Part of the problem is that recruiting rankings really didn't become what it is until the early 2000s. You basically had a magazine or two that dedicated a page with a list of maybe the Top 50 HS players for the upcoming year ala Phil Steele. I do know that guys like Billups, Pelle, Morandais, Roby, Harrison, Winston, Copeland, Walls, etc. were on those lists. Who knows what they'd be ranked now? I imagine anywhere in the 100-200 range with Billups and Harrison in the top 25.
Michel is an outlier here. As an international recruit, I would assume he was an under-the radar-guy, not on any major lists. Copeland, as well, may have been a strong regional recruit (VA), but I don't think he was a national-level, top-150 guy.
Billups, Harrison, Pelle are all known top-tier recruits. I would envision Roby as like a top-75 in the modern landscape? Winston is also known as a top-50. I cannot speak to others.
What I get when reading through the offer and considering lists of the guys from the early-rivals era, CU is often the lone power conference program approaching a lot of these guys. Roby is the exception.
One thing I really appreciated with RP was his ability to find impactful players in odd areas. Maybe not guys who were highly rated, but guys who fit a role. We signed kids from 23 different states and 5 foreign countries during his tenure.
When I spoke with Neill Woelk for my 60-59 article a few years back, he emphasized that, saying: "“He beat the bushes and found good players. [...] I think he was a very good talent evaluator. And, if he identified a need, i.e, a Jose Winston as a PG or a David Harrison as a big man, he went after them. He was a very dogged recruiter and would work his tail off to get kids. He identified talent, looked for needs. But he didn’t have a specific place that he went after kids; I mean he wasn’t hot after kids in Texas or California or anything like that. I think he just identified kids that he thought would fit the program and then went after them."