Good to knowPlease don’t give DraftKings your sports betting money. They are awful.
Good to knowPlease don’t give DraftKings your sports betting money. They are awful.
On mobile apps, people in Colorado can legally bet with the two best American sportsbooks. DraftKings can afford to set up that shop because they’re bad for customers. Do what you want, but I don’t recomend anyone give them action.Yeah, but they made a sports book in Colorado. That's awesome.
I got Circa Colorado App. Easy.Please don’t give DraftKings your sports betting money. They are awful.
I got Circa Colorado App. Easy.
Do you have an iphone? If so, you can convert a jpeg to PDF easily.Did you have to send a scanned (not picture) copy of your drivers license? They were asking for that when I tried to sign up.
Not asked to do this. I just told them I knew Manhattan.Did you have to send a scanned (not picture) copy of your drivers license? They were asking for that when I tried to sign up.
@manhattanbuf thoughts on fanduel?
When there’s more sports, I am sure they’ll get it together. But, I will ask for you.Manhattan,
Tell Jay we are ready for App in CO.
Circa is just OK.
Waiting.
Hawg
@manhattanbuf thoughts on fanduel?
If you aren't taking advantage of the free promo money that multiple books are giving you for signing up, as an entertainment dollars gambler, you're doing it wrong.
Also, betting Bryson DeChambeau top 10s has been a very profitable way to scratch my gambling itch until more sports return.
maybe you shared it before, but I missed it -- why banned?I’m so sad that legal wagering options are proliferating in Colorado, although all but two have banned me.
Circa, Superbook, and Southpoint are the only sportsbooks in America who don’t ban winning players.maybe you shared it before, but I missed it -- why banned?
No worries for me being banned...Circa, Superbook, and Southpoint are the only sportsbooks in America who don’t ban winning players.
I didn't realize banning people for winning was a practice. It occurs to me that gamblers might effect change through PR-shaming those casinos who do: "There's no point working with MGM -- if you win they'll disengage".Circa, Superbook, and Southpoint are the only sportsbooks in America who don’t ban winning players.
I'll let someone else explain the nuances to you, but sports betting is much closer to blackjack, where players are playing "against the house," than it is to poker, where players are playing "against each other."I didn't realize banning people for winning was a practice. It occurs to me that gamblers might effect change through PR-shaming those casinos who do: "There's no point working with MGM -- if you win they'll disengage".
actually, after typing that out, I'm shocked that their competitors don't have this marketing campaign going. it seems those who don't ban winning gamblers have a HUUUGE market differentiator to exploit. Maybe those casinos that don't ban are afraid of handicapping themselves from reversing that policy when you start taking all their money.
1. There’s a difference between winning a bet or having a lucky run of winning wagers and being a winning bettor. A winning bettor exploits poor line making as a general, long term winning strategy. They refuse to bet bad lines (i.e. lines that assign a probability of a result that’s greater than the true odds). This is why I consistently encourage y’all to bet numbers and not teams. Winning players must exploit poor line making because the bookie already has the advantage of vig and a wider pool of information from a deeper grouping of clientele.I didn't realize banning people for winning was a practice. It occurs to me that gamblers might effect change through PR-shaming those casinos who do: "There's no point working with MGM -- if you win they'll disengage".
actually, after typing that out, I'm shocked that their competitors don't have this marketing campaign going. it seems those who don't ban winning gamblers have a HUUUGE market differentiator to exploit. Maybe those casinos that don't ban are afraid of handicapping themselves from reversing that policy when you start taking all their money.
I'll let someone else explain the nuances to you, but sports betting is much closer to blackjack, where players are playing "against the house," than it is to poker, where players are playing "against each other."
And yes, casinos ban blackjack players who consistently win too.
everything you both said makes sense. I was just surprised that their customers let casinos get away with the practice of banning winners.art math guy. If I were to bet on you being able to successfully implement a card counting strategy in blackjack before
They’re private establishments with significant ties to the government given the tax dollars that are paid by losing players. The casino makes much more money from losing players. What’s not to get?everything you both said makes sense. I was just surprised that their customers let casinos get away with the practice of banning winners.
Yo, can you please let us know how to take advantage of said free promo money? I want to put cash on the Nuggs to win it all.
I "get" it. my comment was that I was surprised, not that I didn't understand.They’re private establishments with significant ties to the government given the tax dollars that are paid by losing players. The casino makes much more money from losing players. What’s not to get?
You can use my account. I'll only charge a nominal fee.I’m so sad that legal wagering options are proliferating in Colorado, although all but two have banned me.
You want points?!?!? I’ll do it for just advice.You can use my account. I'll only charge a nominal fee.