Except for Nebraska. They're ****ing awesome!I was just going to post this.
You are what your record says you are.
Except for Nebraska. They're ****ing awesome!I was just going to post this.
You are what your record says you are.
Fine, whatever. I think Cal is better than their record. We'll find out how they stack up Saturday. Better O, but worse D than CU, statistically. I highly doubt CU stays within 7 of Oregon, but again, we'll see.I was just going to post this.
You are what your record says you are.
Cal's a bad team that's consistently competitive in its games.
Thow more to the backs out of the backfield. CU need to pass to setup the run. Also need to go no hurdle, play faster.
Fine, whatever. I think Cal is better than their record. We'll find out how they stack up Saturday. Better O, but worse D than CU, statistically. I highly doubt CU stays within 7 of Oregon, but again, we'll see.
Or the Michigan effect if we're speaking Fusker-ese-but yeah.The “Texas A&M effect”?
A little annoying that Shenault is still being held out. Guess that's what you get when the emphasis is place on teaching and raising men rather than winning.
Sorry, but college football is big business and college players are now able to make money off their NIL. The priority is not on teaching and raising men. These players are adults and the coaches are not their fathers.The priority should be teaching and raising men. Hopefully Shenault can turn things around. He is running out of chances.
This. The kid gloves are off now. It’s a business. We don’t have to like it (I don’t), but we better get used to it, and fast.Sorry, but college football is big business and college players are now able to make money off their NIL. The priority is not on teaching and raising men. These players are adults and the coaches are not their fathers.
Cool story, bro. If this was D3.The priority should be teaching and raising men. Hopefully Shenault can turn things around. He is running out of chances.
Being the leadership figure (setting expectations, holding members responsible for missing practice, messing around, etc.)
Sorry, but college football is big business and college players are now able to make money off their NIL. The priority is not on teaching and raising men. These players are adults and the coaches are not their fathers.
No, but as a father who went through it, I heard a lot of "we will provide the guidance, structure and resources for our young men to be successful, how they choose to use those things to excel on and off the field will be their responsibility." I heard A LOT more of, "Here's how and why we're are winning/are going to be winning."The question I need to ask you is When these players were been recruited and the coach went to talk to the parents of the players. Did the coach tell the paretns I am not his father, College football is big business. I will not teach him anything?
Have we calculated Frost's record in the proper format? You know-wins, losses, and moral victories?Except for ****braska. They're ****ing awesome!
No coach is saying they won’t provide guidance or be there for support, but that is not the priority and any family who thinks it is or should be isn’t living in reality.As a parent would you send your child to a school if the Coach tells you he will not teach a student athlete life lessons?
I am a CU alumni, if KD said something like that. My kid will not attend CU.
Okay one quick thing before I respond to this-I expect this program to be in bowls most years, with the occasional really special year.......along the lines of 2001 or 2016. It is not that damn hard to win at the level I talked about in the last sentence while still doing things the right way-but CU has made it next to impossible over the last 15 years.Sorry, but college football is big business and college players are now able to make money off their NIL. The priority is not on teaching and raising men. These players are adults and the coaches are not their fathers.
FIFYNo coach is saying they won’t provide guidance or be there for support, but that is not the priority and any family who thinks it is or should be isn’t living in reality.
These kids are getting a free college degree and can now capitalize further monetarily, some in the 6 and 7 figure range, and transfer anywhere they want without penalty.
Coaches are recruiting these kids to win football games, not to be their father figures away from home. If that’s part of the recruiting sales pitch then so be it, but it is not a priority, nor should it be.
It’s division one football. It ain’t Intramurals!
Here's the other thing to keep in mind, the HC at any program is spending almost zero one on one time with individual players. It's just not how it works. The majority of player interaction is with position coaches (60%) and even Grad Assistants (40%) who are typically only 4-5 years older than the players themselves.As a parent would you send your child to a school if the Coach tells you he will not teach a student athlete life lessons?
I am a CU alumni, if KD said something like that. My kid will not attend CU.
If you recruit well consistently, you can afford to take some hard line stances on good players who break the rules, and still win 6-7 games/year. When you're recruiting sucks and you are averaging 8-10 ppg from your offense it makes it hard to self impose a half season suspension for one of your top playmakers and still expect to score points and win.Okay one quick thing before I respond to this-I expect this program to be in bowls most years, with the occasional really special year.......along the lines of 2001 or 2016. It is not that damn hard to win at the level I talked about in the last sentence while still doing things the right way-but CU has made it next to impossible over the last 15 years.
A coach can do both. Can win and teach life lessens. How does it help the program long term if a WR is not properly suspened for violationg team rules? He is also a repeat offender. lack of discipline will lead to more indiscipline.
How does it help the program if a very talented WR is actually on the field making plays instead of sitting out half the season for violating team rules? The answer seems obvious to me.A coach can do both. Can win an teach life lessens. How does it help the program long term if a WR is not properly suspened for violationg team rules.
How does it help the program if a very talented WR is actually on the field making plays instead of sitting out half the season for violating team rules? The answer seems obvious to me.
Cal has one win on the season, against D2 Sacramento State by the score of 42-30 or 12 points. Sacramento State lost to Northern Iowa 34-16 or 18 points. By your logic, Oregon would only beat Northern Iowa by one point. It's too bad UO and UNI don't play each other this season cuz I would make a bundle on that game.
I'm sure parents like KD, but the parents of top recruits don't like him more than they like their son playing for a coach who will prep them for the NFL.Sure, but a pitch that focus mostly on football been big business won't work for me. The pitch about been a father figure maybe self serving but it is mandatory for me. Will then do my research to see if practice what they preach. From what i am hearing. Parents like KD. He looks like a steady father figure.