Yeah but what if you paid Kiszla tens, or even dozens of dollars?No, not every publication and talking head knows who has legitimate interest in jobs. Not even close actually.
Yeah but what if you paid Kiszla tens, or even dozens of dollars?No, not every publication and talking head knows who has legitimate interest in jobs. Not even close actually.
Except that most coaches don't want to speak directly until the process is pretty far along. First, gauge and confirm interest through agent. Next, get aligned on the main questions/concerns/demands so that it all basically works.The people doing the hiring should keep Russell Wilson in mind.
Often, a sportsperson is a 'superstar', because of many factors, not just their innate abilities.
I'm for not breaking the bank on a hire.
Of course, in football you are as much concerned with a coach's image and appeal to recruits, as with his ability.
The idea of sepending 100s of $1000s on a "search team" is absurd. Every college football publication and talking head, knows who is available, what they'd bring to the table and if they'd want to come here.
All parties want plausible deniability from a third party match maker.
But sobbing the exact right amount, right?Yanking too hard.
Sort of like FarmersOnly.com?All parties want plausible deniability through a third party match maker.
The only time you don't need a firm is if you're set on an internal hire. Even then, it's questionable. Did Notre Dame make the best possible hire from among the pool of candidates who would have wanted that job - if ND was looking for the guy who fit its culture and gave it the most likely path to a national championship? I don't believe so.Ding ding ding
Especially in the age of social media, ANY contact about a job opening can be really detrimental for all parties.
I guess I do not see all the hubbub about canning RG and hiring an AD and FB coach at the same time. GT did it. They jettisoned Geoff Collins and their AD on 9/26 and had a new AD by 10/14. BTW, the AD reports directly to the President. If Saliman did that, he could let Dr. Phil float in the bowl as long as Dr. Phil wanted.The only time you don't need a firm is if you're set on an internal hire. Even then, it's questionable. Did Notre Dame make the best possible hire from among the pool of candidates who would have wanted that job - if ND was looking for the guy who fit its culture and gave it the most likely path to a national championship? I don't believe so.
If we are to believe the rumors that RG may be looking for employment elsewhere, it would make some financial sense to allow him to go on his own and maybe receive a contract buyout than it would be to fire him and pay out his contract. The timing is not ideal, but there is some logic to it when viewed in that light.I guess I do not see all the hubbub about canning RG and hiring an AD and FB coach at the same time. GT did it. They jettisoned Geoff Collins and their AD on 9/26 and had a new AD by 10/14. BTW, the AD reports directly to the President. If Saliman did that, he could let Dr. Phil float in the bowl as long as Dr. Phil wanted.
What is the problem, other than CU continues its incompetent ways?
If we are to believe the rumors that RG may be looking for employment elsewhere, it would make some financial sense to allow him to go on his own and maybe receive a contract buyout than it would be to fire him and pay out his contract. The timing is not ideal, but there is some logic to it when viewed in that light.
The AD reports directly to the ChancellorI guess I do not see all the hubbub about canning RG and hiring an AD and FB coach at the same time. GT did it. They jettisoned Geoff Collins and their AD on 9/26 and had a new AD by 10/14. BTW, the AD reports directly to the President. If Saliman did that, he could let Dr. Phil float in the bowl as long as Dr. Phil wanted.
What is the problem, other than CU continues its incompetent ways?
I think Marshall might argue that it was the best possible hire for ND.The only time you don't need a firm is if you're set on an internal hire. Even then, it's questionable. Did Notre Dame make the best possible hire from among the pool of candidates who would have wanted that job - if ND was looking for the guy who fit its culture and gave it the most likely path to a national championship? I don't believe so.
"If Saliman did that...". Yeah, I know. I was talking about GT.The AD reports directly to the Chancellor
Don’t be too harsh. Pate’s portrait says a lot."If Saliman did that...". Yeah, I know. I was talking about GT.
Details here, but the short version is:Why wouldn't RG take his PERA retirement and go home?
I’ve suddenly been overcome with a fear of impending doom. Maybe it’s because I’m beginning to get antsy. My fear is that RG will announce a really underwhelming hire.
We all know this is your backgroundDon’t be too harsh. Pate’s portrait says a lot.
WhatWilner's lost his ****ing mind... suggesting CU should go after Klauton twitter DM Adams
Something happen with auto-correct? I don't know what this means.Wilner's lost his ****ing mind... suggesting CU should go after Klauton twitter DM Adams
What
Oh I think I’ve solved it: Klayton “Twitter DM” Adams.I think I need to start drinking to understand that post.
Mods: Can we have a handle change to BCSWordle?Oh I think I’ve solved it: Klayton “Twitter DM” Adams.
Maybe some more context, bcs. For HC? That can’t be a serious suggestion from Wilner.
Oh I think I’ve solved it: Klayton “Twitter DM” Adams
What the ****... when you posted this, I asked myself "as OC? He seems a little underqualified" and then the suggestion is actually that CU should go after him as HC?! LOLWilner's lost his ****ing mind... suggesting CU should go after Klayton Adams