Nice. Friend or a runner who you drop a few $$ on.
aTm looks good to me. I like LSU a lot, but not sure at -4. Herman is a good underdog coach.
I love A&M +19.5
Nice. Friend or a runner who you drop a few $$ on.
aTm looks good to me. I like LSU a lot, but not sure at -4. Herman is a good underdog coach.
I love A&M +19.5
Nice. Friend or a runner who you drop a few $$ on.
aTm looks good to me. I like LSU a lot, but not sure at -4. Herman is a good underdog coach.
Texas is going to beat LSU
What makes you say this.
The line has already moved to 18.5 at Circa. If it gets 16.5 offshore, Clemson will be a go.
Line down to -3.5. Money line coming into as preferred bet, not just an emotional play.
Cash those tickets.
Yes. 7.5 was a steal.I feel like I’ve already won with the current line value.
I feel like I do enough gambling on CFB to be mostly knowledgeable, but I'm not really sure what you mean by it's a preferred bet not just an emotional play?Line down to -3.5. Money line coming into as preferred bet, not just an emotional play.
Cash those tickets.
A CU fan (or a joe) taking 2.5 is an emotional bet to me, driven often by perceived biases. For many professional betters, they will pass on a 2.5 line in search of better value, or prefer to play a live dog than a short dog.I feel like I do enough gambling on CFB to be mostly knowledgeable, but I'm not really sure what you mean by it's a preferred bet not just an emotional play?
Nice. Friend or a runner who you drop a few $$ on.
aTm looks good to me. I like LSU a lot, but not sure at -4. Herman is a good underdog coach.
Who is Stanford QB? I’d lean USC, certainly if it’s not Costello.Thoughts on Stanford going to USC at a +1?
USC without Daniels?Who is Stanford QB? I’d lean USC, certainly if it’s not Costello.
I have short dogs/favs.
Who is Stanford QB? I’d lean USC, certainly if it’s not Costello.
I have short dogs/favs.
I took Stanford the minute I found out that Daniels tore his ACL. I feel really bad for the kid, but when both starting QB's go down, I would lean towards "who has the better staff to gameplan for that" and that was about the easiest answer to any question ever.Thoughts on Stanford going to USC at a +1?
I'd stay away from this one. Too many unknowns.USC without Daniels?
I took Stanford the minute I found out that Daniels tore his ACL. I feel really bad for the kid, but when both starting QB's go down, I would lean towards "who has the better staff to gameplan for that" and that was about the easiest answer to any question ever.
Probably, but this is a stay away for me. Too many unknowns. I’d take Akron before Stanford. Just me.Even with a true freshman QB in career start #1?
I like LSU a lot this week.
Couldn't disagree more, and I've got money on Tom Herman already. Can't wait for that one.
I think LSU will win. They have better athletes. I can’t lay 7 though. If the buyback hits 5, I’ll hop in. Or maybe a little ML play on LSU. This started early at Texas -1 preseason.The sharp line movement away from Texas disagrees with your assessment. The line is close enough to make UT a buy-back play, but LSU has all of the sharp money so far.
I think LSU will win. They have better athletes. I can’t lay 7 though. If the buyback hits 5, I’ll hop in. Or maybe a little ML play on LSU. This started early at Texas -1 preseason.
‘sken may be right. I don’t see it. UT depth at RB is stretched thin. Love the moxie of Texas QB, but if he tries to take on too much of the run burden, he could get rung up by those LSU missiles.