BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
Hey rayplor bears, that's called a fake field goal.
I don't think they do those in the bigtex conference.
I don't think they do those in the bigtex conference.
Dude, the duck ****s were miserable pricks in Tempe on January 1, 2002. They’ve been insufferable for at least 20 years.
Couldn't possibly be because CU fans were terrific assholes for the weeks leading up to the game and then got their asses kicked, could it?
We're all the ****ing same, the only difference is that Oregon wins more than most.
Take the ducks, subtract Phil Knights money, and you have something between the Beavers and the Zona schools. Oregon likes to act like they are some kind of blueblood but they always manage to win enough to feed their fans fantasies but lose the big games to prove they aren't.Couldn't possibly be because CU fans were terrific assholes for the weeks leading up to the game and then got their asses kicked, could it?
We're all the ****ing same, the only difference is that Oregon wins more than most.
Lol, except defense matters and takeaways are a result of good defense.Wisconsin could have easily won 42-14 tonight.
**** Bailer.
That is my commentary on tonight's games.
Weird take on the first one. Concur on the second.Wisconsin could have easily won 42-14 tonight.
**** Bailer.
That is my commentary on tonight's games.
Sure, but Wisconsin had 4 turnovers and still only lost by one. Oregon D was solid, but one turnover was a punter dropping the snap that was returned for a TD. They also had drive killing penalties that cost them points. Point is, had they played a relatively clean game, they win going away.Lol, except defense matters and takeaways are a result of good defense.
Fun game; good PAC outcome,, but the football itself was an eyesore. UO had NO "O" to speak of after that first drive and if it wasn't for Wiscy TOs the game would have been a Badger rout.What a great rose bowl
Hey! It went real well with that hideous haircut!Wtf is matt rhule wearing? A smock with a hood?
Take the ducks, subtract Phil Knights money, and you have something between the Beavers and the Zona schools. Oregon likes to act like they are some kind of blueblood but they always manage to win enough to feed their fans fantasies but lose the big games to prove they aren't.
As soon as you admit Oregon would still be a back water no where without Uncle Phil’s benevolence.At what point do we move beyond this johnny come lately sour grapes bull****?
But they didn't.Sure, but Wisconsin had 4 turnovers and still only lost by one. Oregon D was solid, but one turnover was a punter dropping the snap that was returned for a TD. They also had drive killing penalties that cost them points. Point is, had they played a relatively clean game, they win going away.
So Wisconsin is undisciplined and doesn't take care of the ball. Got it.Sure, but Wisconsin had 4 turnovers and still only lost by one. Oregon D was solid, but one turnover was a punter dropping the snap that was returned for a TD. They also had drive killing penalties that cost them points. Point is, had they played a relatively clean game, they win going away.
I think that last game against OSU was pretty telling for where Clemson's offensive line is as the moment. Now does LSU have the same talent up front as OSU? Probably not but still I think they can exploit that and allow for LSU to pull away at some point.LSU has beaten 5 of the Top 10 teams this season in the last AP pole:
Oklahoma
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Alabama
Of course Clemson can beat LSU, but I do not see it happening.
That O line was the heart of the Georgia team too.ESPN said Georgia was down about a dozen regulars, including three starting OL. Some hurt, others preserving health for the upcoming draft. Still beat ****ler by a dozen. That is some quality depth.
I generally agree but I do think there is a difference when a team has unforced errors that change the game. Yes, if you are beating the crap out of someone on defense and they start throwing pics and fumbling the ball then there is a correlation there. When Laviska Shenault is running a kickoff back against Nebraska and a player gets him from behind while hs is looking to his left for tacklers and he fumbles that is more about luck.The “if they hadn’t turned the ball over, they would have won” argument never fails to amaze me. It’s so ****er-like. How many times has surveyor said “if they didn’t turn the ball over, the ****ers would have won easily”? It’s like saying “if they had only scored more points, they would have won”. Turnovers are a huge part of the game. News flash: CU turned the ball over a bunch against UO, too. If we hadn’t, the game would have been a lot closer.
But they didn't.
There are no worse takes than the "well if this team didn't step on their own dick so many times, they would have won the game easily!" That **** is Nub logic.
Turnovers are part of the game, no doubt. The difference here is that usually when a team is a -3 in turnover differential it's a blowout the other way. Wisconsin thoroughly dominated Oregon and lost by one despite all the turnovers and untimely penalties. I get it. Blaming turnovers and penalties is like blaming officials. The point of my post was that Wisconsin is/was the superior team but made too many mistakes yesterday and couldn't overcome the last one.The “if they hadn’t turned the ball over, they would have won” argument never fails to amaze me. It’s so ****er-like. How many times has surveyor said “if they didn’t turn the ball over, the ****ers would have won easily”? It’s like saying “if they had only scored more points, they would have won”. Turnovers are a huge part of the game. News flash: CU turned the ball over a bunch against UO, too. If we hadn’t, the game would have been a lot closer.
I agree that Wisonsin turned the ball over more and took more penalties while losing the game, but I'm still lost on how that translates to them being the better team.Turnovers are part of the game, no doubt. The difference here is that usually when a team is a -3 in turnover differential it's a blowout the other way. Wisconsin thoroughly dominated Oregon and lost by one despite all the turnovers and untimely penalties. I get it. Blaming turnovers and penalties is like blaming officials. The point of my post was that Wisconsin is/was the superior team but made too many mistakes yesterday and couldn't overcome the last one.
I could go with that list. I would put a couple of schools ahead of Notre Dame as first out.My top ten:
1. LSU
2. Clemson
3. Ohio St
4. UGA
5. Oregon
6. Bama
7. Wisconsin
8. Florida
9. Minnesota
10. PSU (slightly over ND)
No OU, no Baylor.