If only he didn’t suck so damn hard at literally every thing. Bastard.
Truth
If only he didn’t suck so damn hard at literally every thing. Bastard.
Can we just stick to the " get better " partWe’re in that donut hole of being too good at home for programs to want to risk playing in Boulder when we’re not good enough overall to make that road loss (with a likely return win at home) enough of a positive on NET.
To see better teams come to the Keg, we need to get better or worse.
Something that needs to happen is for Larry Scott and the Pac-12 officers to get off their asses to sign a B1G and Big 12 challenges as annual things. It had been very close to happening in the past and needs to become a thing.Can we just stick to the " get better " part
Something that needs to happen is for Larry Scott and the Pac-12 officers to get off their asses to sign a B1G and Big 12 challenges as annual things. It had been very close to happening in the past and needs to become a thing.
We actually had an announcement that Michigan was on the schedule as part of a B1G challenge that would happen as a break from conference play late in the season. Then they walked it back, never to be mentioned again. Maybe 5-7 years ago now?I just quickly looked, and I can't find any contractual information for the ACC/B1G challenge. So, I'm surprised that you say a PAC/B1G challenge was close to happening. Can you expand?
But yeah, I think we all agree that a PAC/Big12 challenge should have been happening for years. Hope you're right that it was close to being agreed to in the past.
Buffs up to 86 in offensive efficiency after win over Dayton.
Dayton is 66th in defensive efficiency which is good.
Crazy they scored 22 and 59 points per halfBuffs are now 35th in offensive efficiency after the Stanford game.
I didn't think our offense was poorly run in the 1st half. Trees played great defense, but we worked to open shots and FT attempts. Just didn't make a damn thing. 2nd half was just as ridiculous with our shooting, but the other way. I suppose that in the grand scheme of things it ended up going in the books as an above average shooting night.Crazy they scored 22 and 59 points per half
And Stanford made the same percentage half to half. Weird gameI didn't think our offense was poorly run in the 1st half. Trees played great defense, but we worked to open shots and FT attempts. Just didn't make a damn thing. 2nd half was just as ridiculous with our shooting, but the other way. I suppose that in the grand scheme of things it ended up going in the books as an above average shooting night.
That's pretty much every team in the country.If we aren't hitting 3s, our offense is awful. We are one of those live by the three die by the three teams at this point.
We've seen Rick Randall and crew before, and while he's a very chatty guy (guy in front of me gets to know all the refs, and had a long chat with him during a time out). I recall his calls and that of his crew to be either very inconsistent or very technical. . like intentionally trying to catch that foul no one else see or getting attention for the call. But as a 35+ year soccer official I understand not all calls have to be "right" but "acceptable" to the discerning objective fan. But with the visiting team, who ratings suggest they shouldn't win at the league leader's home court, and they ahead by 6 pts, the first half is closing in seconds, trying to get that last shot off, and it's 3, and a home team defender tries to block. . even if there's body contact or hand/arm contact. . you . . let . . it . . go. Visiting coach may be upset as his players, but to make this call under these circumstances. . home coach/team/fans frustrated with surprising being behind. . with 0.2 second left. . and even the replay and the TV announcers say there was no contact/no foul. . . people are going to be upset. Boyle isn't afraid to get a ref's ear, but he seems to know when to do it, and when to stop, and he was livid.(we sit next the CU team 2nd row on the end) and he was livid! I didn't see the technical call, but was shocked when #3 got 5 shots and made them all. I wasn't sure Randall was going to exit the arena easily, but had police escort.You note both offense and defense run either team, but it's seems defense is always more noticeable then offense, at least for me. CU defense is remarkable, do a good job keeping up man-to-man, I don't care for when Battey, el al, try to set the pick on the guard, because he's not that quick and can't get back in time to defend under basket. Stanford centers were excellent at this. So was their defense. They stymied CU the first half and adding almost 80% shooting the first part of the 1st half. Could tell CU and Boyle were flustered. Cal seemed to figure out how to slow CU as well. Add to this poor shooting and horrible free throw shooting, it didn't bode well. Usually on an intense defense from the opponents, they get into the bonus situation and free-throws will catch you up or at least keep up the scoring. When you're missing the first FT every time, not going to work. Stanford was amazing and deserves credit. But everything changed with 0.2 sec left in the 1st half.