As California slowly falls behind on the football recruit production, you're probably right about Texas. That adding Tx schools is IF and only IF we are able to realistically pick up a significant chunk of recruits.
The challenge in these times is that now that ALL of the SEC programs will be shopping in Texas weekly with high visibility they will be sopping up more recruits than they used to. Were likely fighting for the leftovers with those leftovers. So is it worth it to divide by 16 or 14 (TCU, TT, UH, X) instead of 12? My point is the conference might only get a marginal number of additional recruits relative to what we are paying to be there. Texas philosophically aligns better with the SEC than it does with the more liberal west which might contribute to a recruits decision. I think, as others have noted, it's the NFL potential and coach/recruiters that have the most impact on a commits decision.
Anyway, you can see why all these schools that have geographic proximity want into the SEC.
State | FBS Signees | Players | Ratio |
---|
1. Florida | 389 | 40,606 | 1 in 104 |
2. Georgia | 248 | 32,979 | 1 in 133 |
3. Louisiana | 132 | 20,087 | 1 in 152 |
4. Hawaii | 22 | 4,258 | 1 in 194 |
5. Utah | 35 | 8,638 | 1 in 247 |
6. Alabama | 89 | 22,841 | 1 in 257 |
7. Mississippi | 83 | 22,300 | 1 in 269 |
8. Maryland/D.C. | 55 | 15,662 | 1 in 285 |
9. Ohio | 135 | 44,431 | 1 in 329 |
1o. Tennessee | 67 | 23,003 | 1 in 343 |
11. California | 289 | 103,474 | 1 in 358 |
12. Texas | 459 | 164,554 | 1 in 359 |
(click me)
View attachment 45819