hawg1
Well-Known Member
Damn right I’m gonna watch USC.
regarding NIL, it’s become unsustainable. NIL remains legit mechanism as structured. Collectives are where the problems arise IMO.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
NIL act passed - NCAA allows athletes to monetise their name, image, likeness
- Thread starter Creebuzz
- Start date
regarding NIL, it’s become unsustainable. NIL remains legit mechanism as structured. Collectives are where the problems arise IMO.
It really all boils down to enough Schools wanting a structured system from whatever you want to call this **** show. Either way, college football is and will be a shell of its former self. I'm interested in a very structured system that still let's the players receive NIL, but with a more restrictive transfer model (can't transfer for a year after enrolling, very harsh penalties for tampering, etc.).
Can you explain this? I don’t know what this means.
I think you can still make NIL work in a more traditional system, but it would only work for that second tier of players who aren’t out there pulling in $3MM deals. For the top end guys, they’re gonna get theirs and there will only be a handful of schools willing to play that game.
You may also need to work on a compensation system for the school that loses players because there is absolutely no incentive for some schools to invest time and resources into players when they fully well know they can just walk away with no strings attached once they attract "bigger" offers.
The biggest issue was this: players needed to be paid, but Title IX made it impossible for the schools to do it. NIL makes it possible for athletes in all sports to get paid by the highest bidder.
Is it unsustainable? Maybe. I am skeptical because what NIL is really revealing is the extent to which people have an appetite for winning college sports games (as well as the physical attractiveness of a more limited number of mostly female athletes). Rich people have acquired a lot of money to spend, especially in the last 5-10 years.
The last time Colorado was good at football was when we paid players. We stopped being good at football when we stopped paying players. It’s not different. It’s just that the pies are bigger.
A lot of guys left too. Player quality determines your success in college football. Look at the top 100 players from the NFL draft and you’ll see a strong relationship between those players’ college team success.
B. Rice and M. Blackmon will have their shot to compete for playing time on a winning team. They would not have that chance at Colorado.
hawg1
Well-Known Member
There are two general paths to NIL money. 1) Exchanges where marketplaces exist to connect sponsor and athletes. Generally in line with original NIL intent.
2) Collectives where interested boosters create a massive pool of money (ASU most recent with 7 figures) to hand out for athlete activities, some even supporting charities. This is more of an option that involves dark side of NIL such as pay-to-play, tampering , recruiting.
RG likes exchanges. CU has one. RG does not like collectives. CU does not have one. CU is behind on both aspects.
here’s an article
Tracker: University-Specific NIL Collectives
Check out the collectives being founded by alumni and boosters to help student athletes at specific schools land NIL deals.
businessofcollegesports.com
Maybe Rice and Blackmon can suck up to their rich new USC buddies and get a few steak dinners out of it.
RG needs to get with the times or go work for a D2 school with D2 Dan.There are two general paths to NIL money. 1) Exchanges where marketplaces exist to connect sponsor and athletes. Generally in line with original NIL intent.
2) Collectives where interested boosters create a massive pool of money (ASU most recent with 7 figures) to hand out for athlete activities, some even supporting charities. This is more of an option that involves dark side of NIL such as pay-to-play, tampering , recruiting.
RG likes exchanges. CU has one. RG does not like collectives. CU does not have one. CU is behind on both aspects.
here’s an article
Tracker: University-Specific NIL Collectives
Check out the collectives being founded by alumni and boosters to help student athletes at specific schools land NIL deals.
CU should do a revenue share with its athletes structured like the pro league collective bargaining agreements. Heck, the whole Pac-12 should go to that.
Problem with the PAC 12 doing that is that USC doesn’t need that. Oregon probably doesn’t either. So those two will still be off making their own deals.
oh USC would go ape****. Doubt we would be able to compete with the SEC either. It's a great idea though.
Remember when y’all said that U$C being back would be great for the conference???????????
Anyone who tries to tell you this wouldn’t happen immediately is full of ****!
But but but, the student athletes must be compensated.
What’s the going rate for a back up kick returner?
RG likes losing because he is a loser. Just like Distefano, Cardboard and PlatiThere are two general paths to NIL money. 1) Exchanges where marketplaces exist to connect sponsor and athletes. Generally in line with original NIL intent.
2) Collectives where interested boosters create a massive pool of money (ASU most recent with 7 figures) to hand out for athlete activities, some even supporting charities. This is more of an option that involves dark side of NIL such as pay-to-play, tampering , recruiting.
RG likes exchanges. CU has one. RG does not like collectives. CU does not have one. CU is behind on both aspects.
here’s an article
Tracker: University-Specific NIL Collectives
Check out the collectives being founded by alumni and boosters to help student athletes at specific schools land NIL deals.
That’s the spirit!
$12,500, a 2006 Prius with 220,000 miles on it, and a 30 day subscription to a porn site. But hurry, other schools might join the bidding......
which site?
GoBuffs08
Well-Known Member
https://dailysnark.com/2022/05/06/t...fzQK0C9rn5SX9_6UxBkYl6dtSS2HOmRTl1IIiJnGBKbg4
Not sure what the monthly insurance runs to cover a 20 year old driving a Lambo but whatever
Not sure what the monthly insurance runs to cover a 20 year old driving a Lambo but whatever
I’m sure he’ll be on Dealer Full-use plates and be covered under the dealership’s umbrella policy.
SeanMSan
Well-Known Member
probably a better chance than being picked in the draft coming out of TX (still laughing about this past draft for Texas)
DI Board of Directors issues name, image and likeness guidance to schools - NCAA.org
The Division I Board of Directors on Monday issued guidance to schools regarding the intersection between recruiting activities and the name, image and likeness
www.ncaa.org
“Specifically, the guidance defines as a booster any third-party entity that promotes an athletics program, assists with recruiting or assists with providing benefits to recruits, enrolled student-athletes or their family members. The definition could include "collectives" set up to funnel name, image and likeness deals to prospective student-athletes or enrolled student-athletes who might be considering transferring. NCAA recruiting rules preclude boosters from recruiting and/or providing benefits to prospective student-athletes.
The guidance is effective immediately. For violations that occurred prior to May 9, 2022, the board directed the enforcement staff to review the facts of individual cases but to pursue only those actions that clearly are contrary to the published interim policy, including the most severe violations of recruiting rules or payment for athletics performance.”
****ing seriously? Good luck.
hawg1
Well-Known Member
They will be challenged immediately in court: 1) definition of booster; 2) impediment to player earning NIL.DI Board of Directors issues name, image and likeness guidance to schools - NCAA.org
The Division I Board of Directors on Monday issued guidance to schools regarding the intersection between recruiting activities and the name, image and likeness
“Specifically, the guidance defines as a booster any third-party entity that promotes an athletics program, assists with recruiting or assists with providing benefits to recruits, enrolled student-athletes or their family members. The definition could include "collectives" set up to funnel name, image and likeness deals to prospective student-athletes or enrolled student-athletes who might be considering transferring. NCAA recruiting rules preclude boosters from recruiting and/or providing benefits to prospective student-athletes.
The guidance is effective immediately. For violations that occurred prior to May 9, 2022, the board directed the enforcement staff to review the facts of individual cases but to pursue only those actions that clearly are contrary to the published interim policy, including the most severe violations of recruiting rules or payment for athletics performance.”
****ing seriously? Good luck.
it will accelerate implosion of NCAA.
Still trying to put that genie back in the bottle. Or, perhaps, putting everything back in pandora's box. Good luck with that.
What’s depressing about the NIL deals is that they are going to the players who were already on track to get an NFL contract at the end of their college career. It’s good that they are getting paid but the vast majority of college players aren’t going to see much/anything. The more things change
What I don't get about this is where was the NCAA when NIL took off last year? They just sat back and watched