ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...aluating-job-security-of-all-129-fbs-coaches/
He has MM at a 4....
He has MM at a 4....
IMO MM should be at a 5. After the drop off last year, he has to win to be gone.
I see no reason to believe the W mark is set any higher than 4. If MikMac hits that, he is probably safe. I, personally, would not be happy, and would likely be in favor of a change, but the admin. seems pretty happy with him, and barring some total embarrassment, he will be here for 2019.I don’t think MM gets fired this year barring a total collapse. There will be a lot of unhappy people if they go 5-7, but MM will still have a job here, IMO.
I agree. I don't see them buying him out, and I like the guy, but we need to start winning. If it was up to me it would be bowl game or gone.I think the only thing that keeps him here with another losing season is his buyout being too big.
I agree. I don't see them buying him out, and I like the guy, but we need to start winning. If it was up to me it would be bowl game or gone.
Maybe he could pull it off, MM just has to win and then we have no worries.I think RG could probably pull it off if he had to, and there's no Kevin Sumlin like clause in MM's contract that says he needs to be paid out in 60 days. The optics of this are a whole different matter though.....and getting people like Jack Kroll to okay a buyout might be problem if it comes to it.
I see no reason to believe the W mark is set any higher than 4. If MikMac hits that, he is probably safe. I, personally, would not be happy, and would likely be in favor of a change, but the admin. seems pretty happy with him, and barring some total embarrassment, he will be here for 2019.
I don’t think he’s predicting a 4-win season. He’s only saying a 5-win season won’t get MM fired.Dear lord I hope you're wrong.....makes '16 look like an epic fluke.
I don’t think he’s predicting a 4-win season. He’s only saying a 5-win season won’t get MM fired.
Your opinion of Rick George mustn't be very high then.What us pinheads think should be the minimum required number of wins and what RG thinks are likely two very different things. In fact, I wouldn’t be shocked if the number of wins is one of several factors that will contribute to his assessment of MM’s abilities.
I don’t know what have you that idea. I’m merely saying that the W/L record won’t be the sole factor in evaluating MM’s performance.Your opinion of Rick George mustn't be very high then.
Of course not, but after year 6, it should be the biggest factor. Going 5-7 would put his CU coaching record at 30-45 overall and 15-39 in conference play with one bowl game appearance. CU being a dumpster fire when he got here or not, it's time to go at least .500 on a consistent basis, and regardless of other things, if he can't do that at this point, he should be asked to move on.I don’t know what have you that idea. I’m merely saying that the W/L record won’t be the sole factor in evaluating MM’s performance.
The only difference is that Hawkins inherited a team that went 7-6 (5-3) and won the Big 12 North. We all know what MM inherited... Because of that, I don't like the Hawkins comparison at all, even if W/L is similar, but it doesn't excuse MM not getting this team to a bowl game in year 6.For a little perspective here, in 5 full seasons at CU, MacIntyre has lost 38 games. In just under 5 full seasons at CU, Dan Hawkins lost 39 games. If MM misses a bowl game again this season, he has to go. I understand the financial and political ramifications that firing him would bring, but if RG is serious about building and maintaining a winning program, then there is no way MM can survive another losing season.
You are absolutely free to that opinion. I think RG takes a different approach.Of course not, but after year 6, it should be the biggest factor. Going 5-7 would put his CU coaching record at 30-45 overall and 15-39 in conference play with one bowl game appearance. CU being a dumpster fire when he got here or not, it's time to go at least .500 on a consistent basis, and regardless of other things, if he can't do that at this point, he should be asked to move on.
I don’t know what have you that idea. I’m merely saying that the W/L record won’t be the sole factor in evaluating MM’s performance.
5-7 translates to 3-6 in conference.Of course not, but after year 6, it should be the biggest factor. Going 5-7 would put his CU coaching record at 30-45 overall and 15-39 in conference play with one bowl game appearance. CU being a dumpster fire when he got here or not, it's time to go at least .500 on a consistent basis, and regardless of other things, if he can't do that at this point, he should be asked to move on.
Yes, I forgot to specify that I'm assuming 3 P12 wins if they go 5-7 overall. For those saying he's safe even at 4 wins, a 4-8 record would most likely mean 2 conference wins... Really??5-7 translates to 3-6 in conference.
1, 0, 1, 8, 2, 3(?). Jeez.
He needs to win 5 conference games.
Lots of alums and boosters don't think Herm is a good fit. And he recently had the whole "we're going to start cutting people, and if you're injured then I don't have any film to grade you on.... guess what, I said that, and suddenly kids weren't injured anymore" thing.Herm Edwards has "pressure mounting" before even one game is played? Who puts out a list like this sorted alphabetically by school?
For a little perspective here, in 5 full seasons at CU, MacIntyre has lost 38 games. In just under 5 full seasons at CU, Dan Hawkins lost 39 games. If MM misses a bowl game again this season, he has to go. I understand the financial and political ramifications that firing him would bring, but if RG is serious about building and maintaining a winning program, then there is no way MM can survive another losing season.