.
 
Big 12 was great drama this year. No thanks to divisions and given how they worked in the old Big 12 and Pac-12, might as well never do divisions again.
It wasn’t good drama at all. It was entirely anticlimactic and I don’t feel the two best teams actually played for championship. Going 2-3 levels deep on tie breakers to determine the CCG matchup because the teams didn’t play each other sucks
 
Fixed divisions sucked
I propose fluid and balanced divisions
I think that you can balance divisions very well by doing the zipper thing. That keeps one side from gaining recruiting advantages due to location.

For the Big 12, it might be:

Great Eight
Arizona State
Utah
Colorado
Kansas
TCU
Houston
Cincinnati
UCF

Super 8
Arizona
BYU
Oklahoma State
Kansas State
Texas Tech
Baylor
Iowa State
West Virginia
 
Coming back to this. Nielson ratings have CU not in the top 10 this year.
https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/this-years-most-watched-cfb-teams/
CU is a top 5 draw. Everyone is rooting for us or against us. We draw ratings against FCS teams and second and third tier P4 teams that few (if any) other teams could get. If we had more marquee competition in the Big 12, the ratings would be through the roof. You know it. I know it. The American people know it.
 
No, we are not. If you think we are, show the actual ratings where we are.
stripes lighten GIF
 
Back
Top