As I said before, the norm of allowing other schools to talk to your coaches re poaching them needs to change. It is essentially a waiver of all tortious interference claims for these sorts of damage claims.
To quote the great Harvey Korman: “No more Mr. Goodbar.”
It's not like college coaching contracts are written in a vacuum. You don't have to include a "buyout clause" (which is actually a liquidated damages clause), you can just write an employment contract for a certain number of years. If you do that, however, breaking up is terribly messy. Fire the coach and he's entitled to the remainder of the contracted for salary, but maybe he has a duty to mitigate and you can deduct his next salary from what you owe, maybe you have to sue when he takes minimum wage for his next job. As I said-- messy. Let's say the coach quits. Courts are loathe to force someone to work for you even if they had a contract, so you're not going to be able to keep the guy against his will--not that you would want to. Does the coach then owe you what remains of his contractual salary? No, he's not doing the job anymore, someone else is. Do you have damages? Maybe, how do you value them?
This is why coaching salaries have buyout terms. Plus, it's not like CU can unilaterally decide to only offer contracts outside the norm for college coaches.
Last edited: