CFB as we know it is constantly evolving. I’d argue that ever since the advent of conference championship games, the game itself was sent in a direction that got us to where we are today.CFB as we know it is over.
CFB as we know it is constantly evolving. I’d argue that ever since the advent of conference championship games, the game itself was sent in a direction that got us to where we are today.CFB as we know it is over.
FIFYCFB as we know it is constantly evolving. I’d argue that ever since the advent of ESPN & Nike equipment deals, the game itself was sent in a direction that got us to where we are today.
They don’t even need to. The first time texas pulls a texas the rest of the room will be like…..I am amused that one of the first things a SEC AD brings up is how UT won’t be the big dog. Believe me, you may think that, but UT doesn’t.
this is going to make for fantastic theater.
Yeah, good luck with that. Ask Nebraska how well that works.I am amused that one of the first things a SEC AD brings up is how UT won’t be the big dog. Believe me, you may think that, but UT doesn’t.
this is going to make for fantastic theater.
Bye byeSo, what happens with the Longhorn Network?
Good Lord, please let what happened to Nebraska happen to UT. It would be glorious.Yeah, good luck with that. Ask ****braska how well that works.
So, what happens with the Longhorn Network?
Ego. The Big XII is beneath them, they deserve to be with Bama/ LSU/ Florida etc. And the disparity between how ESPN treated talks of early renegotiation of the media deals with the Big XII and SEC this past year took it to 11 for them.Good Lord, please let what happened to ****braska happen to UT. It would be glorious.
I’m wondering why the one school in the country that has nearly zero financial constraints would be looking to make this move. The only thing I can think of is that they truly believe the B12 is a dying conference and they want to put the final nail in the coffin.
They saw what happened with aTm's recruiting and fund raising following their move to the SEC. Combine that with the additional money from the conference, and the looming NIL changes, and their assertiveness to make this move now makes perfect sense to me.Good Lord, please let what happened to ****braska happen to UT. It would be glorious.
I’m wondering why the one school in the country that has nearly zero financial constraints would be looking to make this move. The only thing I can think of is that they truly believe the B12 is a dying conference and they want to put the final nail in the coffin.
Good Lord, please let what happened to ****braska happen to UT. It would be glorious.
I’m wondering why the one school in the country that has nearly zero financial constraints would be looking to make this move. The only thing I can think of is that they truly believe the B12 is a dying conference and they want to put the final nail in the coffin.
I listened to Landry this morning. Espn has already told texas that the longhorn network is not going to be renewed. The networks also came to the big 12 and said there isn’t room for them to increase their revenues for the next agreement so they would probably get lapped by the pac 12 and maybe even the ACC. Texas then realized them and Oklahoma were carrying the league by themselves and had to leave (that’s why so many big 12 insiders said them leaving was inevitable). Them going to the SEC instead of another conference is an overinflated ego that they can beat anyone and trying to stick it to A&M on the recruiting trail, imo.I get why people think Texas will destroy that conference, but Texas really does not understand the room they are walking into.
The money matters (obviously), but I am still scratching my head on this move from the Texas POV.
I listened to Landry this morning. Espn has already told texas that the longhorn network is not going to be renewed. The networks also came to the big 10 and said there isn’t room for them to increase their revenues for the next agreement so they would probably get lapped by the pac 12 and maybe even the ACC. Texas then realized them and Oklahoma were carrying the league by themselves and had to leave (that’s why so many big 12 insiders said them leaving was inevitable). Them going to the SEC instead of another conference is an overinflated ego that they can beat anyone and trying to stick it to A&M on the recruiting trail, imo.
Thank the good lord above that Larry Scott is gone.So I would guess the Pac-12 announces four new members by end of next week.
I hope not. New commish needs to do a really deep dive into houston, baylor, TCU, TTU, SMU, OSU and maybe even BYU. TCU seems like a lock, atleast to me. Houston and SMU have the most long term upward mobility. That fourth school is a tough one though.So I would guess the Pac-12 announces four new members by end of next week.
Typo, the big 12. Fixed nowThe P12 overtaking the B1G? Interesting.
But does this move really accomplish that? I’m not convinced. Conference distributions are not the sole source of revenue for an athletic department.Because they want to ensure it stays that way.
I actually think texas was getting really concerned with the SEC raiding texas In recruiting and that sort of pissed them off along with knowing the longhorn network wasn’t going to be around after the expiration of the contract. OU went along for sure though.But does this move really accomplish that? I’m not convinced. Conference distributions are not the sole source of revenue for an athletic department.
From a competitive standpoint, this move makes no sense at all to me. It makes sense for OU, though.
Anybody think that this might be driven by OU and not UT?
But does this move really accomplish that? I’m not convinced. Conference distributions are not the sole source of revenue for an athletic department.
From a competitive standpoint, this move makes no sense at all to me. It makes sense for OU, though.
Anybody think that this might be driven by OU and not UT?
Not sure how legit this guy is
Disagree. The best players and the best coaches want to play the best competition. Texass was seeing that the state which they historically controlled, was now being looted on the daily by the SEC. They view themselves as a top 3 program in the country, and they wanted to ensure that they maintained a competitive advantage in trying to secure that position. OU followed along because why in the hell would they want to stay in the Big 12 without Texass?But does this move really accomplish that? I’m not convinced. Conference distributions are not the sole source of revenue for an athletic department.
From a competitive standpoint, this move makes no sense at all to me. It makes sense for OU, though.
Anybody think that this might be driven by OU and not UT?