Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official realignment thread - SEC formally invites OU and Texas to join the conference in 2025

hokiehead said:
I'll also re-iterate that I think the best move for the ACC is convince Notre Dame and Penn State to join together as full members
Click to expand...

That would be funny since Maryland would be banging on the ACC door to let them back in.

I don't doubt what that VT board poster is saying about CU & some P12 schools going to the B1G. It's pretty easy to come to those conclusions. Any word of CU to the SEC since if OU is added, CU technically would border a SEC state making CU technically eligible for the SEC? I think VT would be a good fit in the SEC.
 
patebuff said:
Interesting.

I think that ****braska game in 2019 was a massive awakening for the CU admin. That game was an absolute financial bonanza for the AD and School. Getting that game every other year would be massive along with how well the BIG travels, it makes sense.

I've wanted CU to the BIG for the last few years but if they were to pull this off, I think that would crush how big of a move this would be compared to the move to the Pac.
Click to expand...

I think everything is largely irrelevant unless or until CU commits to its football program.
 
Jalapeno said:
That would be funny since Maryland would be banging on the ACC door to let them back in.

I don't doubt what that VT board poster is saying about CU & some P12 schools going to the B1G. It's pretty easy to come to those conclusions. Any word of CU to the SEC since if OU is added, CU technically would border a SEC state making CU technically eligible for the SEC? I think VT would be a good fit in the SEC.
Click to expand...
I only want to see VT to the SEC if the ACC collapses. if the ACC survives, it should remain Tech's home.

but a VT/Tenn conference rivalry could be great.
 
Bill Cody said:
MSU cares about winning, like most schools in the B1G. That's my only point. The money would be nice, sure, but would you honestly expect CU to start behaving in a way that would allow us to be competitive in the B1G?
Click to expand...

I would expect that there would be an increase in money spent by the AD commensurate with the increased payout from the conference.
 
buff4bcs1985 said:
Honestly if Texas and OU do this... football is irrelevant west of Austin
Click to expand...

I think an argument can be made it already is.

As I said previously, I think the lack of importance of college football on the West Coast (compared to the Southeast and the Midwest) is a major problem for the P12.
 
ahoelsken said:
Who gives a **** about little brother?

CU's gotta find a way into the Big 10, and frankly-I think CU might be the B1G's only expansion option. I can't see them poaching anybody from the ACC-doesn't their grant of rights make it hard for any of their membership to leave?
Click to expand...
Aside from the comic relief, nobody.
 
I really don’t want to be part of the B1G unless it’s part of a combined super conference with the PAC.

If I squint really hard, I can envision a 32 team super conference that includes all current B1G and PAC teams plus OSU, KU, ISU, Tech, TCU and Baylor. I just threw up in my mouth - but for ****s sake, they just won the hoops national championship. Cheating assholes or not, that can’t be ignored. Divide it into four 8-team sub-conferences and run a playoff every year, with the championship held at the Rose Bowl. Winner advances to play the winner of the SEC/ACC super conference championship.
 
BuffsNYC said:
I would expect that there would be an increase in money spent by the AD commensurate with the increased payout from the conference.
Click to expand...

But would there be an increase in money spent compared to the rest of the college game or the conference peers?
 
Texas being accused of damaging CFB and fellow conference mates...who could have predicted that. It truly is amazing that there is never enough for them despite being the richest school in college athletics.

We are really seeing how the lack of sport commissioner and everyone acting for their own short term interests really is bad for the sport. If there is a breakaway maybe eventually we get a commissioner since that league will look a lot more like a professional model.
 
Jens1893 said:
Whereas CU .... ?
Click to expand...

Fair point and I have that same frustration regarding CU's football program, as many others on this board do too. But CU has done some excellent recent facilities upgrades and at least we were relevant on the national stage for over a decade even if that is 20 years ago at this point. KU is 100% a basketball school and always will be. In general CU football just has a much better perception than the wasteland known as KU football. And I know these expansions won't be nearly as market driven as the last round was but you also can't ignore the possibility of the B1G getting full control of the Denver TV market in the P5 landscape, whereas the KC market is broken up between the Big XII, B1G and SEC.
 
SuperD said:
Texas being accused of damaging CFB and fellow conference mates...who could have predicted that. It truly is amazing that there is never enough for them despite being the richest school in college athletics.

We are really seeing how the lack of sport commissioner and everyone acting for their own short term interests really is bad for the sport. If there is a breakaway maybe eventually we get a commissioner since that league will look a lot more like a professional model.
Click to expand...
Which is why I’d love to see this happen. They would have outright killed two conferences and would be working on a third. Don’t anybody try to tell me their act would be kept in check in the SEC. They don’t accept being held in check. UT is like a virus. It eats away at the host until there’s nothing left but a carcass, and then they move on to the next victim.
 
Jens1893 said:
But would there be an increase in money spent compared to the rest of the college game or the conference peers?
Click to expand...
Obviously not conference peers, but we would outspend anyone outside of the SEC, B10, and a few other outliers like ND and Oregon.
 
Not Sure said:
Which is why I’d love to see this happen. They would have outright killed two conferences and would be working on a third. Don’t anybody try to tell me their act would be kept in check in the SEC. They don’t accept being held in check. UT is like a virus. It eats away at the host until there’s nothing left but a carcass, and then they move on to the next victim.
Click to expand...
1627052083516.gif
 
Not Sure said:
Which is why I’d love to see this happen. They would have outright killed two conferences and would be working on a third. Don’t anybody try to tell me their act would be kept in check in the SEC. They don’t accept being held in check. UT is like a virus. It eats away at the host until there’s nothing left but a carcass, and then they move on to the next victim.
Click to expand...
If it happens again there will be nothing left of college football
 
Not Sure said:
Which is why I’d love to see this happen. They would have outright killed two conferences and would be working on a third. Don’t anybody try to tell me their act would be kept in check in the SEC. They don’t accept being held in check. UT is like a virus. It eats away at the host until there’s nothing left but a carcass, and then they move on to the next victim.
Click to expand...
Bama, LSU, Arky. That is some powerful medicine. UT will still be UT, but finally they will have a group of schools who have the $$$ and power to tell them to eff off....and make it stick.
 
1627052395847.png1627052437780.png

CU spends more per sport than Nebraska does. Feel free to look at the link below and make comparisons with the other B1G members.

Football Bowl Subdivision | College Athletics Database

NCAA Division I is subdivided according to a school's level of football classification or sponsorship. Previously known as NCAA Division I-A, the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) is the classification for Division I athletic programs with the highest-profile football competition in college athletics.
cafidatabase.knightcommission.org cafidatabase.knightcommission.org
 
are football fans in the state of Texas more into NFL or college? Most of the US, it seems very clear where interests reside, but w/ Texas, I genuinely don't know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top