somebody
Well-Known Member
Now I feel bad.
You mean you feel like an asshole.
Now I feel bad.
Yeah. My name is DBT and I'm an asshole.You mean you feel like an asshole.
I'm pretty sure "the entire bowl" is not "original construction." At one point there was a track around the football field; then in the 60s? 70s? they "lowered the field" and installed both the big "Colorado" at the south end of the field and the now current bottom x rows of seating.Its a good idea, but would cost way more than it is worth. To give the kind of clearance you are asking for would be a huge demo project of probably 8-10 rows per side, and while taking those out you would have to brace the entire bowl of the stadium temporarily while you take out the bottom wall. The entire bowl, being original construction, is on grade. I would bet they would end up tearing out a lot of the stadium in order to accomplish what you are asking for and do it safely.
Wow thanks for that warm welcome everyone :wow: They always tell you that the first time is awkward and uncomfortable but you will remember it forever. So wise so true.
I had read about the lowering the field and adding rows when they got rid of the track, so I was just curious to see if anyone had heard of them exploring reversing that to some degree. It wouldn't have to be much because I also love how intimate Folsom is, but I would think that at some point some NCAA person is going to come up with a regulation for player safety that is going to force them to do something about it.
I also thought that doing it and then renovating the west side, including Balch, would be a good idea because they could add a second level on that side to make up for the lost seating along with any plans for new suites, etc.
I'm pretty sure "the entire bowl" is not "original construction." At one point there was a track around the football field; then in the 60s? 70s? they "lowered the field" and installed both the big "Colorado" at the south end of the field and the now current bottom x rows of seating.
Depending on how many rows that "x" is above and how it was constructed, the possibilities range from "easily feasible / relatively inexpensive" to "engineering nightmare / outrageously expensive."
Its a good idea, but would cost way more than it is worth. To give the kind of clearance you are asking for would be a huge demo project of probably 8-10 rows per side, and while taking those out you would have to brace the entire bowl of the stadium temporarily while you take out the bottom wall. The entire bowl, being original construction, is on grade. I would bet they would end up tearing out a lot of the stadium in order to accomplish what you are asking for and do it safely.
As excited as I am about what's going on now, I'm more curious about what they'll eventually do on the West side. Will they put in another "Champions club" to mirror what they are putting in now? What will they do with the Flatirons Club/Press Box? It's a unique characteristic in Folsom, but it's very limiting. How will they renovate Balch? Will they incorporate Balch and Carlson somehow to provide for another iconic entrance to the stadium complex? Will there be a second deck placed on the West side?
I just hope I live long enough to see it. I'm guessing we're still looking at another 20+ years before that stuff gets done. I hope I'm wrong on that, though. If they could pull that off in 5-10 years, I'd be thrilled.
Carlson is rumored to be a new academic building. It is one of only a few buildings on campus that could house a 200 person auditorium. I have see plans for Balch that call for it to be raised and a new 2 tier building on that side.
As excited as I am about what's going on now, I'm more curious about what they'll eventually do on the West side. Will they put in another "Champions club" to mirror what they are putting in now? What will they do with the Flatirons Club/Press Box? It's a unique characteristic in Folsom, but it's very limiting. How will they renovate Balch? Will they incorporate Balch and Carlson somehow to provide for another iconic entrance to the stadium complex? Will there be a second deck placed on the West side?
I just hope I live long enough to see it. I'm guessing we're still looking at another 20+ years before that stuff gets done. I hope I'm wrong on that, though. If they could pull that off in 5-10 years, I'd be thrilled.
Here's the old footprint:
Here's the old footprint:
Man, the students really let the team down that day, huh?
Wow. You are a pussy.
Yes, I know Carlson is scheduled for a substantial renovation. I have said this a lot, but I don't see why it can't be incorporated into the stadium complex itself. The entrance to Carlson is iconic. I think it would be fantastic to use that as an entrance to the stadium.
just a guess but i think RG will plan some additional foam dome upgrades before west side, probably more manageable fiscally and time-line wise. still hope he gets a new sound system and some new paint and signage into folsom quick though.
To the bolded, because it will be classrooms. The only thing connecting it to the stadium at that point will be location.
Those two are not mutually exclusive. What does the fact that it'll be academic space have to do with it's ability to be used as part of the stadium complex?
Man, the students really let the team down that day, huh?
It will have to be open and usable by students on game days, which would not be possible if it was a ticketed entrance. Also I think their plan to put a 200person lecture hall in there will take up enough space that it will not be connected to the stadium complex anymore.
No it won't. I don't get this. There are a grand total of six Saturdays in the whole entire year that would impact the usage of that facility. What would be wrong with tying the Carlson facility into a newly renovated Balch and having people enter through the grand entrance at Carlson? Use the classroom space for game-day activities. It's six days a year. The school needs to learn to leverage it's assets a little better. We have an opportunity here to do something truly special. I'm concerned that we will let the opportunity pass us by.
Here's the old footprint:
A little random timing for this post, but I just finally decided to join the action. With all the talk about the need to renovate Balch as the next big thing on RG's to do list, I was wondering why it seems nobody brings up how narrow our sidelines are. I would think that knocking out the first few rows on the east and west sidelines to create more room would be a priority because of the safety issue that the current setup brings. I cringe every time a player heads for the sidelines on a play because I know they are about to take a shin or side or head to the benches that are mounted to the wall. Anybody know if that kind of thing is even remotely on anyone's radar?
At VT, we expanded the side lines and put down a firm surface at request of the networks because the previous configuration didn't allow full mobility of the sideline camera-boom-mobile (I'm sure there's a different name for that). They suggested we be on TV more if we did. I haven't taken note if the sidelines at Folsom allow for that, or if new technology has made the sideline width/surface issue moot.