What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Other games weekend of 9-21/9-23

Pac-12 champ would likely need to go undefeated. But let's say there are three remaining spots for a one-loss Big 12 champ, a one-loss Big Ten champ, a one-loss Clemson, and a one-loss Bama... you cannot tell me Bama is a lock in that scenario. They would be sweating it out.
Only Pac-12 team that can get in with a loss, I think, is USC. Non-conference schedule of Western Michigan, Texas and Notre Dame is no joke.
 
UMass within 4 (17-13) early in the 4th quarter at Tennessee. 1st down at their own 20.
 
Pac-12 champ would likely need to go undefeated. But let's say there are three remaining spots for a one-loss Big 12 champ, a one-loss Big Ten champ, a one-loss Clemson, and a one-loss Bama... you cannot tell me Bama is a lock in that scenario. They would be sweating it out.

They should be sweating it out, but you have more faith in the committee than I do.

Until proven otherwise, I just don't see the SEC champ, especially Bama, being left out unless it's a situation where there's no way the committee can put them in over someone else.

To me, that means they have to have 1 more loss than everyone else.
 
Big targeting call on FSU. Refs didn't see it/ call it on the field. Replay booth caught it. Personal foul & ejection. Just a guy rushing the QB with his hands up to disrupt the pass and hit him in the head with his hand (pretty hard) on the follow through. Nothing intentional. This is the rule now.
 
If Umass wasn't the worse offensive team in all of FBS they would be up multiple scores

Edit: 1:07 left, Umass has it on own 15. Crazier things have happened

Edit: Well Umass is one of the worst teams for a reason. The fact that they even remotely had a chance to win this at the end is a testament to how poor of a team Tennessee is, and by proxy Florida. CU hasn't looked great but I still think we'd beat UT or Florida
 
Last edited:
Targeting call by the book on a TAMU player, but that's a harsh call at this point in the game.

Edit: Taken off the board. Surprising.
 
Only if there's 4 undefeateds. I just don't see Bama being left out. Call it a lifetime achievement award if you will, but a one-loss Bama gets in over a, say, 1 loss Pac-12 champ.

You know it's true.

Two things-One, I have a hard time seeing where Alabama loses outside of Mississippi State or maybe Auburn. Two, even if they do lose.....its more likely one loss Alabama vs. a one loss Big 10/Big 12 team.
 
If Umass wasn't the worse offensive team in all of FBS they would be up multiple scores

Edit: 1:07 left, Umass has it on own 15. Crazier things have happened

Edit: Well Umass is one of the worst teams for a reason. The fact that they even remotely had a chance to win this at the end is a testament to how poor of a team Tennessee is, and by proxy Florida. CU hasn't looked great but I still think we'd beat UT or Florida

I think we're the second best team in the SEC if you put us in that league LOL
 
See that pocket/rollout scheme Ark uses? That's what CU needs.

But, then again Lindgren ain't no Enos.
 
Back
Top