Don't forget the punchable face - and credit to whoever on here first said that about a week ago
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
CU MBB Rankings/NET/KenPom/Bracketology Catch-All
- Thread starter FM-Buff
- Start date
Don't forget the punchable face - and credit to whoever on here first said that about a week ago
Put his jersey in the rafters.
Yes an aq is in the tournament, but have to beat Oregon to get the aq.
That would normally be the case, but….
Same sort of thing on a questionable 3 pointer. They can go back and review if the foot was behind the line or not and change the points if necessary.
Robert Sorell
Well-Known Member
Looking forward to doing a post mortem on Lunardi's final bracket.
I can’t remember who posted this site, but it basically allows you to see similar resumes of basketball teams going back to 2008, and to find teams who have had similar efficiency profiles over the same timeframe:
Key takeaways:
Compare Tourney Resumes - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats - T-Rank
T-Rank College Basketball Ratings and Rankings. And fun.
barttorvik.com
Key takeaways:
- Teams with resumes similar to Colorado’s have generally landed on the 8/9 seed line (average 8.5)
- Only 3/10 advanced past the first round and only 1/10 made the Sweet 16
- Tourney Teams with efficiency profiles similar to colorado’s have fared better- they’ve typically been around a 6/7 seed and all but 4 of the 10 most similar advanced past the first round, with one team making the Elite 8 and one team making the Final 4
BuffLuke80
Well-Known Member
Let's just get the W and not even give these fvckers the chance to bend us over.
Curiously he only has 3 PAC 12 teams dancing….
Well if we win tonight that's all it's gonna be is 3 teams
With Kansas having a subpar year by their standards I wonder if the committee will send them elsewhere instead of Omaha.
On second thought, nah won't happen
On second thought, nah won't happen
KenPom loves Auburn. Has them #4.
Looking at it in more detail, that Q1 record doesn’t include todays win over MS State, and they beat South Carolina so badly yesterday that it made them drop out of the top 50 and cost them two Q1 wins. Their non conference is similar to ours, some wins over some power teams that were supposed to be good (USC and Indiana) that ended up being crappy teams.
Yea, I guess I don't understand the NET rankings enough to know how Auburn is ranked so high despite that 1-7 record as you said
It helps when those are the only games you lost.
I still feel very confident about getting in but enough has happened tonight to make things a little dicey - UNM a possible bid stealer, an AAC possible bid stealer, NC State, and now Oregon
This is a very strange years. Lots of super high quality bubble teams, and some aren't getting in. If anyone in top 30 in NET is left out, they gotta throw that system away and find a new one. If you are a top 30 team and can't make the tournament then you shouldn't be defined as a top 30 team.
RalphieMalph
Well-Known Member
If I were a person who has money, I’d wager pretty heavily that they won’t get in. Colorado almost always gets left out when they’re on the bubble. Remember that team with Cory Higgins and Alec Burks from like 13 or so years ago? They weren’t even considered to be on the bubble and they got left out anyway.
seattlebuff
Well-Known Member
If St Johns, Seton Hall and Virginia are truly the first 3 out ... we're screwed. The biased-as-**** committee absolutely puts all of them in before us.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
You shouldn't feel dicey. Lunardi didn't even have us as one of his 6 bubble teams in his morning update. We weren't in his "last four byes" or his "last 4 in", which means even to his dumb ass, nothing that happened today effected Colorado.
BuffBronco
Well-Known Member
seattlebuff
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I think we’re out. Too many bids stolen today and too much bias to overcome. No way 4 Pac 12 teams get in. It’s 2011 all over again. And what it clearly says is that NET is meaningless, when it was supposed to be the great decider.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
You realize we were in the 60's in RPI in 2011 right?
We were absolutely a fringe bubble team that year.
True, but Seattle's right about the 4 bids to the Pac. For the past month it's been all about how the Pac is a 2 bid conference. Seems highly unlikely that they're going to double that. Hope I'm wrong, but I think Oregon stole our spot.