Official 2022 Fall Camp Thread

[BuffsRising]

Yeah, thought so as well. Poster on 247 is saying that Dorrell and Sanford are at odds with starter. If so. ****. Show

Why on earth would you think that a poster on 247 knows anything?

 

[DBT]

Sefo was effective, just got too beat up on designed runs.

Montez was mostly ineffective as a runner.

Unless you enjoy 4th and 1 situations.

 

[patebuff]

Why on earth would you think that a poster on 247 knows anything?

He is supposedly related to Shrout.

 

[LesGrossman]

He is supposedly related to Shrout.

There was a poster last year that had info on shrout that was proven out. I wonder if it’s that dude again.

Did they say which coach supports which QB? I’d assume Karl likes sticking with an incumbent + someone who doesn’t take risks (see: throw the ball) when things aren’t 100% safe and perfect to do so

 

[patebuff]

There was a poster last year that had info on shrout that was proven out. I wonder if it’s that dude again.

Did they say which coach supports which QB? I’d assume Karl likes sticking with an incumbent + someone who doesn’t take risks (see: throw the ball) when things aren’t 100% safe and perfect to do so

Karl = Lewis
Sanford = Shrout

Poster mentioned that both will play in a rotation which would be horrible. We will see if true

 

[SpacemanSpiff]

Karl = Lewis
Sanford = Shrout

Poster mentioned that both will play in a rotation which would be horrible. We will see if true

I don’t think it’s horrible for the first game. I think it will make it more obvious who the starter going forward should be. If we are still doing that in week 2, I’ll be surprised.

 

[leftybuff]

Misinformation? Standard CU dysfunction? We won't know until Friday.

 

[Duff Man]

I love having an head coach (who no one trusts to run an offense) inserting himself into the offensive decision making and gameplanning.

 

[The Alabaster Yak]

To believe that narrative you need to believe that Sanford has told Shrout that he is his guy, but Dorrell chose Lewis, and then Shrout is telling this to his friend.

 

[Duff Man]

To believe that narrative you need to believe that Sanford has told Shrout that he is his guy, but Dorrell chose Lewis, and then Shrout is telling this to his friend.

Listen, if I am going to watch ****ty football, at least let me have a healthy dose of dysfunction on the side. Don't ruin the dream.

 

[Denver_sc]

Yeah, thought so as well. Poster on 247 is saying that Dorrell and Sanford are at odds with starter. If so. ****. Show

Holy ****. Is this the norm at other programs? Coordinators always at odds with the HC on MAJOR issues?

because my experience over the last 15-20 years with CU would seem to indicate that it’s the norm with this program.

 

[SINKRATZ]

Karl = Lewis
Sanford = Shrout

Poster mentioned that both will play in a rotation which would be horrible. We will see if true

If true, I hope we see Shrout because I’m not sure Dorrell has been around a competent offense in over 15 years.

 

[FLounder]

I love having an head coach (who no one trusts to run an offense) inserting himself into the offensive decision making and gameplanning.

We could have Scott frost who refuses to insert himself.

 

[pigdog]

Last year we had a coach who refused to make a decision on anything. Fans wanted Chiv releaved of playcalling, stumbling along with poor o-line play etc.
I'm not sure he's willing or able to get into the qb situation based on lack of past chances to assert himself.

 

[Da Lama]

Dysfunction, you say? Fvck this program with a rusty spike.


Is it November yet?

 

[patebuff]

To believe that narrative you need to believe that Sanford has told Shrout that he is his guy, but Dorrell chose Lewis, and then Shrout is telling this to his friend.

After last seasons worst offense in modern history I can believe anything with this program

 

[buffaholic]

We could have Scott frost who refuses to insert himself.

Quite the opposite. Scott Frost is a control freak.

 

[buffaholic]

To believe that narrative you need to believe that Sanford has told Shrout that he is his guy, but Dorrell chose Lewis, and then Shrout is telling this to his friend.

Or that Sanford told Shrout it was close but HC believes you have to decisively win the head-to-head to take away an incumbent's job. Would be plausible that Sanford stated "that's not the way I'd do it, but HCKD believes this to be the case", but I have confidence in you and you will get a chance, I promise".

 

[The Alabaster Yak]

Or that Sanford told Shrout it was close but HC believes you have to decisively win the head-to-head to take away an incumbent's job. Would be plausible that Sanford stated "that's not the way I'd do it, but HCKD believes this to be the case", but I have confidence in you and you will get a chance, I promise".

That’s a different message than what has been alleged

 

[PAHIBuff]

Or that Sanford told Shrout it was close but HC believes you have to decisively win the head-to-head to take away an incumbent's job. Would be plausible that Sanford stated "that's not the way I'd do it, but HCKD believes this to be the case", but I have confidence in you and you will get a chance, I promise".

 

[BuffLuke80]

Smfh. Whatever man. Whoever picks up what you're going to do the best should get the damn job. It's just football, not ****ing rocket science or we'd hire Neil.

 

[Preston Slaughter]

Dorrell should poke his head back out of the qb/oc room.

 

[Bison]

If the QB derby was a dead heat, Shrout should be the guy.

 

[Go Buffs]

Dorrell should poke his head back out of the qb/oc room.

Agree

 

[Formerly_Medford]

To believe that narrative you need to believe that Sanford has told Shrout that he is his guy, but Dorrell chose Lewis, and then Shrout is telling this to his friend.

100% plausible actually

 

[The Alabaster Yak]

100% plausible actually

It’s really not, but don’t let that stop you from believing the sensational rumors

 

[Formerly_Medford]

It’s really not, but don’t let that stop you from believing the sensational rumors

Your definition of sensational comes nowhere actual sensationalism. This isn't even a hard to believe rumor.

 

[Buffalo Brad]

Yeah, thought so as well. Poster on 247 is saying that Dorrell and Sanford are at odds with starter. If so. ****. Show

You mean a bigger **** show

 

[Not Sure]

I’m at the point where I’m actually looking forward to the game just to see if we are as bad as I think we will be.

 

[Uncle Ken]

I’m calling my shot (after a few beers). We make a bowl game this year and surprise people by being competitive in all but two games.

I’m going on the “aggregation of marginal gains” theory. I think we had a number of unexpected problems last year, starting with OL coaching and lingering injuries with no depth. We had a number of starters who should not have been starting, but for no depth. Add to that, a starting RS freshman QB, with one-half game experience, operating a crappy offensive scheme behind a struggling OL. Sure we lost two good receivers, but we have really good depth there and some quality (that has to step up). We could have a good, thoughtful offensive scheme that D’s don’t know the plays before we run them, with a QB who can see routes open with a real gun (all-in on JT), that backs the D off the line a bit, opening a creatively blocked running game.

The strength of our D is up front: a solid front 7–with depth. How long since we said that?

IF the sophomores in the back can grow up quck, we have talent there. I never saw Perry as a quality S. We will have real speed at all positions in the back (the lone starter back is the slowest as far as i can tell). We just need to quickly gain experience and communicate. That CAN be done. Sure. Its a potential problem, but young speed, with a short memory, could surprise.

We should be very solid on special teams, all around.

Every year teams people think are going to be great lay an egg, and there will be a couple of teams on our schedule which will have one of those years.

I have the Kool-Aide in my veins. I call 7 wins.

Another round!!!

@Duff Man