BuffLuke80
Well-Known Member
Maybe the rehab. Could be longer to get 100, if ever. It's a ****ed up injury. He's young so maybe it will work out.It’s like an ACL, so 6-12 months.
Maybe the rehab. Could be longer to get 100, if ever. It's a ****ed up injury. He's young so maybe it will work out.It’s like an ACL, so 6-12 months.
So you tore it today? I’m confusedI may be the only Allbuffer to have experienced this injury? I tore mine at the ripe old age of 35.
Regardless, my recovery was about 10 months, but with the access to the Champions Center and age, I imagine Nate will recover quicker.
Three years on, I feel 100%, less the calf muscle atrophy. That is my only lingering issue. Nate will be fine and hopefully get the payday he deserves.
It was a typo. He tore it when he was 32.So you tore it today? I’m confused
Sorry if this was posted elsewhere- a WELL EARNED CONGRATS to him!
I think if he was healthy at the end of the year he would have been. Honestly, if CU played a full schedule he would have won linebacker of the year.Landman got snubbed. Should’ve been first team.
I agree that this was the rationalizations in the voters’ minds. I don’t agree with it.I think if he was healthy at the end of the year he would have been. Honestly, if CU played a full schedule he would have won linebacker of the year.
More like November-DecemberBut will be be healthy come September? I thought the recovery time was significant for surgery on an Achilles' tendon.
More sweet than bitterBitter sweet, for sure.
Not for me. He was ready to begin his NFL career which he now has to put on hold.More sweet than bitter
He probably sounded out the NFL scouts. Was a mid round draft pick before he got hurt. Would have gone undrafted. Might as well come back, get healthy and go through the draft process next year.Definitely not unhappy about this, but curious as to why he is coming back to potentially play 4-5 games vs landing on an NFL roster?
It's a lyricNot for me. He was ready to begin his NFL career which he now has to put on hold.