Sorry, I know that there's "no feeding the trolls," but I can't help myself because the previously reported numbers are wrong.
He said, "Basketball," right? I think the numbers reported above included only MEN'S BB and Volleyball (however, as mentioned before, unless I missed something they are not correct).
2011-12 avg attendance (except VB, which is contained in a single year(2011))
So, for Men's BB and Volleyball, it would be: 8,562 for CU And 6,344 for CSU (difference of 2,218: 25.9% from CU's perspective or 34.9% from CSU's perspective)
However, for ALL BB and VB, it would be: 11,241 vs 7,617 (difference of 3,624: 32.2% from CU's perspective or 47.5% from CSU's)
Also, that's average attendance. CU played more home games in WBB, MBB and VB.
2011-12 total attendance (except VB, which is contained in a single year(2011))
So, for Men's BB and Volleyball, it would be: 134,715 for CU And 88,704 for CSU (difference of 46,011: 34.2% from CU's perspective or 51.8% from CSU's perspective)
However, for ALL BB and VB, it would be: 182,931 vs 105,248 (difference of 77,683: 42.4% from CU's perspective or 73.8% from CSU's)
The only way it's CLOSE is if you compare JUST Men's BB average attendance with total attendance across 3 sports from CSU, and even then CU comes out ahead (7,804 vs 7,617).
After running the above numbers in comparison with Gasm's "venture," ICON see why the CSEwes believe the numbers in the feasibility report:
"25.9%? hell, that's ~. Let's BE BOLD and build us a stadium!"
Sources:
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weeklyrpi/2012WBBattend1.html
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools...uto_pdf/2011-12/misc_non_event/Attendance.pdf
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+ncaa+mens+basketball+attendance
He said, "Basketball," right? I think the numbers reported above included only MEN'S BB and Volleyball (however, as mentioned before, unless I missed something they are not correct).
2011-12 avg attendance (except VB, which is contained in a single year(2011))
CU | CSU | |
Men's BB | 7,804 | 4,193 |
Women's BB | 2,679 | 1,273 |
Volleyball | 758 | 2,151 |
So, for Men's BB and Volleyball, it would be: 8,562 for CU And 6,344 for CSU (difference of 2,218: 25.9% from CU's perspective or 34.9% from CSU's perspective)
However, for ALL BB and VB, it would be: 11,241 vs 7,617 (difference of 3,624: 32.2% from CU's perspective or 47.5% from CSU's)
Also, that's average attendance. CU played more home games in WBB, MBB and VB.
2011-12 total attendance (except VB, which is contained in a single year(2011))
CU | CSU | |
Men's BB (16 gms vs 15) | 124,860 | 62,889 |
Women's BB (18 gms vs 13) | 48,216 | 16,544 |
Volleyball (13 gms vs 12) | 9,855 | 25,815 |
So, for Men's BB and Volleyball, it would be: 134,715 for CU And 88,704 for CSU (difference of 46,011: 34.2% from CU's perspective or 51.8% from CSU's perspective)
However, for ALL BB and VB, it would be: 182,931 vs 105,248 (difference of 77,683: 42.4% from CU's perspective or 73.8% from CSU's)
The only way it's CLOSE is if you compare JUST Men's BB average attendance with total attendance across 3 sports from CSU, and even then CU comes out ahead (7,804 vs 7,617).
After running the above numbers in comparison with Gasm's "venture," ICON see why the CSEwes believe the numbers in the feasibility report:
"25.9%? hell, that's ~. Let's BE BOLD and build us a stadium!"
Sources:
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weeklyrpi/2012WBBattend1.html
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools...uto_pdf/2011-12/misc_non_event/Attendance.pdf
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+ncaa+mens+basketball+attendance