Ripp
Woke bitch
No, just posting info. that I thought was interesting.Are you affiliated with Ralphie Report?
No, just posting info. that I thought was interesting.Are you affiliated with Ralphie Report?
No, just posting info. that I thought was interesting.
Yeah, I keep going back to him too. After seeing his training video and reading about how good a recruiter he is, I'm not sure we want to pass on this guy, someone's gonna grab him soon. It's still a gamble but anyone RG picks is going to be a gamble. He seems like a real smart guy and he's charismatic. I think he might be worth the gamble.Honestly
You guys have swung me to this guy!
The players would love him
He would elevate recruiting
It would hurt Washington and we would have inside knowledge
I approve of this guy!
Babers #2, but he does not have as many pluses in conference as Lake. I would bet this guy has some seriously good staff options up his sleeve.
Yeah. No worries if you were. We'd just want you to identify that. AB is friendly with RR and are more than happy to link their content.No, just posting info. that I thought was interesting.
Are you back to rooting for CU againIf we want a HC with a defensive background then this is it.
My question is do we want that or should CU look for an offensive minded HC?
Hmm. Some serious intrigue here for sure. Is he ready to be a full time coach though.
I wore my CU sweatshirt yesterday at Boondocks at a birthday party for my daughter's friend.I tried my best to follow the game on my phone and was rooting for the Buffs. Thanks for asking.Are you back to rooting for CU again
Atta boyI wore my CU sweatshirt yesterday at Boondocks at a birthday party for my daughter's friend.I tried my best to follow the game on my phone and was rooting for the Buffs. Thanks for asking.
Hmm. Some serious intrigue here for sure. Is he ready to be a full time coach though.
Assume you mean full time head coach--he's obviously a full time assistant already. He seems to embody a lot of the traits that you'd be looking for in a head coach. Technical acumen, reputation as a tremendous teacher, great recruiter, has been mentored under a great head coach (Petersen) for several years now, personable in a way that would seemingly play well with donors/boosters. Just checks a lot of the boxes.
Plus very few people run a college football team better than Petersen. Washington's been the best in the Pac-12. Taking a page out of the recent playbooks in the SEC by hiring the best coach working for the top dog program isn't a bad strategy.He checks off the two biggest wants for me:
1) Great recruiting
2) Teaching X's and O's
Odds are it will be someone else but man, this guy could be great. We'll see.
And you’re basing this off of? Just curious.
Re-read this thread.
1. He recruits the team’s best players.
2. He’s learned from one of the nation’s best coaches.
3. He’s received promotions and top end treatment at one of the best programs in our conference.
4. He’s in the right age bracket for a successful coach.
5. He’s demonstrated his acumen against our team and many others in this conference.
There’s more. Looking at a lot of the top guys, a good % of them were #1 assistants at P5 schools under high level coaches. Lake is worth the risk.
I’m not saying he is not. I just asked for your opinion, I don’t have one. His background is intriguing and he seems to be successful at the things we need most. We’ll see what RG thinks.
To be fair, Nik says a lot of stuff.He's been a co-DC for one year. Kwiatkowski (who is still there) built that defense (verbatim from Kwiatkowski's UW bio).
It does say something that Lake was promoted to co-DC last year as Petersen clearly has been trying to keep him happy. I am intrigued by him as I think being the guy who built a defense isn't a prerequisite for being a HC. I'd just be cautious (after all, Nik was calling Adams a superstar not long ago). Lake's the type of potential superstar hire that would put him at or near the top of my list to do a deep dive on.
I do. Sometimes spitballing, sometimes generating conversation by intentionally going over the top, sometimes being overly emotional and reacting.To be fair, Nik says a lot of stuff.
Unfortunately, I don’t think Lake will be on RG’s radar.
He's been a co-DC for one year. Kwiatkowski (who is still there) built that defense (verbatim from Kwiatkowski's UW bio).
It does say something that Lake was promoted to co-DC last year as Petersen clearly has been trying to keep him happy. I am intrigued by him as I think being the guy who built a defense isn't a prerequisite for being a HC. I'd just be cautious (after all, Nik was calling Adams a superstar not long ago). Lake's the type of potential superstar hire that would put him at or near the top of my list to do a deep dive on.
I think it's almost impossible that any OC or DC of the top 3-4 teams in the conference is off of any conference AD's radar.Unfortunately, I don’t think Lake will be on RG’s radar.
Nik wasn't the only one, and I was just poking fun. Most of us, me included, thought Adams was going to fix our OL. We thought Chev was the golden goose as well.To be fair, Nik says a lot of stuff.
Petersen did give him playcalling responsibilities, though. So more than a ceremonial promotion to get him a title & coin in order to keep him.Nik wasn't the only one, and I was just poking fun. Most of us, me included, thought Adams was going to fix our OL. We thought Chev was the golden goose as well.
After Hawkins, I look at any hire questioningly, rather than getting all fired up.
Lake's one "unknown" is that he was elevated to co-DC with the guy who was the DC who built a great D.
Is Lake a great mind? A great leader? Or is he just a great DB coach and recruiter, so great, that Petersen wanted to pay him more and give him that co-DC title to keep him recruiting?
If Lake was just a great recruiter, I'd be wary. But he seems to have built his DB system, managed it, coached it, under a guy who demands perfection. So I'm pretty sure he can scale that skillset up to a full roster. If he checks out, I'd think he's worth that small risk.
I suppose we’ve gotta accept there’s gonna be risk no matter who ya hire. And we may have 2-3 rough “building” seasons ahead of us.Nik wasn't the only one, and I was just poking fun. Most of us, me included, thought Adams was going to fix our OL. We thought Chev was the golden goose as well.
After Hawkins, I look at any hire questioningly, rather than getting all fired up.
Lake's one "unknown" is that he was elevated to co-DC with the guy who was the DC who built a great D.
Is Lake a great mind? A great leader? Or is he just a great DB coach and recruiter, so great, that Petersen wanted to pay him more and give him that co-DC title to keep him recruiting?
If Lake was just a great recruiter, I'd be wary. But he seems to have built his DB system, managed it, coached it, under a guy who demands perfection. So I'm pretty sure he can scale that skillset up to a full roster. If he checks out, I'd think he's worth that small risk.