Tennessee's search is forcing NC State to go all in on mediocrity
IMO, NC State is a very underrated job so he would be wise to use that leverage to get more money for him and his staff.
Tennessee's search is forcing NC State to go all in on mediocrity
I'm just saying, Dave Doeren doesn't seem to be a special coach. Overall record of 33-30 at NC State with a 15-25 ACC record. Even if you take away his first year, where they went 0-8 in ACC, he is still 15-17 in conference play. To me, that's the definition of mediocre, but NC State is being forced to throw a bunch of money at him.IMO, NC State is a very underrated job so he would be wise to use that leverage to get more money for him and his staff.
Tennessee is offering him $3 million a year though, do you think offering him $3.5 is really throwing money at him? That salary doesn't seem to be overboard at all. Mac is getting 3 and he is mid-Pac-12.I'm just saying, Dave Doeren doesn't seem to be a special coach. Overall record of 33-30 at NC State with a 15-25 ACC record. Even if you take away his first year, where they went 0-8 in ACC, he is still 15-17 in conference play. To me, that's the definition of mediocre, but NC State is being forced to throw a bunch of money at him.
I didn't see the specific numbers, so that doesn't seem as bad, but they are also increasing assistant salary pool. Regardless, my original point still stands.Tennessee is offering him $3 million a year though, do you think offering him $3.5 is really throwing money at him? That salary doesn't seem to be overboard at all. Mac is getting 3 and he is mid-Pac-12.
Increasing the assistant salary pool should never be looked at as throwing money around though IMO.I didn't see the specific numbers, so that doesn't seem as bad, but they are also increasing assistant salary pool. Regardless, my original point still stands.
Lol I agree. My point is that NC State is having to increase their financial commitments in order to retain a mediocre coach.Increasing the assistant salary pool should never be looked at as throwing money around though IMO.
Yep. He’s the bad guy in the Tennessee relationship he had. I think people are forgetting that.This lane kiffen stuff is hilarious but just another example of why you don’t want him to be your coach.
IMO, NC State is a very underrated job so he would be wise to use that leverage to get more money for him and his staff.
Lol I agree. My point is that NC State is having to increase their financial commitments in order to retain a mediocre coach.
No. All quotes, no cattle.do we need to fear herm edwards?
I have to say this Tennessee coaching search is the biggest clusterfuk I’ve ever witnessed. It’s almost as though Currie is just floating names out there to see what the masses will accept.
Which again, ignores context and what it takes to build a program, Wisconsin style. In the only valid way to anylise his work ,look at both records in conference, and things like margins and other analytics, and I think you will see that Doeren has done nothing but make steady and real progress. I don't have the analytics, but here's NCST under Doeren in conference:I'm just saying, Dave Doeren doesn't seem to be a special coach. Overall record of 33-30 at NC State with a 15-25 ACC record. Even if you take away his first year, where they went 0-8 in ACC, he is still 15-17 in conference play. To me, that's the definition of mediocre, but NC State is being forced to throw a bunch of money at him.
If he keeps the current staff, like reported, then I think that would be a perfect scenario for everyone else in Pac 12 South.do we need to fear herm edwards?
Yes, there's been solid and steady improvement under Doeren, just like there has been under Mac at CU. I'm not saying he's a bad coach by any stretch; I just said he's mediocre and I think it's interesting/comical that a supposed high level program like Tennessee has to "settle" for someone like that, which is legitimately option #10 for them.Which again, ignores context and what it takes to build a program, Wisconsin style. In the only valid way to anylise his work ,look at both records in conference, and things like margins and other analytics, and I think you will see that Doeren has done nothing but make steady and real progress. I don't have the analytics, but here's NCST under Doeren in conference:
0-8
3-5
3-5
3-5
6-2
The risk is other things like, QB play. You see a place do what Mac did, insert a true frosh QB in desperation and ride that growth. T he question, is can you keep doing it, with no more than a 1 year fall back every few years. That's a valid question here and that's a valid question at NCST.
I heard that he was a possibility but that was before the others turned them down. Knoxville is in a mess right now.
My guess is Tee Martin is offered next.
Yeah. Anyone else is gonna be a tough sell.
My guess is Tee Martin is offered next.
I saw something a few days ago that basically said the search wouldn't go further than Tee Martin or Kevin Steele. I really hope it does.
My guess is Tee Martin is offered next.
That’s a huge pressure cooker for a guy who has never been a head coach before. He’ll take it if offered, but that’s a Jon Embree hire. He’s done well as an OC (at a school where just about anybody should be successful), but being a head coach in the SEC is a huge step up. I’d want him to get some experience at a smaller school as a head coach before promoting him to HC at UT.
My guess is Tee Martin is offered next.
He's only OC by title at SC. They would essentially be hiring a WRs coach, which as you said, is basically like CU hiring Embree. I seriously can't wait to see Tee Martin as HC, Peyton Manning as OC, and Jason Witten retiring from the Cowboys to take TEs.That’s a huge pressure cooker for a guy who has never been a head coach before. He’ll take it if offered, but that’s a Jon Embree hire. He’s done well as an OC (at a school where just about anybody should be successful), but being a head coach in the SEC is a huge step up. I’d want him to get some experience at a smaller school as a head coach before promoting him to HC at UT.
I saw something a few days ago that basically said the search wouldn't go further than Tee Martin or Kevin Steele. I really hope it does.
That’s a huge pressure cooker for a guy who has never been a head coach before. He’ll take it if offered, but that’s a Jon Embree hire. He’s done well as an OC (at a school where just about anybody should be successful), but being a head coach in the SEC is a huge step up. I’d want him to get some experience at a smaller school as a head coach before promoting him to HC at UT.
Kevin Steele would be a funny hire too. Been great at Auburn, but his career is a rollercoaster as a DC. Not going to necessarily hold his head coaching tenure at Baylor against him, but not sure anyone else would seriously consider him right now. Tennessee is so ****ed.
I detect a level of sarcasm here...."But he's a Vol and one of us! You folks simply don't understand. He won't do bull**** like this trashcan thing and bring back some old traditions that asshole Butch Jones abolished as he tried to burn the program to the ground. Tee just gets it! Vol 4 Life!!!"
It is 100% an Embree situation. Eerily similar. Today, the narrative really jumped into the crazy land CU was in. Basically, "we know he's not ready for this job but he's a great guy who could be a great HC some day so maybe if we brought in a mentor as a CEO HC while Tee is the coach-in-waiting heir apparent under a set timeline, we'd get the best of all worlds and it would work."
My guess is Tee Martin is offered next.
do we need to fear herm edwards?